Mobilizing meanings of mobility: Car users' constructions of the goods and bads of car use

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-9

  Hagman, Olle ^a  

^a Science and Technology Studies   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; PASSENGER CARS; WEATHERING;

PUBLIC DISCOURSES;

TRANSPORTATION;

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; CAR USE; MOBILITY; PUBLIC ATTITUDE;

SWEDEN;

EID: 0037214166     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00014-7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Beck, U., 1992. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. Sage, London.
2. Bernard, H.R., 1994. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative approaches. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek.
3. Callon, M., 1987. Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In: Bijker, W., Hughes, T., Pinch, T. (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.
4. Hagman, O., 2000. Bilen, naturen och det moderna. Om natursynens omvandlingar i det svenska bilsamhället (The automobile, Nature, and Modernity. On the transformations of the conceptions of nature in Swedish automobile society). KFB, Stockholm.
5. Ingold, T., 1992. Culture and the perception of the environment. In: Croll, E., Parkin, D. (Eds.), Bush, Base: Forest Farm, Culture, Environment and Development. Routledge, London.
6. Jamison, A., 1996. The shaping of the global environmental agenda: the role of non-governmental organisations. In: Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., Wynne, B. (Eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology. Sage, London.
7. Johansson, M., 2000. Identification and promotion of attitudes related to pro-environmental travel behaviour. Lund University of Technology, Environmental Psychology Unit, Lund.
8. Laclau, E., Mou.e, C., 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso, London.
9. Latour, B., 1999. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.
10. Leiss, W., Kline, S., Jhally, S., 1986. Social Communication in Advertising. Persons, Products, and Images of Wellbeing. Methuen, Toronto.
11. Nelkin, D., 1992. Science, technology, and political conflict: analyzing the issues. In: Nelkin, D. (Ed.), Controversy. Politics of Technical Decisions: Third Edition. Sage, Newbury Park.
12. Pinch, T., Bijker, W., 1987. The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In: Bijker, W., Hughes, T., Pinch, T. (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Polk, M., 1998. Gendered mobility. A study of women's and men's relation to utomobility in Sweden. Göteborgs universitet, Human Ecology Section, Göteborg.
14. Spradley, J.P., 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
15. Wynne, B., 1996. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., Wynne, B. (Eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology. Sage, London.