Cultural politics in action: Developing user scripts in relation to the electric vehicle

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 262-281

  Gjøen, Heidi ^a   Hård, Mikael ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037780582     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016224390202700204     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Akrich, M. 1992. The de-scription of technical objects. In Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 205-24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. _. 1995. User representations: Practices, methods and sociology. In Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment, edited by A. Rip, T. J. Misa, and J. Schot, 167-84. London: Pinter.
3. Akrich, M., and B. Latour. 1992. A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 259-64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Almond, G. A. 1980. The civic culture revisited: An analytic study. Boston: Little, Brown.
5. Bauhardt, C. 1995. Stadtentwicklung und Verkehrspolitik. Eine Analyse aus feministischer Sicht. Berlin, Germany: Birkhäuser.
6. Bijker, W. E. 1995. Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Bourdieu, P. 1986. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
8. Buland, T., H. Gjøen, and M. Hård. 1996. The electric vehicle in Norway: Scenarios and user patterns. STS working paper 12/96. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
9. Callon, M. 1987. Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In The social construction of technological systems: New direction in the sociology and history of technology, edited by W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, 83-103. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Fogelberg, H. 1996. Aktörer, argument och aktiviteter i den kalifomiska elbilsdebatten. KFB-Meddelande 1996:11. Stockholm, Sweden: Kommunikationsforskningsberedningen.
11. Gjøen, H., and T. Buland. 1996. Energiteknologiske dilemmaer - Utvikling av gassbuss og elektrisk bil i Norge. Report STF38 A96505. Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF/IFIM.
12. Hård, M, and A. Jamison, eds. 1998. The intellectual appropriation of technology: Discourses on modernity, 1900-1939. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Hård, M., and A. Knie. 1994. The ruler of the game: The defining power of the standard automobile. In The car and its environments: The past, present and future of the motorcar in Europe, edited by K. H. Sørensen, 137-58. Brussels, Belgium: The European Commission.
14. Knie, A., and O. Berthold. 1995. Das ceteris-paribus Syndrom in der Mobilitätspolitik. Tatsächliche Nutzungsprofile von elektrischen Straßenfahrzeugen. Discussion paper FS II 95-104. Berlin, Germany: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
15. Knie, A., O. Berthold, S. Harms, and B. Truffer. 1999. Die Neuerfindung urbaner Automobilität. Elektroautos und ihr Gebrauch in den U.S.A. und Europa. Berlin, Germany: Edition Sigma.
16. Knie, A., O. Berthold, M. Hård,T. Buland, H. Gjøen,M. Quere, W. Streicher, B. Truffer, and S. Harms. 1997. Consumer user patterns of electric vehicles. Discussion paper FS II 97-105. Berlin, Germany: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
17. Latour, B. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
18. _. 1992. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 225-58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Lie, M., and K. H. Sørensen, eds. 1996. Making technology our own ? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavia University Press.
20. McCracken, G. 1988. The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Mom, G. 1997. Geschiedenis van de auto van morgen. Cultuur en techniek van de elektrische auto. Deventer, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
22. Perrin, N. 1994. Life with an electric car. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
23. Pfaffenberger, B. 1992. Technological dramas. Science, Technology, & Human Values 17:282-312.
24. Relling, S. 1997. "Not to change, but improve the world ...": Images of the Norwegian electric vehicle City Bee, and scenarios for its viability in the Norwegian transport system. Master'S thesis, University of Oslo and Rijksuniversiteit Limburg.
25. Schuler, D., and A. Namioka. 1993. Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Schumacher, E. F. 1973. Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. London: Blond & Briggs.
27. Sørensen, K. H., ed. 1998. The spectre of participation: Technology and work in a welfare state. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
28. TH!NK Mobility. 2001. Home page. Available: http://www.pivco.no/mainframe30.htm
29. Truffer, B., and G. Dürrenberger. 1997. Outsider initiatives in the reconstruction of the car: The case of lightweight vehicle milieus in Switzerland. Science, Technology, & Human Values 22:207-34.
30. Weyer, J., U. Kirchner, L. Riedl, and J.F.K. Schmidt. 1997. Technik, die Gesellschaft schafft. Soziale Netzwerke als Ort der Technikgenese. Berlin, Germany: Edition Sigma.