A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model

Information and Management

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 740-755

  King, William R ^a   He, Jun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral intention; Ease of use; Meta analysis; Perceived usefulness; TAM; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

META ANALYSIS; MODERATOR ANALYSIS; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS (PU); ROBUST MODEL; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM);

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 33747857358     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Barker D.J., Van Schaik P., Simpson D.S., and Corbett W.A. Evaluating a spoken dialogue system for recording clinical observations during an endoscopic examination. Medical Informatics and The Internet in Medicine 28 2 (2003) 85-97 *
2. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. second ed. (1988), Academic, New York
3. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112 1 (1992) 155-159
4. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 3 (1989) 318-340 *
5. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshwa P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989) 982-1003 *
6. Davis F.D., and Venkatesh V. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45 1 (1996) 19-45 *
7. Davis F.D., and Venkatesh V. Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51 1 (2004) 31-46 *
8. Deng X., Doll W.J., Hendrickson A.R., and Scazzero J.A. A multi-group analysis of structural invariance: an illustration using the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 42 5 (2005) 745-759
9. Dishaw M.T., and Strong D.M. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management 36 1 (1999) 9-21 *
10. Eden D., and Aviv T. From the editors: replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ's publication policy. Academy of Management Journal 45 5 (2002) 841-846
11. Featherman M.S., and Pavlou P.A. Predicting E-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 4 (2003) 451-474 *
12. Field A.P. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods 6 2 (2001) 161-180
13. Field A.P. The problem in using fixed-effects models of meta-analysis on real-world data. Understanding Statistics 2 2 (2003) 105
14. Fishbein M., and Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975), Addison-Wesley, California
15. Gefen D. What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness. Journal of Management Information Systems 21 1 (2004) 263-288 *
16. Gefen D., Karahanna E., and Straub D.W. Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50 3 (2003) 307-321 *
17. Glass G.V. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 5 (1976) 3-8
18. Hardgrave B.C., Davis F.D., and Riemenschneider C.K. Investigating determinants of software developers' intentions to follow methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems 20 1 (2003) 123-151 *
19. Hedges L.V., and Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1985), Academic Press
20. Horton R.P., Buck T., Waterson P.E., and Clegg C.W. Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model. Journal of Information Technology 16 4 (2001) 237-249 *
21. Howard A. Rapid application development: rough and dirty or value-for-money engineering?. Communications of the ACM 45 10 (2002) 27-30
22. Hu P.J., Chau P.Y.K., Sheng O.R.L., and Tam K.Y. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 16 2 (1999) 91-112 *
23. Huang L.J., Lu M.T., and Wong B.K. The impact of power distance on Email acceptance: evidence from the PRC. Journal of Computer Information Systems 44 1 (2003) 93-101 *
24. Hunter J.E., and Schmidt F.L. Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (1990), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
25. Jackson C.M., Chow S., and Leitch R.A. Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision Sciences 28 2 (1997) 357-389 *
26. King W.R., and Cleland D.I. Manager analyst teamwork in management information systems. Business Horizons 14 2 (1971) 59
27. King W.R., and He J. Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the AIS 16 (October 2005) 665-686 Article 32
28. Legris P., Ingham J., and Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 40 3 (2003) 191-204
29. Ma Q., and Liu L. The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 16 1 (2004) 59-72
30. Moon J.W., and Kim Y.G. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management 38 4 (2001) 217-230
31. Oh S., Ang J., and Kim B. Adoption of broadband internet in Korea: the role of experience in building attitudes. Journal of Information Technology 18 4 (2003) 267-280 *
32. Osburn H.G., and Callender J. A note on the sampling variance of the mean uncorrected correlation in meta-analysis and validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology 77 2 (1992) 115-122
33. Pavlou P.A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7 3 (2003) 101-134 *
34. Plouffe C.R., Hulland J.S., and Vandenbosch M. Research Report: richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions-understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information Systems Research 12 2 (2001) 208-222 *
35. Riemenschneider C.K., Hardgrave B.C., and Davis F.D. Explaining software developer acceptance of methodologies: a comparison of five theoretical models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28 12 (2002) 1135-1145 *
36. Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research. Rev. ed. (1991), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
37. Rosenthal R., and DiMatteo M.R. Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology 52 1 (2001) 59-82
38. Schmidt F.L., and Hunter J.E. Comparison of three meta-analysis methods revisited: an analysis of Johnson, Mullen and Salas. Journal of Applied Psychology 84 1 (1999) 144-148
39. Schultz R.L., and Slevin D.P. The implementation profile. Interfaces 13 1 (1983) 87-92
40. Straub D., Keil M., and Brenner W. Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study. Information & Management 33 1 (1997) 1-11 *
41. Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science 42 1 (1996) 85-92 *
42. Tudhope D., Beynon-Davis P., and Mackay H. Prototyping Praxis: constructing computer systems and building belief. Human-Computer Interaction 15 4 (2000) 353-384
43. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11 4 (2000) 342-365 *
44. Venkatesh V., and Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 2 (2000) 186-204 *
45. Venkatesh V., and Morris M.G. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly 24 1 (2000) 115-139 *
46. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 3 (2003) 425-478 *
47. Wolf F.M. Meta-analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis (1986), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA