Experts, theories, and electric mobility transitions: Toward an integrated conceptual framework for the adoption of electric vehicles

Energy Research and Social Science

Volumn 27, Issue , 2017, Pages 78-95

  Sovacool, Benjamin K ^a,b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actor Network Theory; Automobility; Electric vehicles; Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015440705     PISSN: 22146296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (169)

1. [1] Mom, Gijs P.A., The Electric Vehicle: Technology and Expectations in the Automobile Age. 2004, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2004.
2. [2] Kirsch, David A., The Electric Vehicle and the Burden of History. 2000, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 2000.
3. [3] Urry, John, Mobilities. 2007, Polity Press, London.
4. [4] Brown, M.A., Sovacool, B.K., Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options. 2011, MIT Press, Cambridge.
5. [5] Delucchi, Mark, McCubbin, Don, External costs of transport in the United States. de Palma, Andre, Lindsey, Robin, Quinet, Emile, Vickerman, Roger, (eds.) A Handbook of Transport Economics, 2011, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 341–368.
6. [6] Woodcock, James, Banister, David, Edwards, Phil, Prentice, Andrew M., Roberts, Ian, Energy and transport. Lancet 370 (2007), 1078–1088.
7. [7] A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport. Kemp, R., Geels, F.W., Dudley, G., Lyons, G., (eds.), 2012, Routledge, New York.
8. [8] Kormos, C., Gifford, R., The validity of self-report measures of pro-environmental behavior: a meta-analytic review. J. Environ. Psychol. 40 (2014), 359–371.
9. [9] Mitchell, William J., Borroni-Bird, Christopher E., Lawrence, D., Burns, Reinventing the Automobile Personal Urban Mobility for the 21st Century. 2010, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. [10] Sovacool, Benjamin K., Hirsh, Richard F., Beyond batteries: an examination of the benefits and barriers to plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) transition. Energy Policy 37:3 (2009), 1095–1103.
11. [11] Tran, M., Banister, D., Bishop, J.D.K., McCulloch, M.D., Simulating early adoption of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainability. Technol. Forecast. Social Change 80:5 (2013), 865–875.
12. [12] Ryghaug, Marianne, Toftaker, Marit, A transformative practice?. Meaning, competence, and material aspects of driving electric cars in Norway. Nat. Culture 9:Summer (2) (2014), 146–163.
13. [13] Turton, H., Moura, F., Vehicle-to-grid systems for sustainable development: an integrated energy analysis. Technol. Forecast. Social Change, 75(8), 2008.
14. [14] How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Oudshoorn, Nelly, Pinch, Trevor, (eds.), 2003, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. [15] Schot, J., Kanger, L., Verbong, G., The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems. Nat. Energy, 1, 2016, 16054.
16. [16] Hughes, Thomas P., Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. 1983, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
17. [17] Hughes, Thomas P., The evolution of large technological systems. Bijker, Wiebe E., Hughes, T., Pinch, Trevor J., (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, 1987, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. [18] Melosi, Martin V., The Sanitary City: Urban Infrastructure in America from Colonial Times to the Present. 2000, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
19. [19] Freeman, C., Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. 1987, Pinter, London.
20. [20] Geels, F.W., Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 31:8 (2002), 1257–1274.
21. [21] MacKay, David J.C., Sustainable Energy—Without the Hot Air. 2008, UIT, Cambridge.
22. [22] Geels, Frank W., Dudley, Geoff, Kemp, Rene, Findings, conclusions and assessments of sustainability transitions in automobility. Geels, Frank, Kemp, Rene, Dudley, Geoff, Lyons, Glenn, (eds.) Automobility in Transition? A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport, 2012, Routledge, London, 335–373.
23. [23] Anable, Jillian, Lane, Ben, Kelay, Tanika, An Evidence Base Review of Public Attitudes to Climate Change and Transport Behavior. 2006, UK Department for Transport, London.
24. [24] Gjoen, Heidi, Hard, Mikael, Cultural politics in action: developing user scripts in relation to the electric vehicle. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 27:2 (2002), 262–281.
25. [25] Sachs, Wolfgang, For Love of the Automobile: Looking Back into the History of Our Desires. 1992, University of California Press, Los Angeles.
26. [26] Axsen, J., Kurani, K.S., Interpersonal influence within car buyers’ social networks: applying five perspectives to plug-in hybrid vehicle drivers. Environ. Plann. A 44 (2012), 1057–1065.
27. [27] Stephenson, Janet, et al. Conceptualizing transport transitions: energy cultures as an organizing framework. WIREs Energy Environ. 4 (2015), 354–364.
28. [28] Sheller, Mimi, The emergence of new cultures of mobility: stability, openings and prospects. Geels, Frank, Kemp, Rene, Dudley, Geoff, Lyons, Glenn, (eds.) Automobility in Transition? A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport, 2012, Routledge, London, 180–204.
29. [29] Flink, J.J., The Car Culture. 1975, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. [30] Sheller, Mimi, Urry, John, The new mobilities paradigm. Environ. Plann. A 38 (2006), 207–226.
31. [31] Hannam, Kevin, et al. Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities 1:March (1) (2006), 1–22.
32. [32] Urry, John, Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. 2000, Routledge, London and New York.
33. [33] Urry, John, The system of automobility. Theory Cult. Soc. 21:4 (2004), 25–39.
34. [34] Sagoff, Mark, The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment. 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. [35] Featherstone, Mike, Automobilities. Theory Cult. Soc. 21:4 (2004), 1–24.
36. [36] Wells, Peter, Xenias, Dimitrios, From ‘freedom of the open road’ to ‘cocooning’: understanding resistance to change in personal private automobility. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 16:September (2015), 106–119.
37. [37] Sheller, Mimi, Aluminum Dreams: The Making of Light Modernity. 2014, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. [38] Cohen, M.J., A social problems framework for the critical appraisal of automobility and sustainable systems innovation. Mobilities 1:1 (2006), 23–38.
39. [39] Walker, Lucy, et al. Boys on the road: masculinities, car culture, and road safety education. J. Men Stud. 8:March (2) (2000), 153–169.
40. [40] Sheller, Mimi, Automotive emotions: feeling the car, theory. Culture & Society 21:4/5 (2004), 221–242.
41. [41] Handy, Susan, Weston, Lisa, Mokhtarian, Patricia L., Driving by Choice or Necessity?. Transportation Research Part A 39:2–3 (2004), 183–203.
42. [42] Hagman, Olle, Driving Pleasure: A Key Concept in Swedish Car Culture. Mobilities 5:1 (2010), 25–39.
43. [43] Beckmann, Jörg, Mobility and safety. Theory Cult. Soc. 21:4/5 (2004), 81–100.
44. [44] Dant, Tim, The driver-car. Theory Cult. Soc. 21:4/5 (2004), 61–79.
45. [45] Latour, Bruno, Woolgar, Steve, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. 1979, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
46. [46] Callon, M., Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops of St Briuec Bay. Law, J., (eds.) Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, 1986, Routledge, New York.
47. [47] Callon, M., Latour, B., Unscrewing the big Levitiathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. Knorr-Cetina, K., Cicourel, A.V., (eds.) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology, 1986, Routledge, New York.
48. [48] Law, John, Actor Network Theory and After. 1999, Blackwell, London.
49. [49] Geels, F.W., Johnson, V., Understanding system diffusion: adoption models and socio-technical models applied to biomass district heating systems in Austria (1979–2013). Res. Policy, 2016 Submitted.
50. [50] Grin, John, Rothmans, Jan, Schot, Johan, Geels, Frank, Loorbach, Derk, Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. 2010, Routledge, London and New York.
51. [51] Latour, Bruno, Reassembling the Social—An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
52. [52] Deleuze, Gilles, Guattari, Félix, L'Anti-Oedipe: capitalisme et schizophrénie. 1972, Les Editions de Minuit, Paris.
53. [53] Deleuze, Gilles, Guattari, Félix, A Thousand plateaus. Translated by Brian Massumi. 1987, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
54. [54] Deleuze, Gilles, Parnet, Claire, Dialogues. 1987, Columbia University Press, New York.
55. [55] Müller, Martin, Assemblages and Actor-networks: Rethinking Socio-material Power, Politics and Space. Geogr. Compass 9/1 (2015), 27–41.
56. [56] Latour, Bruno, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. 1987, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 160–161.
57. [57] Mahring, Magnus, et al. Trojan actor-networks and swift translation. Inf. Technol. People 17:2 (2004), 210–238.
58. [58] Wong, C.M.L., Assembling interdisciplinary energy research through an Actor Network Theory (ANT) frame. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 12:2016 (2016), 106–110.
59. [59] Latour, Bruno, Johnson, Jim, Mixing Humans with Non-Humans: Sociology of a Door-Opener. Soc. Prob. 35 (1988), 298–310.
60. [60] Risan, Lars Christian, Artificial Life: A Technoscience Leaving Modernity? An Anthropology of Subjects and Objects. 1997, University of Oslo Press, Oslo.
61. [61] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D., User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27:3 (2003), 425–478.
62. [62] Brown, S.A., Venkatesh, V., Model of adoption of technology in households: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household lifecycle. MIS Q. 29:3 (2005), 399–426.
63. [63] Venkatesh, Viswanath, et al. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36:March (1) (2012), 157–178.
64. [64] Marchewka, J.T., Liu, C., Kostiwa, K., An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Commun. IIMA 7:2 (2007), 93–104.
65. [65] Gurtner, Sebastian, Reinhardt, Ronny, Soyez, Katja, Designing mobile business applications for different age groups. Technol. Forecast. Social Change 88 (2014 October), 177–188.
66. [66] Park, J., Yang, S., Lehto, X., Adoption of mobile technologies for Chinese consumers. J. Electron. Comm. Res. 8:3 (2007), 196–206.
67. [67] Lin, C.P., Anol, B., Learning online social support: an investigation of network information technology based on UTAUT. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 11:3 (2008), 268–272.
68. [68] Kijsanayotin, Boonchai, Pannarunothaib, Supasit, Speediec, Stuart M., Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. Int. J. Med. Informatics 78:6 (2009), 404–416.
69. [69] Holden, Richard J., Karsh, Ben-Tzion, The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J. Biomed. Inf. 43:February (1) (2010), 159–172.
70. [70] Chiu, C.-M., Wang, E.T.G., Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: the role of subjective task value. Inf. Manage. 45:3 (2008), 194–201.
71. [71] Martins, Carolina, Oliveira, Tiago, Popovič, Aleš, Understanding the internet banking adoption: a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34:February (1) (2014), 1–13.
72. [72] Zhou, Tao, Lu, Yaobin, Wang, Bin, Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26:July (4) (2010), 760–767.
73. [73] Martín, Héctor San, Herrero, Ángel, Influence of the user's psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism: integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework. Tour. Manage. 33:April (2) (2012), 341–350.
74. [74] Escobar-Rodríguez, T., Carvajal-Trujillo, E., Online purchasing tickets for low cost carriers: an application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Tour. Manage. 43:August (2014), 70–88.
75. [75] Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., Larsen, K.R.T., The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12:50 (2003), 752–780.
76. [76] Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P., Why do people use information technology?. A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manage. 40:3 (2003), 191–204.
77. [77] King, W.R., He, J., A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manage. 43 (2006), 740–755.
78. [78] Bagozzi, R.P., The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8:4 (2007), 244–254.
79. [79] Taiwo, A.A., Downe, A.G., The theory of User Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): a meta-analytic review of empirical findings. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 49:1 (2013), 48–58.
80. [80] Williams, Michael, Rana, Nripendra, Dwivedi, Yogesh, Lal, Banita, Is UTAUT really used or just cited for the sake of it? A systematic review of citations of UTAUT's originating article. ECIS 2011 Proceedings. Paper 231, 2011.
81. [81] Oh, Sujin, Lehto, Xinran Y., Park, Jungkun, Travelers’ intent to use mobile technologies as a function of effort and performance expectancy. J. Hospitality Mark. Manage. 18:8 (2009), 765–781.
82. [82] Lucas, H.C.J., Spitler, V.K., Technology use and performance: a field study of broker workstations. Decis. Sci. 30:2 (1999), 291–311.
83. [83] Schepers, J., Wetzels, M., A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Inf. Manage. 44 (2007), 90–103.
84. [84] Venkatesh, Viswanath, Brown, Susan A., Maruping, Likoebe M., Bala, Hillol, Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Q. 32:Sep (3) (2008), 483–502.
85. [85] Childers, T.L., Carr, C.L., Peck, J., Carson, S., Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. J. Retail. 77:4 (2001), 511–535.
86. [86] Douglas, Mary, Wildavsky, Aaron, Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. 1983, University of California Press, London.
87. [87] Zeithaml, V.A., Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means–end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 52:3 (1988), 2–22.
88. [88] Dodds, W.B., Monroe, K.B., Grewal, D., Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers. J. Mark. Res. 28:3 (1991), 307–319.
89. [89] Limayem, M., Hirt, S.G., Cheung, C.M.K., How habit limits the predictive power of intentions: the case of IS continuance. MIS Q. 31:4 (2007), 705–737.
90. [90] Kim, S.S., Malhotra, N.K., A longitudinal model of continued IS use: an integrative view of four mechanisms underlying post-adoption phenomena. Manage. Sci. 51:5 (2005), 741–755.
91. [91] Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., The influence of attitudes on behavior. Albarracín, D., Johnson, B.T., Zanna, M.P., (eds.) The Handbook of Attitudes, 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 173–221.
92. [92] Zhou, Yan, et al. Plug-in electric vehicle market penetration and incentives: a global review. Mitig. Adapt Strateg. Glob. Change 20 (2015), 777–795.
93. [93] Kihm, Alexander, Trommer, Stefan, The new car market for electric vehicles and the potential for fuel substitution. Energy Policy 73 (2014), 147–157.
94. [94] International Energy Agency, Global EV Outlook: Understanding the Electric Vehicle Landscape to 2020. 2013 April, OECD, Paris.
95. [95] Green, Robert C. II, et al. The impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on distribution networks: a review and outlook. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 15 (2011), 544–553.
96. [96] Galus, M.D., et al. On integration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles into existing power system structures. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 6736–6745.
97. [97] Wolsink, Maarten, The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: renewable as common pool resources. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 16 (2012), 822–835.
98. [98] Axsen, J., et al. Social influence and consumer preference formation for pro-environmental technology: the case of a U.K. workplace electric-vehicle study. Ecol. Econ. 95 (2013), 96–107.
99. [99] Tran, Martino, et al. Realizing the electric-vehicle revolution. Nat. Clim. Change 2 (2012), 328–333.
100. [100] Daziano, Ricardo A., Chiew, Esther, Electric vehicles rising from the dead: data needs for forecasting consumer response toward sustainable energy sources in personal transportation. Energy Policy 51 (2012), 876–894.
101. [101] Mwasilu, F., et al. Electric vehicles and smart grid interaction: a review on vehicle to grid and renewable energy sources integration. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 34 (2014), 501–516.
102. [102] Neubauer, J., et al. Sensitivity of battery electric vehicle economics to drive patterns, vehicle range, and charge strategies. J. Power Sources 209 (2012), 269–277.
103. [103] Axsen, J., Kurani, Kenneth S., Interpersonal influence in the early plug-in hybrid market: observing social interactions with an exploratory multi-method approach. Transp. Res., D 16 (2011), 150–159.
104. [104] Axsen, J., Kurani, Kenneth S., Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric—what do car buyers want?. Energy Policy 61 (2013), 532–543.
105. [105] McCoy, Daire, Lyons, Seán, Consumer preferences and the influence of networks in electric vehicle diffusion: an agent-based microsimulation in Ireland. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 3:September (2014), 89–101.
106. [106] Kahn, Matthew E., Do greens drive hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 54 (2007), 129–145.
107. [107] Graham-Rowe, Ella, et al. Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: a qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations. Transp. Res., A 46 (2012), 140–153.
108. [108] Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., Kinnear, N., The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transp. Res., A: Policy Pract. 48 (2013), 39–49.
109. [109] Sovacool, B.K., Blyth, P.L., Energy and environmental attitudes in the Green state of Denmark: implications for energy democracy, low carbon transitions, and energy literacy. Environ. Sci. Policy 54:December (2015), 304–315.
110. [110] Melton, N., Axsen, J., Sperling, D., Moving beyond alternative fuel hype to decarbonize transportation. Nat. Energy, 1, 2016, 16013.
111. [111] Blank, Mindy, Jones, Kevin, Electric vehicle charging: tariffs and tradeoffs. Public Util. Fortnightly:March (2015), 43–59.
112. [112] Habib, Salman, et al. Impact analysis of vehicle-to-grid technology and charging strategies of electric vehicles on distribution networks—a review. J. Power Sources 277 (2015), 205–214.
113. [113] Adler, Jonathan D., Mirchandani, Pitu B., Xue, Guoliang, Xia, Minjun, The electric vehicle shortest-walk problem with battery exchanges. Networks Spatial Econ. 16:March (1) (2016), 155–173.
114. [114] Franke, Thomas, Krems, Josef F., What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users?. Transport Policy 30:2013 (2013), 56–62.
115. [115] Franke, T., Krems, J.F., Interacting with limited mobility resources: psychological range levels in electric vehicle use. Transp. Res., A: Policy Pract. 48:2013 (2013), 109–122.
116. [116] Franke, T., Neumann, I., Bühler, F., Cocron, P., Krems, J.F., Experiencing range in an electric vehicle: understanding psychological barriers. Appl. Psychol.: Int. Rev. 61 (2012), 368–391.
117. [117] Neubauer, J., Wood, Eric, The impact of range anxiety and home, workplace, and public charging infrastructure on simulated battery electric vehicle lifetime utility. J. Power Sources 257 (2014), 12–20.
118. [118] Egbue, Ona, Long, Suzanna, Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 48 (2012), 717–729.
119. [119] Duigou, A. Le, Guan, Y., Amalric, Y., On the competitiveness of electric driving in France: impact of driving patterns. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 37 (2014), 348–359.
120. [120] Cowan, Robin, Hulten, Staffan, Escaping lock-in: the case of the electric vehicle. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 53 (1996), 61–79.
121. [121] Wells, Peter Erskine, Cipcigan, Liana Mirela, Transition and temporality: the case of personal automobility and electric vehicles. Presented at: International Sustainable Transitions Conference 2012: Navigating Theories and Challenging Realities, Copenhagen, 28 August–2 September 2012, 2012.
122. [122] Nye, David E., Consuming Power: A Social History of American Energies. 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
123. [123] Hirsh, R.F., et al. Wind turbines and invisible technology: unarticulated reasons for local opposition to wind energy. Technol. Cult. 54:October (4) (2013), 705–734.
124. [124] Lewin, K., Frontiers in group dynamics. Cartwright, D., (eds.) Field Theory in Social Science, 1947, Social Science Paperbacks, London.
125. [125] Callon, M., The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle. Callon, M., Law, J., Rip, A., (eds.) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, 1985, Macmillan, London.
126. [126] Dijk, Marc, Technological frames of car engines. Technol. Soc. 33:2011 (2011), 165–180.
127. [127] Jensen, A.F., Cherchi, E., Mabit, S.L., On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transp. Res., D: Trans. Environ. 25:0 (2013), 24–32.
128. [128] Hagman, Olle, Mobilizing meanings of mobility: car users constructions of the goods and bads of car use. Transp. Res., D 8 (2003), 1–9.
129. [129] Costas, Jana, Problematizing mobility: a metaphor of stickiness, non-places and the kinetic elite. Organiz. Stud. 34:10 (2013), 1467–1485.
130. [130] Böhm, Steffen, Jones, Campbell, Land, Chris, Paterson, Mat, Conceptualizing automobility: introduction: impossibilities of automobility. Sociol. Rev. 54:October (Supplement s1) (2006), 1–16.
131. [131] Seiler, Cotton, The ends of automobility. Hist. Technol.: Int. J. 26:4 (2010), 389–397.
132. [132] MacKenzie, Donald, Theories of technology and the abolition of nuclear weapons. MacKenzie, Donald, Wajcman, Judy, (eds.) The Social Shaping of Technology, second ed., 1999, Open University Press, Philadelphia, 419–442.
133. [133] General introduction. Bijker, Wiebe, Law, John, (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, 1992, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1–16.
134. [134] Callon, Michel, Actor-network theory—the market test. Sociol. Rev. 47:May (S1) (1999), 181–195.
135. [135] Whittle, Andrea, Spicer, André, Is actor network theory critique?. Organiz. Stud. 29:4 (2004), 611–629.
136. [136] Wolf, Angelika, Seebauer, Sebastian, Technology adoption of electric bicycles: a survey among early adopters. Transp. Res., A 69 (2014), 196–211.
137. [137] Straub, Evan T., Understanding technology adoption: theory and future directions for informal learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 79:June (2) (2009), 625–649.
138. [138] Im, Il, Hong, Seongtae, Kang, Myung Soo, An international comparison of technology adoption: testing the UTAUT model. Inf. Manage. 48:1 (2011), 1–8.
139. [139] Edgerton, David, The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900. 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
140. [140] Watson, Matt, How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system. J. Transp. Geogr. 24 (2012), 488–496.
141. [141] Dong, Jing, et al. Charging infrastructure planning for promoting battery electric vehicles: an activity-based approach using multiday travel data. Transp. Res., C 38 (2014), 44–55.
142. [142] Feenberg, Andrew, Questioning Technology. 1999, Routledge, New York.
143. [144] Pasaoglu, G., Fiorello, D., Martino, A., Zani, L., Zubaryeva, A., Thiel, C., Travel patterns and the potential use of electric cars – Results from a direct survey in six European countries. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 87 (2014), 51–59.
144. [145] Ajzen, I., Residual effects of past on later behavior: habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6:2 (2002), 107–122.
145. [146] Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13:3 (1989), 319–339.
146. [147] Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R., User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35:8 (1989), 982–1002.
147. [148] Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J., Warshaw, P.R., The theory of reasoned action: a meta analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J. Consum. Res. 15:3 (1988), 325–343.
148. [149] Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. 1975, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
149. [150] Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 45:2 (2000), 186–204.
150. [151] Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., Computer technology training in the workplace: a longitudinal investigation of the effect of the mood. Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 79:1 (1999), 1–28.
151. [152] Vallerand, R.J., Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Zanna, M., (eds.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 29, 1997, Academic Press, New York, 271–360.
152. [153] Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R., Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22:14 (1992), 1111–1132.
153. [154] Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: reasoned and automatic processes. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 11:1 (2000), 1–33.
154. [155] Taylor, S., Todd, P.A., Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Q. 19:2 (1995), 561–570.
155. [156] Taylor, S., Todd, P.A., Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 6:4 (1995), 144–176.
156. [157] Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior. Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50:2 (1991), 179–211.
157. [158] Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., Howell, J.M., Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q. 15:1 (1991), 124–143.
158. [159] Triandis, H.C., Interpersonal Behavior. 1977, Brooke/Cole, Monterey, CA.
159. [160] Rogers, E.M., Shoemaker, F.F., Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach. 1971, Free Press, New York.
160. [161] Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I., Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2:3 (1991), 192–222.
161. [162] Rogers, E., Diffusion of Innovations. 1995, Free Press, New York.
162. [163] Agarwal, R., Prasad, J., The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decis. Sci. 28:3 (1997), 557–582.
163. [164] Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease of use. Inf. Manage. 35:4 (1999), 237–250.
164. [165] Plouffe, C.R., Hulland, J.S., Vandenbosch, M., Research report: richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions-understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Inf. Syst. Res. 12:2 (2001), 208–222.
165. [166] Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A., Huff, S., Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Q. 23:2 (1999), 145–158.
166. [167] Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A., Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inf. Syst. Res. 6:2 (1995), 118–143.
167. [168] Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A., Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 19:2 (1995), 189–211.
168. [169] Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. 1986, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
169. [170] Mort, Maggie, Building the Trident Network: A Study of the Enrollment of People, Knowledge, and Machines. 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.