The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: Ameta-analytic review

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue , 2014, Pages 359-371

  Kormos, Christine ^a   Gifford, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behavior; Meta analysis; Objective; Observed; Proenvironmental; Self report

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908352533     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: 15229610     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Affuso O., Stevens J., Catellier D., McMurray R.G., Ward D.S., Lytle L., et al. Validity of self-reported leisure-time sedentary behavior in adolescents. Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine 2011, 10:2. 10.1186/1477-5751-10-2.
2. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Action control: From cognition to behavior 1985, 11-39. Springer-Verlag, New York. J. Kuhl, J. Beckham (Eds.).
3. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality and behavior 2005, McGraw-Hill International (UK) Ltd, Maidenhead.
4. Armitage C.J., Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 40:471-499. 10.1348/014466601164939.
5. Barr S. Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviours: A U.K. case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior 2007, 39:435-473. 10.1177/0013916505283421.
6. Boldero J. The prediction of household recycling of newspapers: The role of attitudes, intentions, and situational factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1995, 25:440-462. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01598.x.
7. Bolderdijk J.W., Knockaert J., Steg E.M., Verhoef E.T. Effects of Pay-As-You-Drive vehicle insurance on young drivers' speed choice: Results of a Dutch field experiment. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2011, 43:1181-1186. 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.032.
8. Borenstein M., Hedges L., Higgins J., Rothstein H. Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2 2005, Boistat, Englewood, NJ.
9. Brener N.D., Billy J.O.G., Grady W.R. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: Evidence from the scientific literature. Journal of Adolescent Health 2003, 33:436-457. 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00052-1.
10. Chao Y.-L., Lam S.-P. Measuring responsible environmental behavior: Self-reported and other-reported measures and their differences in testing a behavioral model. Environment & Behavior 2011, 43:53-71. 10.1177/0013916509350849.
11. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey. 2nd ed.
12. Cohen J. Apower primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112:155-159. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
13. Corral-Verdugo V. Dual "realities" of conservation behavior: Self-reports vs. observations of reuse and recycling behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1997, 17:135-145. 10.1006/jevp.1997.0048.
14. Corral-Verdugo V., Bernache G., Encinas L., Garibaldi L.C. Acomparison of two measures of reuse and recycling behavior: Self-report and material culture. Journal of Environmental Systems 1995, 23:313-327.
15. Corral-Verdugo V., Bechtel R.B., Fraijo-Sing B. Environmental beliefs and water conservation: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2003, 23:247-257. 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00086-5.
16. Corral-Verdugo V., Figueredo A.J. Convergent and divergent validity of three measures of conservation behavior: The multitrait-multimethod approach. Environment & Behavior 1999, 31:805-820. 10.1177/00139169921972353.
17. Cote J.A. Use of household refuse analysis to measure usual and period-specific food consumption. American Behavioral Scientist 1984, 28:129-138. 10.1177/000276484028001010.
18. De Young R. Promoting conservation behavior in shared spaces: The role of energy monitors. Journal of Environmental Systems 1990, 19:265-273.
19. Denny S.J., Milfont T.L., Utter J., Robinson E.M., Ameratunga S.N., Merry S.N., et al. Hand-held internet tablets for school-based data collection. BMC Research Notes 2008, 1:52. 10.1186/1756-0500-1-52.
20. Edwards A.L. The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research 1957, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
21. Elgar F.J., Stewart J.M. Validity of self-report screening for overweight and obesity: Evidence from the Canadian community health survey. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2008, 99:423-427. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/docview/232005343?accountid=14846.
22. Evans G.W. Measurement of the physical environment as stressor. Assessment of the environment across the lifespan 1999, 249-277. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. S.L. Friedman, T.D. Wachs (Eds.).
23. Fuj E.T., Hennessy M., Mak J. An evaluation of the validity and reliability ofsurvey response data on household electricity conservation. Evaluation Review 1985, 9:93-104. 10.1177/0193841X8500900106.
24. Gatersleben B., Steg L., Vlek C. Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior 2002, 34:335-362. 10.1177/0013916502034003004.
25. Geller E.S. Evaluating energy conservation programs: Is verbal report enough?. Journal of Consumer Research 1981, 8:331-335. Retrieved from. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488892.
26. Gifford R. Ageneral model of social dilemmas. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics 2006, 5:23-40.
27. Hamilton L.C. Self-reported and actual savings in a water conservation campaign. Environment & Behavior 1985, 17:315-326. 10.1177/0013916585173003.
28. Hirst E., Goeltz R. Accuracy of self-reports: Energy conservation surveys. The Social Science Journal 1985, 22:19-30.
29. Heath Y., Gifford R. Extending the theory of planned behavior: Predicting the use of public transportation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2002, 32:2154-2185. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02068.x.
30. Hemphill J.F. Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist 2003, 58:78-80. 10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.78.
31. Hurst M., Dittmar H., Bond R., Kasser T. The relationship between materialistic values and environmental attitudes and behaviours: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2013, 36:257-269. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.003.
32. Kaiser F.G., Doka G., Hofstetter P., Ranney M.A. Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: A life cycle assessment of a self-report measure. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2003, 23:11-20. 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00075-0.
33. Kaiser F.G., Ranney M., Hartig T., Bowler P.A. Ecological behavior, environmental attitude, and feelings of responsibility for the environment. European Psychologist 1999, 4:59-74.
34. Kaiser F.G., Frick J., Stoll-Kleemann S. Zur Angemessenheit selbstberichteten Verhaltens: Eine Validitätsuntersuchung der Skala Allgemeinen Ökologischen Verhaltens. Diagnostica 2001, 47:88-95.
35. Khemlani S., Johnson-Laird P.N. Theories of the syllogism: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2012, 138:427-457. 10.1037/a0026841.
36. Klockars A.J., Yamagishi M. The influence of labels and positions in rating scales. Journal of Educational Measurement 1988, 25:85-96. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00294.x.
37. Krosnick J.A., Berent M.K. Comparisons of party identification and policy preferences: The impact of survey question format. American Journal of Political Science 1993, 37:941-964. 10.2307/2111580.
38. Krosnick J.A., Judd C.M., Wittenbrink B. The measurement of attitudes. The Handbook of attitudes 2005, 21-78. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J. D. Albarracin, B.T. Johnson, M.P. Zanna (Eds.).
39. Lam S.-P., Cheng S.-I. Cross-informant agreement in reports of environmental behavior and the effect of cross-questioning on report accuracy. Environment and Behavior 2002, 34:508-520. 10.1177/00116502034004006.
40. Lee Y.-J. Recycling behavior and waste management planning. Journal of Building and Planning National Taiwan University 1993, 7:65-77.
41. Lipsey M.W., Wilson D.B. The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist 1993, 48:1181-1209. 10.1037/0003-066X.48.12.1181.
42. Luyben P.D. Prompting thermostat setting behavior. Environment and Behavior 1982, 14:113-128. 10.1177/0013916582141007.
43. McCormack G.R., Cerin E., Leslie E., du Toit L., Owen N. Objective versus perceived walking distances to destinations: Correspondence and predictive validity. Environment and Behavior 2008, 40:401-425. 10.1177/0013916507300560.
44. McGuire R.H. Recycling, great expectations and garbage outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist 1984, 28:71-91. 10.1177/000276428402800107.
45. Margai F.L. Analyzing changes in waste reduction behavior in a low-income urban community following a public outreach program. Environment and Behavior 1997, 29:769-792. 10.1177/0013916597296003.
46. Meyer G.J., Finn S.E., Eyde L.D., Kay G.G., Moreland K.L., Dies R.R., et al. Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist 2001, 56:128-165. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.128.
47. Milfont T.L. The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. The Environmentalist 2009, 29:263-269. 10.1007/s10669-008-9192-2.
48. Moxey L.M., Sanford A.J. Context effects and the communicative functions of quantifiers: Implications for their use in attitude research. Context effects in social and psychological research 1992, 279-296. Springer Verlag, New York. N. Schwarz, S. Sudman (Eds.).
49. Nencyz-Thiel M., Beal V., Ludwichowska G., Romaniuk J. Investigating the accuracy of self-reports of brand usage behavior. Journal of Business Research 2013, 66:224-232. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.07.016.
50. Olson M.E. Consumers attitudes toward energy conservation. Journal of Social Issues 1981, 37:108-131.
51. Peterson R.A., Kerin R. The quality of self-report data: Review and synthesis. Annual review of marketing 1981, 5-20. American Marketing Association, Chicago. B. Enis, K. Roering (Eds.).
52. Porter B.E., Leeming F.C., Dwyer W.O. Solid waste recovery: A review of behavioral programs to increase recycling. Environment & Behavior 1995, 27:122-152. 10.1177/0013916595272002.
53. Rathje W.L. The three faces of garbage - Measurements, perceptions, behaviors. Journal of Management and Technology 1989, 17:61-65.
54. Richard F.D., Bond C.F., Stokes-Zoota J.J. One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology 2003, 7:331-363. 10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331.
55. Rolnick S.J., Parker E.D., Nordin J.D., Hedblom B.D., Wei F., Kerby T., et al. Self-report compared to electronic medical record across eight adult vaccines: Do results vary by demographic factors?. Vaccine 2013, 31:3928-3935. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.041.
56. Rosenthal R. The 'file drawer problem' and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:638-641. doi: 0.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.
57. Rosenthal R., Rubin D.B. Anote on percent variance explained as a measure of the importance of effects. Journal of Applied Psychology 1979, 9:395-396. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1979.tb02713.x.
58. Rosenthal R., Rubin D.B. Asimple general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology 1982, 74:166-169. 10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.166.
59. Schahn J. The role of behavioral costs and social desirability as predictors of environmental attitudes and conservation behavior: An analysis on aggregate and on individual data level. Zeitschrift fur Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 2002, 23:45-54.
60. Schwarz N. Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist 1999, 54:93-105. 10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93.
61. Schwarz N., Sudman S. Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports 1994, Springer Verlag, New York.
62. Schwarz N., Strack F., Müller G., Chassein B. The range of response alternatives may determine the meaning of the question: Further evidence on informative functions of response alternatives. Social Cognition 1988, 6:107-117. 10.1521/soco.1988.6.2.107.
63. Stanton M.D., Shadish W.R. Outcome, attrition, and family-couples treatment for drug abuse: A meta-analysis and review of the controlled, comparative studies. Psychological Bulletin 1997, 122:170-191. 10.1037/0033-2909.122.2.170.
64. Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research Agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009, 29:309-317.
65. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Kalof L., Guagnano G.A. Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1995, 25:1611-1636. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02636.x.
66. Stern P.C., Oskamp S. Managing scarce environmental resources. Handbook of environmental psychology 1987, 1043-1088. Wiley, New York. D. Stokols, I. Altman (Eds.).
67. Studts J.L., Ghate S.R., Gill J.L., Studts C.R., Barnes C.N., Lajoie A.S., et al. Validity of self-reported smoking status among participants in a lung cancer screening trial. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2006, 15:1825-1828. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0393.
68. Sudman S., Bradburn N.M. Response effects in surveys 1974, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.
69. Sudman S., Bradburn N.M., Schwarz N. Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology 1996, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
70. Tarrant M.A., Cordell H.K. The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude-behavior correspondence. Environment & Behavior 1997, 29:618-637. 10.1177/0013916597295002.
71. Vadez V., Reyes-Garcia V., Godoy R., Williams L., Apaza L., Byron E., et al. Validity of self-reports to measure deforestation: Evidence from the Bolivian Lowlands. Field Methods 2003, 15:289-304. 10.1177/1525822X03254847.
72. Van den Bussche E., Van den Noortgate W., Reynvoet B. Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2009, 135:452-477. 10.1037/a0015329.
73. Van Liere K.D., Dunlap R.E. The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly 1980, 44:181-197. Retrieved from. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2748427.
74. Warriner G.K., McDougall G.H.C., Claxton J.D. Any data or none at all? Living with inaccuracies in self-reports of residential energy consumption. Environment & Behavior 1984, 16:503-526. 10.1177/0013916584164005.
75. Weinhardt L.S., Forsyth A.D., Carey M.P., Jaworski B.C., Durant L.E. Reliability and validity of self-report measures of HIV-related sexual behaviour: Progress since 1990 and recommendations for research and practice. Archives of Sexual Behavior 1998, 27:155-180. 10.1023/A:1018682530519.
76. Winkielman P., Knäuper B., Schwarz N. Looking back at anger: Reference periods change the interpretation of (emotion) frequency questions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:719-728. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.719.
77. Zelezny L.C., Chua P.-P., Aldrich C. Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56:443-457. 10.1111/0022-4537.00177.