The effects of fermentation and enzymatic treatment of pea on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broilers

Animal

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2017, Pages 1698-1707

  Goodarzi Boroojeni, F ^a   Senz, M ^b   Kozlowski K ^c   Boros, D ^d   Wisniewska, M ^d   Rose, D ^e   Manner K ^a   Zentek, J ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Institute of Biotechnology and Water   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARMIA AND MAZURY IN OLSZTYN   (Poland)

^d PLANT BREEDING AND ACCLIMATIZATION INSTITUTE NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

^e TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

anti nutritional factors; enzymatic treatment; legumes; solid state fermentation; galactosides

Indexed keywords

STARCH;

ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; CHICKEN; DIET; DIGESTION; FERMENTATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MAIZE; MALE; METABOLISM; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; PEA; PHYSIOLOGY; SOYBEAN; VETERINARY; WHEAT;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; DIET; DIGESTION; FERMENTATION; MALE; NUTRITIVE VALUE; PEAS; SOYBEANS; STARCH; TRITICUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 85017524075     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731117000787     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abdollahi MR, Ravindran V and Svihus B 2013. Pelleting of broiler diets: An overview with emphasis on pellet quality and nutritional value. Animal Feed Science and Technology 179, 1-23
2. Adeola O and Cowieson A 2011. Board-invited review: opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve nonruminant animal production. Journal of Animal Science 89, 3189-3218
3. American Association of Cereal Chemists 2003. Methods: 32-25 (dietary fibre), 32-40.01 (resistant starch). American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
4. Bedford M and Cowieson A 2012. Exogenous enzymes and their effects on intestinal microbiology. Animal Feed Science and Technology 173, 76-85
5. Bedford MR 2000. Exogenous enzymes in monogastric nutrition-Their current value and future benefits. Animal Feed Science and Technology 86, 1-13
6. Berrocoso J, Serrano M, Cámara L, López A and Mateos G 2013. Influence of source and micronization of soybean meal on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 309-317
7. Brenes A, Rotter B, Marquardt R and Guenter W 1993. The nutritional value of raw, autoclaved and dehulled peas (Pisum sativum L.) in chicken diets as affected by enzyme supplementation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 73, 605-614
8. Castell A, Guenter W and Igbasan F 1996. Nutritive value of peas for nonruminant diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 60, 209-227
9. Chen K-L, Kho W-L, You S-H, Yeh R-H, Tang S-W and Hsieh C-W 2009. Effects of Bacillus subtilis var. natto and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed fermented feed on the enhanced growth performance of broilers. Poultry Science 88, 309-315
10. Chiang G, Lu W, Piao X, Hu J, Gong L and Thacker P 2010. Effects of feeding solid-state fermented rapeseed meal on performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal ecology and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 23, 263-271
11. Denstadli V, Westereng B, Biniyam HG, Ballance S, Knutsen SH and Svihus B 2010. Effects of structure and xylanase treatment of brewers spent grain on performance and nutrient availability in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 51, 419-426
12. Englyst HN and Cummings JH 1984. Simplified method for the measurement of total non-starch polysaccharides by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. Analyst 109, 937-942
13. Farrell DJ, Perez-Maldonado RA and Mannion PF 1999. Optimum inclusion of field peas, faba beans, chick peas and sweet lupins in poultry diets. II. Broiler experiments. British Poultry Science 40, 674-680
14. Fasina Y and Campbell G 1997. Whole canola/pea and whole canola/canola meal blends in diets for broiler chickens. 2. Determination of optimal inclusion levels. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77, 191-195
15. Feng J, Liu X, Xu Z, Wang Y and Liu J 2007. Effects of fermented soybean meal on digestive enzyme activities and intestinal morphology in broilers. Poultry Science 86, 1149-1154
16. Frikha M, Valencia D, de Coca-Sinova A, Lázaro R and Mateos G 2013. Ileal digestibility of amino acids of unheated and autoclaved pea protein concentrate in broilers. Poultry Science 92, 1848-1857
17. Gefrom A, Ott E, Hoedtke S and Zeyner A 2013. Effect of ensiling moist field bean (Vicia faba), pea (Pisum sativum) and lupine (Lupinus spp.) grains on the contents of alkaloids, oligosaccharides and tannins. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 97, 1152-1160
18. Gericke S and Kurmies B 1952. Die kolorimetrische Phosphorsäurebestimmung mit Ammonium-Vanadat-Molybdat und ihre Anwendung in der PflanzenanalyseZ Pflanzenernaehr Dueng Bodenkd 59, 235-247 GfE 1999. Empfehlungen zur Energie-und Nährstoffversorgung der Legehennen und Masthöhner Broiler. DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt (Main), Germany
19. Goodarzi Boroojeni F, Svihus B, von Reichenbach HG and Zentek J 2016. The effects of hydrothermal processing on feed hygiene, nutrient availability, intestinal microbiota and morphology in poultry-A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 220, 187-215
20. Igbasan F and Guenter W 1996. The evaluation and enhancement of the nutritive value of yellow-, green-And brown-seeded pea cultivars for unpelleted diets given to broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 63, 9-24
21. Kakade M, Rackis J, McGhee J and Puski G 1974. Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soy products: A collaborative analysis of an improved procedure. Cereal Chemistry 51, 376-382
22. Laudadio V, Nahashon S and Tufarelli V 2012. Growth performance and carcass characteristics of guinea fowl broilers fed micronized-dehulled pea (Pisum sativum L.) as a substitute for soybean meal. Poultry Science 91, 2988-2996
23. Meng X, Slominski B, Nyachoti C, Campbell L and GuenterW 2005. Degradation of cell wall polysaccharides by combinations of carbohydrase enzymes and their effect on nutrient utilization and broiler chicken performance. Poultry Science 84, 37-47
24. Nair V and Duvnjak Z 1990. Reduction of phytic acid content in canola meal by Aspergillus ficuum in solid state fermentation process. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 34, 183-188
25. Nalle C, Ravindran V and Ravindran G 2011. Nutritional value of peas (Pisum sativum L.) for broilers: Apparent metabolisable energy, apparent ileal amino acid digestibility and production performance. Animal Production Science 51, 150-155
26. Naumann K and Bassler R 2004. Methodenbuch Band III: Die chemischeUntersuchung von Futtermitteln. Neumann-Neudamm, Melsungen, Germany
27. Ouoba L, Cantor M, Diawara B, Traore A and Jakobsen M 2003. Degradation of African locust bean oil by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus isolated from soumbala, a fermented African locust bean condiment. Journal of Applied Microbiology 95, 868-873
28. Ouoba LII, Diawara B, Christensen T, Mikkelsen JD and Jakobsen M 2007 Degradation of polysaccharides and non-digestible oligosaccharides by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus isolated from Soumbala, a fermented African locust bean (Parkia biglobosa) food Condiment. European Food Research and Technology 224, 689-694
29. Ravindran V 2013. Feed enzymes: The science, practice, and metabolic realities The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 22, 628-636
30. Ruiz-Teran F and Owens DJ 1996. Chemical and enzymic changes during the fermentation of bacteriafree soya bean tempe. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 71, 523-530
31. Schäfer K 1995. Analysis of short chain fatty acids from different intestinal samples by capillary gas chromatography. Chromatographia 40, 550-556
32. Selle P, Ravindran V, Caldwell A and Bryden W 2000. Phytate and phytase: consequences for protein utilisation. Nutrition Research Reviews 13, 255-278
33. Short F, Gorton P, Wiseman J and Boorman K 1996. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Animal Feed Science and Technology 59, 215-221
34. Svihus B 2011. The gizzard: function, influence of diet structure and effects on nutrient. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 67, 207-224
35. Svihus B, Newman RK and Newman CW 1997. Effect of soaking, germination, and enzyme treatment of whole barley on nutritional value and digestive tract parameters of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 38, 390-396
36. Svihus B, Hetland H, Choct M and Sundby F 2002. Passage rate through the anterior digestive tract of broiler chickens fed on diets with ground and whole wheat. British Poultry Science 43, 662-668
37. Svihus B, Uhlen AK and Harstad OM 2005. Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 122, 303-320
38. Teng D, Gao M, Yang Y, Liu B, Tian Z and Wang J 2012. Bio-modification of soybean meal with Bacillus subtilis or Aspergillus oryzae. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 1, 32-38
39. VDLUFA 2003. Handbuch der landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs-und Untersuchungsmethodik, Methodenbuch Band VI-Chemische, physikalische und mikrobiologische Untersuchungsverfahren för Milch Milchprodukte und Molkereihilfsstoffe. VDLUFAVerlag, Darmstadt, Germany
40. Xu F, Zeng X and Ding X 2012. Effects of replacing soybean meal with fermented rapeseed meal on performance, serum biochemical variables and intestinal morphology of broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 25, 1734
41. Ying W, Zhu R, Lu W and Gong L 2009. A new strategy to apply Bacillus subtilis MA139 for the production of solidstate fermentation feed. Letters in Applied Microbiology 49, 229-234