Longitudinal relations between teaching-related motivations and student-reported teaching quality

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 65, Issue , 2017, Pages 241-254

  Praetorius, Anna Katharina ^a   Lauermann, Fani ^b   Klassen, Robert M ^c   Dickhäuser, Oliver ^d   Janke, Stefan ^d   Dresel, Markus ^e  

^a GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Longitudinal effects; Teacher motivation; Teachers enthusiasm; Teachers self efficacy; Teaching quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 85017532440     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.023     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Arbuckle, J.L., Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. Marcoulides, G.A., Schumacker, R.E., (eds.) Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques, 1996, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 243–277.
2. Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. 1997, Freeman, New York, NY.
3. Bandura, A., On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management 38 (2012), 9–44, 10.1177/0149206311410606.
4. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal 47 (2010), 133–180.
5. Borko, H., Kuffner, K.L., Arnold, S.C., Creighton, L., Stecher, B., Martinez, F., et al. Using artifacts to describe instruction: Lessons learned from studying reform-oriented instruction in middle school mathematics and science. CSE Technical Report 705, 2007, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Los Angeles, CA.
6. Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Steca, P., Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (2003), 821–832, 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001.
7. Clausen, M., Qualität von Unterricht – Eine Frage der Perspektive? (Trans.) Quality of instruction – A question of perspective?, 2002, Waxmann, Munster.
8. Cohen, D.K., Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice. 1993, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
9. Cornelius-White, J., Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 77 (2007), 113–143.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Csikszentmihalyi, M., (eds.) Flow and the foundations of positive psychology, 2014, Springer, Dordrecht pp. 35–54.
11. Davis, H.A., Conceptualizing the role and influence of student–teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist 38 (2003), 207–234.
12. Dewey, John, Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. 1916, Macmillan, New York, NY.
13. Dicke, T., Parker, P.D., Holzberger, D., Kunter, M., Leutner, D., Beginning teachers’ efficacy and emotional exhaustion: Latent changes, reciprocity, and the influence of professional knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology 41 (2015), 62–72, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.003.
14. Dormann, C., Griffin, M., Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods 20 (2015), 489–505.
15. Eccles, Y., Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist 44 (2009), 78–89, 10.1080/00461520902832368.
16. Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology 53 (2002), 109–132, 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
17. Enders, C.K., Mistler, S.A., Keller, B.T., Multilevel multiple imputation: A review and evaluation of joint modeling and chained equations imputation. Psychological Methods 21 (2016), 222–240, 10.1037/met0000063.
18. Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A., Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data., 1993, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., Büttner, G., Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction 29 (2014), 1–9, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001.
20. Frenzel, A.C.*, Becker-Kurz, B.*, Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Teaching this class drives me nuts! – Examining the person and context specificity of teacher emotions. PLoS One, 10, 2015, 10.1371/journal.pone.0129630 (* authors contributed equally).
21. Frenzel, A.C., Goetz, T., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., Sutton, R.E., Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (2009), 705–716, 10.1037/a0014695.
22. Graham, S., Weiner, B., Theories and principles of motivation. Berliner, D.C., Calfee, R.C., (eds.) Handbook of educational psychology, 1996, Macmillan, New York, NY, 63–84.
23. Hamaker, E.L., Kuiper, R.M., Grasman, R.P., A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods 20 (2015), 102–116.
24. Hattie, J., Visible learning: A synthesis of meta-analyses relating to achievement. 2009, Routledge, London.
25. Hein, V., Ries, F., Pires, F., Caune, A., Emeljanovas, A., Heszteráné Ekler, J.H., et al. The relationship between teaching styles and motivation to teach among physical education teachers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 11 (2012), 123–130.
26. Holzberger, D., Phillip, A., Kunter, M., Ein Blick in die Black-Box: Wie der Zusammenhang von Unterrichtsenthusiasmus und Unterrichtshandeln von angehenden Lehrkräften erklärt werden kann. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 48 (2016), 90–105, 10.1026/0049-8637/a000150.
27. Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., Kunter, M., How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to teaching quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (2013), 774–786, 10.1037/a0032198.
28. Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., Kunter, M., Predicting teachers’ instructional behaviors: The interplay between self-efficacy and intrinsic needs. Contemporary Educational Psychology 39:2 (2014), 100–111, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.001.
29. Jamil, F.M., Downer, J.T., Pianta, R.C., Association of pre-service teachers’ performance, personality, and beliefs with teacher self-efficacy at program completion. Teacher Education Quarterly 39 (2012), 119–138.
30. Klassen, R.M., Chiu, M.M., Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology 102 (2010), 741–756, 10.1037/a0019237.
31. Klassen, R.M., Tze, V.M.C., Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 12 (2014), 59–76, 10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001.
32. Klieme, E., & Rakoczy, K. (2003). Unterrichtsqualität aus Schülerperspektive: Kulturspezifische Profile, regionale Unterschiede und Zusammenhänge mit Effekten von Unterricht. In J. Baumert, C. Artelt, E. Klieme, J. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele, W. Schneider, & K.-J. Tillmann (Eds.), PISA 2000. Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (pp. 334–359) [PISA 2000. A differentiated view on the German Laenders]. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
33. Klassen, R.M., Tze, V.M.C., Betts, S.M., Gordon, K.A., Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise?. Educational Psychological Review 23 (2011), 21–43, 10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8.
34. Kokkinou, E., Kyriakides, L., Assessing teacher effectiveness: Investigating the consistency of teacher behavior in different classrooms. Paper presented at the EARLI SIGs 18 and 23 joint conference in Oslo, 2016.
35. Kounin, J.S., Discipline and group management in classrooms. 1970, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY.
36. Kunter, M., Multiple Ziele im Mathematikunterricht (Trans.) Multiple goals in mathematics instructions, 2005, Waxmann, Münster, Germany.
37. Kunter, M. (2011). Forschung zur Lehrermotivation. In E. Terhart, H. Bennewitz, & M. Rothland (Eds.), Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrerberuf (pp. 527–539) [Handbook of research on the teacher job]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
38. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction. Learning Environments Research 9 (2006), 231–251, 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7.
39. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Voss, T., Klusmann, U., Richter, D., Hachfeld, A., Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology 10 (2013), 805–820, 10.1037/a0032583.
40. Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., Pekrun, R., Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (2011), 289–301, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.07.001.
41. Kunter, M., Holzberger, D., Loving teaching: Research on teachers’ intrinsic orientations. Richardson, P.W., Karabenick, S.A., Watt, H.M.G., (eds.) Teacher motivation: Theory and practice, 2014, Routledge, New York, NY, 83–99.
42. Kunter, M., Tsai, Y.-M., Klusmann, U., Brunner, M., Krauss, S., Baumert, J., Students’ and mathematics teachers’ perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learning and Instruction 18 (2008), 468–482, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.008.
43. LeBreton, J.M., Senter, J.L., Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods 11 (2008), 815–852.
44. Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., Pauli, C., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Klieme, E., Reusser, K., Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students’ understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem. Learning and Instruction 19 (2009), 527–537, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001.
45. Lohman, M.C., Factors influencing teachers’ engagement in informal learning activities. Journal of Workplace Learning 18 (2006), 141–156, 10.1108/13665620610654577.
46. Lortie, D.C., Schoolteacher: A sociological study. 1975, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
47. Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Kunter, M., Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34 (2009), 120–131, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001.
48. Mayer, R.E., Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist 59 (2004), 14–19, 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14.
49. McArdle, J.J., Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology 60 (2009), 577–605, 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612.
50. Morris-Rothschild, B., Brassard, M.R., Teachers’ conflict managment styles: The role of attachment styles and classroom managment efficacy. Journal of School Psychology 44 (2006), 105–121.
51. Muthén, L.K., Muthén, B.O., Mplus users’ guide. seventh ed., 1998–2012, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.
52. Patrick, H., Turner, J.C., Meyer, D.K., Midgley, C., How teachers establish psychological environments during the first days of school: Associations with avoidance in mathematics. Teachers College Record 105 (2003), 1521–1558.
53. Pelletier, L.G., Séguin-Lévesque, C., Legault, L., Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (2002), 186–196, 10.1037//0022-0663.94.1.186.
54. Pianta, R.C., Hamre, B.K., Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher 38 (2009), 109–119, 10.3102/0013189X09332374.
55. Praetorius, A.-K., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., One lesson is all you need? Stability of instructional quality across lessons. Learning and Instruction 31 (2014), 2–12, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.002.
56. Rakoczy, K., Motivationsunterstützung im Mathematikunterricht: Unterricht aus der Perspektive von Lernenden und Beobachtern (Trans.) Motivational support in mathematics lessons: Instruction from the perspectives of learners and observers, 2008, Waxmann, Münster, Germany.
57. Ramm, G., Prenzel, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Lehmann, R., Leutner, D., et al. PISA 2003 – Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente (Trans.) PISA 2003 – Documentation of the survey questionnaires, 2006, Waxmann, Münster, Germany.
58. Raudenbush, S.W., Rowan, B., Cheong, Y.F., Contextual effects on the self-perceived efficacy of high school teachers. Sociology of Education 65 (1992), 150–167, 10.2307/2112680.
59. Reyes, M.R., Brackett, M.A., Rivers, S.E., White, M., Salovey, P., Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 104 (2012), 700–712, 10.1037/a0027268.
60. Richardson, P.W., Watt, H.M.G., Current and future directions in teacher motivation research. Urdan, T.C., Karabenick, S.A., (eds.) Advances in motivation and achievement The decade ahead: Applications and contexts of motivation and achievement, 16A, 2010, Emerald Publishing Group, Bingley, UK, 139–173.
61. Ross, J.A., Bruce, C.D., Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (2007), 146–159.
62. Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Kaplan, H., Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (2007), 761–774, 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761.
63. Ryan, M.R., Deci, E.L., Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 51 (2000), 68–78.
64. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Müller, H., Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR-online 8 (2003), 23–74.
65. Schmitz, G.S., Schwarzer, R., Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung von Lehrern: Längsschnittbefunde mit einem neuen Instrument (Trans.) Perceived self-efficacy of teachers: Longitudinal findings with a new instrument Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 14 (2000), 12–25, 10.1024//1010-0652.14.1.12.
66. Schwarzer, R., Schmitz, G.S., Skala Lehrer-Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Schwarzer, R., Jerusalem, M., (eds.) Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen, 1999, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 60–61 [Scales for measuring teacher and student characteristics].
67. Seidel, T., Shavelson, R., Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research 77 (2007), 454–499.
68. Skaalvik, E.M., Skaalvik, S., Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (2007), 611–625, 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611.
69. Soodak, L.C., Podell, D.M., Teacher efficacy and the vulnerability of the difficult-to-teach student. Brophy, J., (eds.) Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 7, 1998, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 75–109.
70. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (2001), 783–805, 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.
71. Tschannen-Moran, M., McMaster, P., Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal 110 (2009), 228–245, 10.1086/605771.
72. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., Hoy, W.K., Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research 68 (1998), 202–248, 10.3102/00346543068002202.
73. Vieluf, S., Kunter, M., van de Vijver, F.J.R., Teacher self-efficacy in cross-national perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education 35 (2013), 92–103.
74. Voelkle, M.C., Oud, J.H.L., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., A SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: Relating authoritarism and anomia. Psychological Methods 17 (2012), 176–192, 10.1037/a0027543.
75. Ware, H., Kitsantas, A., Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment. Journal of Educational Research 100 (2007), 303–310.
76. Wheatley, K.F., The case for reconceptualizing teacher efficacy research. Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (2005), 747–766, 10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.009.
77. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (2000), 68–81, 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
78. Wild, E., Elterliche Erziehung und schulische Lernmotivation (Trans.) Parental education and academic motivation (Unpublished post-doctoral thesis), 1999, University of Mannheim, Germany.
79. Williams, L.J., Hartman, N., Cavazotte, F., Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique technique. Organizational Research Methods 13 (2010), 477–514, 10.1177/1094428110366036.
80. Willis, G., Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. 2005, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
81. Woolfolk Hoy, A., What motivates teachers? Important work on a complex question. Learning and Instruction 18 (2008), 492–498, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.007.
82. Woolfolk Hoy, A., Burke Spero, R., Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (2005), 343–356, 10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007.
83. Zee, M., Koomen, H.M.Y., Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research 86 (2016), 981–1015, 10.3102/0034654315626801.