Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010

Scientometrics

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 555-561

  He, Tianwei ^a  

^a JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Retraction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880136070     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0906-3     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Budd, J. M., Sievert, M. E., & Schultz, T. R. (1998). Phenomena of retraction: Reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. JAMA, 280(3), 296-297.
2. Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One, 4(5), e5738. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0005738.
3. Fang, F. C., & Casadevall, A. (2011). Retracted science and the Retraction Index. Infection and Immunity, 79(10), 3855-3859.
4. Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevalld, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(42), 17028-17033.
5. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471-479.
6. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357-367.
7. Nath, S. B., Marcus, S. C., & Druss, B. G. (2006). Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistake. Medical Journal of Australia, 185(3), 152-154.
8. Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2004). Rank-normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categories. Presented at the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, Providence. http://garfield. library. upenn. edu/papers/asistranknormalization2004. pdf.
9. Samp, J. C., Schumock, G. T., & Pickard, A. S. (2012). Retracted publications in the drug literature. Pharmacotherapy, 32(7), 586-595.
10. Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5-6), 281-291.
11. Sen, B. K. (1992). Normalised impact factor. Journal of Documentation, 48(3), 318-325.
12. Steen, R. G. (2011). Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(2), 113-117.
13. van Noorden, R. (2011). The trouble with retractions. Nature, 478(7367), 26-28.
14. Wager, E., & Williams, P. (2011). Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 567-570.