What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users?

Transport Policy

Volumn 30, Issue , 2013, Pages 56-62

  Franke, Thomas ^a   Krems, Josef F ^a  

^a CHEMNITZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Electric vehicle; Field study; Mobility needs; Preferences; Range; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC VEHICLE; ESTIMATION METHOD; MOBILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSPORTATION MODE;

EID: 84884197301     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ADAC, 2013. ADAC Elektromobilität 2013. Umfrage im Auftrag des ADAC Technik Zentrums (Landsberg am Lech). Available from: http://www.konferenz-elektromobilitaet.de/programm/vortraege/Umfrage-Elektromobilitaet-2013.pdf.
2. Bronchard, S., McGuinness, M., Narich, C., Noom, M., Raut, C., Schutz, M., Stark, M., Ubbink, P., Viglino, M., Vos, A., 2011. Plug-in electric vehicles: changing perceptions, Hedging Bets. Available from: http://www.accenture.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/Resources/Accenture_Plug-in_Electric_Vehicle_Consumer_Perceptions.pdf.
3. Bunzeck, I., Feenstra, C.F.J., Paukovic, M., 2011. Preferences of potential users of electric cars related to charging - a survey in eight EU countries. Available from: http://www.d-incert.nl/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/rapportage_ECN.pdf.
4. Chlond, B., Kagerbauer, M., Vortisch, P., Wirges, J., 2012. Market potential for electric vehicles from a travel behavior perspective. In: Proceedings of the 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 21-26, 2011, Washington, DC.
5. Cocron P., Bühler F., Neumann I., Franke T., Krems J.F., Schwalm M., Keinath A. Methods of evaluating electric vehicles from a user's perspective - the MINI E field trial in Berlin. IET Intelligent Transport Systems 2011, 5(2):127-133.
6. Collins A.M., Loftus E.F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 1975, 82(6):407-428.
7. Daziano R.A. Conditional-logit Bayes estimators for consumer valuation of electric vehicle driving range. Resource and Energy Economics 2013, 35(3):429-450.
8. Dimitropoulos, A., Rietveld, P., van Ommeren, J.N., 2011. Consumer valuation of driving range: a meta-analysis. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, vol. 133 (3), pp. 1-35.
9. Franke T., Bühler F., Cocron P., Neumann I., Krems J.F. Enhancing sustainability of electric vehicles: a field study approach to understanding user acceptance and behavior. Advances in Traffic Psychology 2012, 295-306. Ashgate, Farnham, UK. M. Sullman, L. Dorn (Eds.).
10. Franke, T., Cocron, P., Bühler, F., Neumann, I., Krems, J.F., 2012b. Adapting to the range of an electric vehicle - the relation of experience to subjectively available mobility resources. In: Valero Mora, P., Pace, J.F., Mendoza, L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, Valencia, Spain, June 14-15 2012. Humanist Publications, Lyon, France, pp. 95-103.
11. Franke T., Krems J.F. Interacting with limited mobility resources: psychological range levels in electric vehicle use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2013, 48:109-122.
12. Franke T., Neumann I., Bühler F., Cocron P., Krems J.F. Experiencing range in an electric vehicle: understanding psychological barriers. Applied Psychology 2012, 61(3):368-391.
13. Giffi, C., Hill, R., Gardner, M., Hasegawa, M., 2010. Gaining traction: a customer view of electric vehicle mass adoption in the US automotive market. Available from: http://www.deloitte.com.br/publicacoes/2007/MFG.Gaining_Traction_customer_view_of_electric_vehicle_mass_adoption.pdf.
14. Giffi, C., Vitale Jr., J., Drew, M., Kuboshima, Y., Sase, M., 2011. Unplugged: electric vehicle realities versus consumer expectations. Available from: http://www.deloitte.com/electricvehicle.
15. Greene D.L. Estimating daily vehicle usage distributions and the implications for limited-range vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1985, 19(4):347-358.
16. Grubbs F.E. Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics 1969, 11(1):1-21.
17. Hoen, A., Koetse, M.J., 2012. A choice experiment on AFV preferences of private car owners in The Netherlands. PBL Working, Paper 3, pp. 1-46.
18. infas, DLR, 2010. Mobilität in Deutschland: Ergebnisbericht. Available from: http://mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de/02_MiD2008/publikationen.htm.
19. Krumm, J., 2012. How people use their vehicles: statistics from the 2009 national household travel survey, SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0489.
20. Kurani K.S., Turrentine T.S., Sperling D. Demand for electric vehicles in hybrid households: an exploratory analysis. Transport Policy 1994, 1(4):244-256.
21. McManus M.C. Environmental consequences of the use of batteries in low carbon systems: the impact of battery production. Applied Energy 2012, 93:288-295.
22. Meng X.-L., Rosenthal R., Rubin D.B. Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 111:172-175.
23. Miller K., Hofstetter R., Krohmer H., Zhang Z.J. How should consumers' willingness to pay be measured? An empirical comparison of state-of-the-art approaches. Journal of Marketing Research 2011, 48(1):172-184.
24. miniusa.com, 2012. MINI E specifications. Available from: http://www.miniusa.com/minie-usa/pdf/MINI-E-spec-sheet.pdf.
25. Neubauer J., Brooker A., Wood E. Sensitivity of battery electric vehicle economics to drive patterns, vehicle range, and charge strategies. Journal of Power Sources 2012, 209:269-277.
26. Nilsson, M., 2011. Electric vehicle: the phenomenon of range anxiety. Available from: http://www.elvire.eu/IMG/pdf/The_phenomenon_of_range_anxiety_ELVIRE.pdf.
27. Öko-Institut, 2011. Autos unter Strom. Available from: http://www.oeko.de/oekodoc/1283/2011-413-de.pdf.
28. Pearre N.S., Kempton W., Guensler R.L., Elango V.V. Electric vehicles: how much range is required for a day's driving?. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2011, 19(6):1171-1184.
29. Peters E. The functions of affect in the construction of preferences. The Construction of Preference 2006, 454-463. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. S. Lichtenstein, P. Slovic (Eds.).
30. Pichelmann, S., Franke, T., Krems, J., 2013. The Timeframe of Adaptation to Electric Vehicle Range, Manuscript submitted for publication.
31. Rodriguez, A., Page, C., 2004. A comparison of Toyota and Honda hybrid vehicle marketing strategies. Available from: http://www.linxus.co.kr/lib/download.asp?post_file_seq_no=27505&targettype=club&targetid=japaneconomy.
32. Sammer G., Stark J., Link C. Einflussfaktoren auf die Nachfrage nach Elektroautos. Elektrotechnik & Informationstechnik 2011, 128:22-27.
33. Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. Status Quo Bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1988, 1:7-59.
34. Schwarz N. Attitude construction: evaluation in context. Social Cognition 2007, 25(5):638-656.
35. Slovic P. The construction of preference. American Psychologist 1995, 50(5):364-371.
36. Stade M., Meyer C., Niestroj N., Nachtwei J. (Not) Everybody's darling: value and prospects of Multiple Linear Regression Analysis and assumption checking. Empirische Evaluationsmethoden Band 2011, vol. 15:17-34. ZeE Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
37. TÜV Rheinland, 2011. Results of the representative survey on the acceptance of electric cars. Available from: http://www.dincertco.de/web/media_get.php?mediaid=35741&fileid=86473&sprachid=2.
38. Urban D., Mayerl J. Regressionsanalyse: Theorie, Technik und Anwendung 2008, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany. 3rd ed.
39. VDE, 2010. E-Mobility 2020. Available from: http://www.vde.com/de/E-Mobility/Seiten/VDEStudieEMobility2020.aspx.
40. Vilimek, R., Keinath, A., Schwalm, M., 2012. The MINI E field study - similarities and differences in international everyday driving. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference Applied on Human Factors and Ergonomics, July 21-25 2012, San Fancisco, CA.
41. Warren C., McGraw A.P., Van Boven L. Values and preferences: defining preference construction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science 2011, 2(2):193-205.
42. Weber E.U., Johnson E.J. Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:53-85.
43. Zpryme, 2010. The electric vehicle study. Available from: http://www.zpryme.com/SmartGridInsights/The_Electric_Vehicle_Study_Zpryme_Smart_Grid_Insights_Airbiquity_Sponsor_December_2010.pdf.
44. Zumkeller, D., Vortisch, P., Kagerbauer, M., Chlond, B., Streit, T., Wirtz, M., 2011. Deutsches Mobilitätspanel (MOP) - wissenschaftliche Begleitung und erste Auswertungen. Bericht 2011: Alltagsmobilität & Tankbuch. Available from: http://daten.clearingstelle-verkehr.de/192/85/Bericht_MOP_10_11.pdf.