Recent advances in ChIP-seq analysis: From quality management to whole-genome annotation

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 279-290

  Nakato, Ryuichiro ^a   Shirahige, Katsuhiko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Chromatin immunoprecipitation; Differential analysis; Experimental design; Large scale analysis; Quality management; Single cell analysis

Indexed keywords

CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENOME; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VALIDITY; BINDING SITE; DNA SEQUENCE; HUMAN;

DNA; PROTEIN BINDING;

BINDING SITES; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA; GENOME; HUMANS; PROTEIN BINDING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 85018765775     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbw023     Document Type: Article

References (134)

1. Park PJ. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat Reu Genet 2009;10:669-80.
2. Pepke S, Wold B, Mortazavi A. Computation for ChIP-seq and RNA-seq studies. Nat Methods 2009;6:S22-32.
3. Furey TS. ChIP-seq and beyond: new and improved methodologies to detect and characterize protein-DNA interactions. Nat Reu Genet 2012;13:840-52.
4. Deardorff MA, Bando M, Nakato R, et al. HDAC8 mutations in Cornelia de Lange syndrome affect the cohesin acetylation cycle. Nature 2012;489:313-17.
5. Schaub MA, Boyle AP, Kundaje A, et al. Linking disease associations with regulatory information in the human genome. Genome Res 2012;22:1748-59.
6. Zuin J, Franke V, van Ijcken WF, et al. A cohesin-independent role for NIPBL at promoters provides insights in CdLS. PLoS Genet 2014;10:e1004153
7. Izumi K, Nakato R, Zhang Z, et al. Germline gain-of-function mutations in AFF4 cause a developmental syndrome functionally linking the super elongation complex and cohesin. Nat Genet 2015;47:338-44.
8. Mikkelsen TS, Xu Z, Zhang X, et al. Comparative epigenomic analysis of murine and human adipogenesis. Cell 2010;143:156-69.
9. Ernst J, Kheradpour P, Mikkelsen TS, et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 2011;473:43-9.
10. Shang WH, Hori T, Martins NM, et al. Chromosome engineering allows the efficient isolation of vertebrate neocentromeres. Deu Cell 2013;24:635-48.
11. Jeppsson K, Carlborg KK, Nakato R, et al. The chromosomal association of the smc5/6 complex depends on cohesion and predicts the level of sister chromatid entanglement. PLoS Genet 2014;10:e1004680
12. Hansen P, Hecht J, Ibrahim DM, et al. Saturation analysis of ChIP-seq data for reproducible identification of binding peaks. Genome Res 2015;25:1391-400.
13. Sutani T, Sakata T, Nakato R, et al. Condensin targets and reduces unwound DNA structures associated with transcription in mitotic chromosome condensation. Nat Commun 2015;6:7815
14. Machanick P, Bailey TL. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1696-7.
15. Thomas-Chollier M, Herrmann C, Defrance M, et al. RSAT peak-motifs: motif analysis in full-size ChIP-seq datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:e31
16. McLean CY, Bristor D, Hiller M, et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:495-501.
17. Welch RP, Lee C, Imbriano PM, et al. ChIP-Enrich: gene set enrichment testing for ChIP-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:e105
18. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 2012;485:376-80.
19. Li G, Ruan X, Auerbach RK, et al. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 2012;148:84-98.
20. Agirre X, Castellano G, Pascual M, et al. Whole-epigenome analysis in multiple myeloma reveals DNA hypermethylation of B cell-specific enhancers. Genome Res 2015;25:478-87.
21. Alekseyenko AA, Gorchakov AA, Zee BM, et al. Heterochromatin-associated interactions of Drosophila HP1a with dADD1, HIPP1, and repetitive RNAs. Genes Dev 2014;28:1445-60.
22. Lin C, Garrett AS, De Kumar B, et al. Dynamic transcriptional events in embryonic stem cells mediated by the super elongation complex (SEC). Genes Deu 2011;25:1486-98.
23. Churchman LS, Weissman JS. Nascent transcript sequencing visualizes transcription at nucleotide resolution. Nature 2011;469:368-73.
24. Nojima T, Gomes T, Grosso AR, et al. Mammalian NET-seq reveals genome-wide nascent transcription coupled to RNA processing. Cell 2015;161:526-40.
25. Gerstein MB, Kundaje A, Hariharan M, et al. Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data. Nature 2012;489:91-100.
26. Yan J, Enge M, Whitington T, et al. Transcription factor binding in human cells occurs in dense clusters formed around cohesin anchor sites. Cell 2013;154:801-13.
27. Griffon A, Barbier Q, Dalino J, et al. Integrative analysis of public ChIP-seq experiments reveals a complex multi-cell regulatory landscape. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:e27
28. Hoffman MM, Ernst J, Wilder SP, et al. Integrative annotation of chromatin elements from ENCODE data. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:827-41.
29. Kundaje A, Meuleman W, Ernst J, et al.; Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 2015;518:317-30.
30. Landt SG, Marinov GK, Kundaje A, et al. ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia. Genome Res 2012;22:1813-31.
31. Meyer CA, Liu XS. Identifying and mitigating bias in next-generation sequencing methods for chromatin biology. Nat Rev Genet 2014;15:709-21.
32. Rhee HS, Pugh BF. Comprehensive genome-wide proteinDNA interactions detected at single-nucleotide resolution. Cell 2011;147:1408-19.
33. He Q, Johnston J, Zeitlinger J. ChIP-nexus enables improved detection of in vivo transcription factor binding footprints. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33:395-401.
34. Kelly TK, Liu Y, Lay FD, et al. Genome-wide mapping of nu-cleosome positioning and DNA methylation within individual DNA molecules. Genome Res 2012;22:2497-506.
35. Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, et al. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods 2013;10:1213-18.
36. Muller CA, Hawkins M, Retkute R, et al. The dynamics of genome replication using deep sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:e3
37. He HH, Meyer CA, Hu SS, et al. Refined DNase-seq protocol and data analysis reveals intrinsic bias in transcription factor footprint identification. Nat Methods 2014;11:73-8.
38. Chen Y, Negre N, Li Q, et al. Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity. Nat Methods 2012;9:609-14.
39. Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 2008;9:R137
40. Kharchenko PV, Tolstorukov MY, Park PJ. Design and analysis of ChIP-seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:1351-9.
41. Auerbach RK, Euskirchen G, Rozowsky J, et al. Mapping accessible chromatin regions using Sono-Seq. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:14926-31.
42. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, et al. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 2009;10:R25.
43. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1754-60.
44. Rozowsky J, Abyzov A, Wang J, et al. AlleleSeq: analysis of al-lele-specific expression and binding in a network framework. Mol Syst Biol 2011;7:522.
45. Encode Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012;489:57-74.
46. Chung D, Kuan PF, Li B, et al. Discovering transcription factor binding sites in highly repetitive regions of genomes with multi-read analysis of ChIP-Seq data. PLoS Comput Biol 2011;7:e1002111
47. Day DS, Luquette LJ, Park PJ, et al. Estimating enrichment of repetitive elements from high-throughput sequence data. Genome Biol 2010;11:R69.
48. Rozowsky J, Euskirchen G, Auerbach RK, et al. PeakSeq enables systematic scoring ofChIP-seq experiments relative to controls. Nat Biotechnol 2009;27:66-75.
49. Koehler R, Issac H, Cloonan N, et al. The uniqueome: a mapp-ability resource for short-tag sequencing. Bioinformatics 2011;27:272-4.
50. Derrien T, Estelle J, Marco Sola S, et al. Fast computation and applications of genome mappability. PLoS One 2012;7:e30377.
51. Sims D, Sudbery I, Ilott NE, et al. Sequencing depth and coverage: key considerations in genomic analyses. Nat Rev Genet 2014;15:121-32.
52. Schmidt D, Schwalie PC, Ross-Innes CS, et al. A CTCF-independent role for cohesin in tissue-specific transcription. Genome Res 2010;20:578-88.
53. Jung YL, Luquette LJ, Ho JW, et al. Impact of sequencing depth in ChIP-seq experiments. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:e74.
54. Zuo C, Keles S. A statistical framework for power calculations in ChIP-seq experiments. Bioinformatics 2014;30:753-60.
55. Daley T, Smith AD. Predicting the molecular complexity of sequencing libraries. Nat Methods 2013;10:325-7.
56. Marinov GK, Kundaje A, Park PJ, et al. Large-scale quality analysis of published ChIP-seq data. G3 (Bethesda) 2014;4:209-23.
57. Guttman M, Garber M, Levin JZ, et al. Ab initio reconstruction of cell type-specific transcriptomes in mouse reveals the conserved multi-exonic structure of lincRNAs. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:503-10.
58. Nakato R, Itoh T, Shirahige K. DROMPA: easy-to-handle peak calling and visualization software for the computational analysis and validation of ChIP-seq data. Genes Cells 2013;18:589-601.
59. Rosenbloom KR, Armstrong J, Barber GP, et al. The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:D670-81.
60. Flensburg C, Kinkel SA, Keniry A, et al. A comparison of control samples for ChIP-seq of histone modifications. Front Genet 2014;5:329.
61. Zang C, Schones DE, Zeng C, et al. A clustering approach for identification of enriched domains from histone modification ChIP-Seq data. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1952-8.
62. Xu H, Handoko L, Wei X, et al. A signal-noise model for significance analysis of ChIP-seq with negative control. Bioinformatics 2010;26:1199-204.
63. Ji H, Jiang H, Ma W, et al. An integrated software system for analyzing ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq data. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:1293-300.
64. Spyrou C, Stark R, Lynch AG, et al. BayesPeak: Bayesian analysis ofChIP-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:299.
65. Kuan PF, Chung DJ, Pan GJ, et al. A statistical framework for the analysis of ChIP-Seq data. J Am Stat Assoc 2011;106:891-903.
66. Rashid NU, Giresi PG, Ibrahim JG, et al. ZINBA integrates local covariates with DNA-seq data to identify broad and narrow regions of enrichment, even within amplified genomic regions. Genome Biol 2011;12:R67.
67. Guo Y, Papachristoudis G, Altshuler RC, et al. Discovering homotypic binding events at high spatial resolution. Bioinformatics 2010;26:3028-34.
68. Zhang X, Robertson G, Krzywinski M, et al. PICS: probabilistic inference for ChIP-seq. Biometrics 2011;67:151-63.
69. Jothi R, Cuddapah S, Barski A, et al. Genome-wide identification of in vivo protein-DNA binding sites from ChIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:5221-31.
70. Bardet AF, Steinmann J, Bafna S, et al. Identification of transcription factor binding sites from ChIP-seq data at high resolution. Bioinformatics 2013;29:2705-13.
71. Zhang Y, Lin YH, Johnson TD, et al. PePr: a peak-calling prioritization pipeline to identify consistent or differential peaks from replicated ChIP-Seq data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2568-75.
72. Ibrahim MM, Lacadie SA, Ohler U. JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates. Bioinformatics 2015;31:48-55.
73. Wang J, Lunyak VV, Jordan IK. BroadPeak: a novel algorithm for identifying broad peaks in diffuse ChIP-seq datasets. Bioinformatics 2013;29:492-3.
74. Harmanci A, Rozowsky J, Gerstein M. MUSIC: identification of enriched regions in ChIP-Seq experiments using a mapp-ability-corrected multiscale signal processing framework. Genome Biol 2014;15:474.
75. Xing H, Mo Y, Liao W, et al. Genome-wide localization of protein-DNA binding and histone modification by a Bayesian change-point method with ChIP-seq data. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8:e1002613.
76. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014;15:550.
77. Zhou X, Lindsay H, Robinson MD. Robustly detecting differential expression in RNA sequencing data using observation weights. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:e91.
78. Rahl PB, Lin CY, Seila AC, et al. c-Myc regulates transcriptional pause release. Cell 2010;141:432-45.
79. Teytelman L, Thurtle DM, Rine J, et al. Highly expressed loci are vulnerable to misleading ChIP localization of multiple unrelated proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:18602-7.
80. Foltman M, Evrin C, De Piccoli G, et al. Eukaryotic replisome components cooperate to process histones during chromosome replication. Cell Rep 2013;3:892-904.
81. Kubota T, Katou Y, Nakato R, et al. Replication-Coupled PCNA Unloading by the Elg1 Complex Occurs Genome-wide and Requires Okazaki Fragment Ligation. Cell Rep 2015;12:774-87.
82. Laajala TD, Raghav S, Tuomela S, et al. A practical comparison of methods for detecting transcription factor binding sites in ChIP-seq experiments. BMC Genomics 2009;10:618.
83. Malone BM, Tan F, Bridges SM, et al. Comparison of four ChIP-Seq analytical algorithms using rice endosperm H3K27 trimethylation profiling data. PLoS One 2011;6:e25260.
84. Wilbanks EG, Facciotti MT. Evaluation of algorithm performance in ChIP-seq peak detection. PLoS One 2010;5:e11471.
85. Rye MB, Saetrom P, Drablos F. A manually curated ChIP-seq benchmark demonstrates room for improvement in current peak-finder programs. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:e25.
86. Faure AJ, Schmidt D, Watt S, et al. Cohesin regulates tissue-specific expression by stabilizing highly occupied cis-regulatory modules. Genome Res 2012;22:2163-75.
87. Bardet AF, He Q, Zeitlinger J, et al. A computational pipeline for comparative ChIP-seq analyses. Nat Protoc 2012;7:45-61.
88. Li Q, Brown JB, Huang H, et al. Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments. Ann Appl Stat 2011;5:1752-79.
89. Jain D, Baldi S, Zabel A, et al. Active promoters give rise to false positive 'Phantom Peaks' in ChIP-seq experiments. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:6959-68.
90. Diaz A, Park K, Lim DA, et al. Normalization, bias correction, and peak calling for ChIP-seq. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2012;11:article 9.
91. Taslim C, Wu J, Yan P, et al. Comparative study on ChIP-seq data: normalization and binding pattern characterization. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2334-40.
92. Maehara K, Odawara J, Harada A, et al. A co-localization model of paired ChIP-seq data using a large ENCODE data set enables comparison of multiple samples. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:54-62.
93. Shao Z, Zhang Y, Yuan GC, et al. MAnorm: a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets. Genome Biol 2012;13:R16.
94. Chen L, Wang C, Qin ZS, et al. A novel statistical method for quantitative comparison of multiple ChIP-seq datasets. Bioinformatics 2015;31:1889-96.
95. Bonhoure N, Bounova G, Bernasconi D, et al. Quantifying ChIP-seq data: a spiking method providing an internal reference for sample-to-sample normalization. Genome Res 2014;24:1157-68.
96. Orlando DA, Chen MW, Brown VE, et al. Quantitative ChIP-Seq normalization reveals global modulation of the epigenome. Cell Rep 2014;9:1163-70.
97. Grzybowski AT, Chen Z, Ruthenburg AJ. Calibrating ChIP-Seq with nucleosomal internal standards to measure histone modification density genome wide. Mol Cell 2015;58:886-99.
98. Hu Z, Chen K, Xia Z, et al. Nucleosome loss leads to global transcriptional up-regulation and genomic instability duringyeast aging. Genes Deu 2014;28:396-408.
99. Hu B, Petela N, Kurze A, et al. Biological chromodynamics: a general method for measuring protein occupancy across the genome by calibrating ChIP-seq. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:e132.
100. Cheng Y, Ma Z, Kim BH, et al. Principles of regulatory information conservation between mouse and human. Nature 2014;515:371-5.
101. Boyle AP, Araya CL, Brdlik C, et al. Comparative analysis of regulatory information and circuits across distant species. Nature 2014;512:453-6.
102. Yue F, Cheng Y, Breschi A, et al. A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome. Nature 2014;515:355-64.
103. Ernst J, Kellis M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat Methods 2012;9:215-16.
104. Hoffman MM, Buske OJ, Wang J, et al. Unsupervised pattern discovery in human chromatin structure through genomic segmentation. Nat Methods 2012;9:473-6.
105. Nielsen CB, Younesy H, O'Geen H, et al. Spark: a navigational paradigm for genomic data exploration. Genome Res 2012;22:2262-9.
106. Biesinger J, Wang Y, Xie X. Discovering and mapping chromatin states using a tree hidden Markov model. BMC Bioinformatics 2013;14(Suppl 5):S4.
107. Song J, Chen KC. Spectacle: fast chromatin state annotation using spectral learning. Genome Biol 2015;16:33
108. Mammana A, Chung HR. Chromatin segmentation based on a probabilistic model for read counts explains a large portion of the epigenome. Genome Biol 2015;16:151.
109. Yen A, Kellis M. Systematic chromatin state comparison of epigenomes associated with diverse properties including sex and tissue type. Nat Commun 2015;6:7973.
110. Ernst J, Kellis M. Large-scale imputation of epigenomic datasets for systematic annotation of diverse human tissues. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33:364-76.
111. Sohn KA, Ho JW, Djordjevic D, et al. hiHMM: Bayesian non-parametric joint inference of chromatin state maps. Bioinformatics 2015;31:2066-74.
112. Zeng X, Sanalkumar R, Bresnick EH, et al. jMOSAiCS: joint analysis of multiple ChIP-seq datasets. Genome Biol 2013;14:R38.
113. Bao Y, Vinciotti V, Wit E, et al. Joint modeling of ChIP-seq data via a Markov random field model. Biostatistics 2014;15:296-310.
114. Mahony S, Edwards MD, Mazzoni EO, et al. An integrated model of multiple-condition ChIP-Seq data reveals predeterminants of Cdx2 binding. PLoS Comput Biol 2014;10:e1003501.
115. Wong KC, Li Y, Peng CB, et al. SignalSpider: probabilistic pattern discovery on multiple normalized ChIP-Seq signal profiles. Bioinformatics 2015;31:17-24.
116. Bheda P, Schneider R. Epigenetics reloaded: the single-cell revolution. Trends Cell Biol 2014;24:712-23.
117. Schwartzman O, Tanay A. Single-cell epigenomics: techniques and emerging applications. Nat Rev Genet 2015;16:716-26.
118. Rotem A, Ram O, Shoresh N, et al. Single-cell ChIP-seq reveals cell subpopulations defined by chromatin state. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33:1165-72.
119. Mazutis L, Gilbert J, Ung WL, et al. Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics. Nat Protoc 2013;8:870-91.
120. Klein AM, Mazutis L, Akartuna I, et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 2015;161:1187-201.
121. Rotem A, Ram O, Shoresh N, et al. High-Throughput Single-Cell Labeling (Hi-SCL) for RNA-Seq using drop-based micro-fluidics. PLoS One 2015;10:e0116328.
122. Macosko EZ, Basu A, Satija R, et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 2015;161:1202-14.
123. Adli M, Bernstein BE. Whole-genome chromatin profiling from limited numbers of cells using nano-ChIP-seq. Nat Protoc 2011;6:1656-68.
124. Shankaranarayanan P, Mendoza-Parra MA, Walia M, et al. Single-tube linear DNA amplification (LinDA) for robust ChIP-seq. Nat Methods 2011;8:565-7.
125. Lara-Astiaso D, Weiner A, Lorenzo-Vivas E, et al. Immunogenetics. Chromatin state dynamics during blood formation. Science 2014;345:943-9.
126. Greenleaf WJ. Assaying the epigenome in limited numbers of cells. Methods 2015;72:51-6.
127. Schmidl C, Rendeiro AF, Sheffield NC, et al. ChIPmentation: fast, robust, low-input ChIP-seq for histones and transcription factors. Nat Methods 2015;12:963-5.
128. Zhou X, Li D, Zhang B, et al. Epigenomic annotation of genetic variants using the Roadmap Epigenome Browser. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33:345-6.
129. Gulko B, Hubisz MJ, Gronau I, et al. A method for calculating probabilities of fitness consequences for point mutations across the human genome. Nat Genet 2015;47:276-83.
130. Brookes AJ, Robinson PN. Human genotype-phenotype databases: aims, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Genet 2015;16:702-15.
131. Church DM, Schneider VA, Steinberg KM, et al. Extending reference assembly models. Genome Biol 2015;16:13.
132. Sander JD, Joung JK. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat Biotechnol 2014;32:347-55.
133. He X, Cicek AE, Wang Y, et al. De novo ChIP-seq analysis. Genome Biol 2015;16:205.
134. Simpson JT, Pop M. The theory and practice of genome sequence assembly. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2015;16:153-72.