Visibility of retractions: A cross-sectional one-year study

BMC Research Notes

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Decullier, Evelyne ^a,b,c   Huot, Laure ^a,b,c   Samson, Géraldine ^a,b,c   Maisonneuve, Hervé ^b  

^a HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Guidelines; Retraction of publication; Scientific misconduct

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PUBLISHING;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; RETRACTION OF PUBLICATION AS TOPIC;

EID: 84879065396     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17560500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-238     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals [ http://www.icmje.org ]
2. Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICMJE journals. Drazen JM, Van Der Weyden MB, Sahni P, Rosenberg J, Marusic A, Laine C, Kotzin S, Horton R, Hebert PC, Haug C, et al. Lancet 2009 374 1395 1396 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61796-7 19836071
3. Can peer review police fraud? Nat Neurosci 2006 9 149 16439975
4. Scientists behaving badly. Martinson BC, Anderson MS, De Vries R, Nature 2005 435 737 738 10.1038/435737a 15944677 (Pubitemid 40839708)
5. Misinformation in the medical literature: What role do error and fraud play? Steen RG, J Med Ethics 2011 37 498 503 10.1136/jme.2010.041830 21343631
6. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Sox HC, Rennie D, Ann Intern Med 2006 144 609 613 10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00123 16522625 (Pubitemid 46768147)
7. When to retract? Smith R, BMJ 2003 327 883 884 10.1136/bmj.327.7420.883 14563721 (Pubitemid 37289960)
8. Retractions Come in Boldt Case, Likely Most for Single Author. Probe finds 88 papers lacked ethics approval. Marcus A, Anesthesiology News 2011 37
9. [What can we learn from the Scott Reuben case? Scientific misconduct in anaesthesiology]. Rittner HL, Kranke P, Schafer M, Roewer N, Brack A, Anaesthesist 2009 58 1199 1209 10.1007/s00101-009-1637-6 19902152
10. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008. Wager E, Williams P, J Med Ethics 2011 37 567 570 10.1136/jme.2010.040964 21486985
11. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Steen RG, J Med Ethics 2011 37 249 253 10.1136/jme.2010.040923 21186208
12. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? Steen RG, J Med Ethics 2011 37 113 117 10.1136/jme.2010.038125 21081306
13. Corbyn Z, Retractions up tenfold Higher Education: Times 2009
14. COPE, Retraction guidelines 2009 [ http://www.publicationethics.org/ files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf ]
15. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? Nath SB, Marcus SC, Druss BG, Med J Aust 2006 185 152 154 16893357 (Pubitemid 44262800)
16. Empirical developments in retraction. Redman BK, Yarandi HN, Merz JF, J Med Ethics 2008 34 807 809 10.1136/jme.2007.023069 18974415
17. Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR, JAMA 1998 280 296 297 10.1001/jama.280.3.296 9676689 (Pubitemid 28493915)
18. Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR, Scoville C, Bull Med Libr Assoc 1999 87 437 443 10550028 (Pubitemid 29517881)
19. The rules of retraction. Newman M, BMJ 341 6985
20. Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals. Atlas MC, J Med Libr Assoc 2004 92 242 250 15098054 (Pubitemid 39348768)
21. Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: findings from a qualitative study. Williams P, Wager E, Sci Eng Ethics 2013 19 1 11 10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0 21761244
22. The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature. Pfeifer MP, Snodgrass GL, JAMA 1990 263 1420 1423 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100140020 2406475 (Pubitemid 20069951)
23. Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? Steen RG, J Med Ethics 2011 37 688 692 10.1136/jme.2011. 043133 21586404
24. CrossMark Support Site [ http://crossmarksupport.crossref.org/ ]
25. Retracted Science and the Retraction Index. Fang FC, Casadevall A, Infect Immun 2011 79 3855 3859 10.1128/IAI.05661-11 21825063