Trojan actor-networks and swift translation: Bringing actor-network theory to IT project escalation studies

Information Technology & People

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 210-238

  Mähring, Magnus ^a   Keil, Mark ^a   Holmström, Jonny ^b   Montealegre, Ramiro ^c  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Case studies; Information networks; Management failures; Technology led strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986160840     PISSN: 09593845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09593840410542510     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Akrich, M. (1992), “The description of technical objects”, in Ed. Bijker, W.E. and Ed. Law, J. (Eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 205-24.
2. Akrich, M. and Latour, B. (1992), “A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and non-human assemblies”, in Ed. Bijker, W.E. and Ed. Law, J. (Eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 259-64.
3. Alvesson, M. and Sköldberg, K. (2000), Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. Applegate, L.M. (1999), “BAE automated systems: (A) and (B)”, Harvard Business School Teaching Note, No. 5-399-099, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA.
5. Bouton, J. (1993), “State-of-the-art baggage system for Denver”, Airport Forum, February.
6. Brockner, J. (1992), “The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: toward theoretical progress”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 39-61.
7. Brockner, J. and Rubin, J.Z. (1985), Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts: A Social Psychological Analysis, Springer Verlag, New York, NY.
8. Callon, M. (1985), “The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle”, in Ed. Callon, M., Ed. Law, J. and Ed. Rip, A. (Eds), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, Macmillan, London.
9. Callon, M. (1986), “Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay”, in Ed. Law, J. (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 196-233.
10. Callon, M. (1991), “Techno-economic networks and irreversibility”, in Ed. Law, J. (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London, pp. 132-61.
11. Callon, M. and Latour, B. (1981), “Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so”, in Ed. Knorr-Cetina, K. and Ed. Cicourel, A.V. (Eds), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 277-303.
12. Eisenhardt, K. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532-50.
13. Ewusi-Mensah, K. and Przasnyski, Z.H. (1991), “On information systems project abandonment: an exploratory study of organizational practices”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 67-86.
14. Goodman, P.S., Bazerman, M. and Conlon, E. (1980), “Institutionalization of planned organizational change”, in Ed. Staw, B.M. and Ed. Cummings, L.L. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 215-46.
15. Hansen, A. and Mouritsen, J. (1999), “”Managerial technology and netted networks”, Organization, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 451-71.
16. Hanseth, O. and Monteiro, E. (1997), “Inscribing behavior in information infrastructure standards”, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 183-211.
17. Hanseth, O. and Monteiro, E. (1998), “Changing irreversible networks”, Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Information Systems, Aix-en-Provence, June 4-6.
18. Holmström, J. and Stalder, F. (2001), “Drifting technologies and multi-purpose networks: the case of the Swedish cashcard”, Information and Organization, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 187-206.
19. Johnson, J. (1995), “Chaos: the dollar drain of IT project failures”, Application Development Trends, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 41-7.
20. Keil, M. (1995a), “Pulling the plug: software project management and the problem of project escalation”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 421-47.
21. Keil, M. (1995b), “Escalation of commitment in information systems development: a comparison of three theories”, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, pp. 348-52.
22. Keil, M. and Montealegre, R. (2000), “Cutting your losses: how executives can extricate their organizations when big projects go awry”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 55-68.
23. Keil, M. and Robey, D. (1999), “Turning around troubled software projects: an exploratory study of the de-escalation of commitment to a failing course of action”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 63-87.
24. Keil, M. and Robey, D. (2001), “Blowing the whistle on troubled software projects”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 87-93.
25. Keil, M., Mann, J. and Rai, A. (2000), “Why software projects escalate: an empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 631-64.
26. Keil, M., Mixon, R., Saarinen, T. and Tuunainen, V. (1995), “Understanding runaway information technology projects: results from an international research program based on escalation theory”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 65-85.
27. Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1999), “A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 67-94.
28. KPMG (1995), “Runaway projects – causes and effects”, Software World, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 3-5.
29. Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Latour, B. (1991), “Technology is society made durable”, in Ed. Law, J. (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 196-233.
31. Latour, B. (1992), “Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts”, in Ed. Bijker, W.E. and Ed. Law, J. (Eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Latour, B. (1996), Aramis or the Love of Technology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
33. Latour, B. (1999), Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Law, J. (Ed.) (1991), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.
35. Law, J. (1994), Organizing Modernity, Blackwell, Oxford.
36. Law, J. and Hassard, J. (Eds) (1999), Actor Network Theory and after, Blackwell, Oxford.
37. Lee, A.S. (1989), “A scientific methodology for MIS case studies”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 33-50.
38. Lee, A.S. (1991), “Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research”, Organization Science, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 342-65.
39. Lee, A.S. (1994), “Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: an empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 143-57.
40. Lyytinen, K. and Hirschheim, R. (1987), “Information systems failures – a survey and classification of current literature”, in Ed. Zorkoczy, P.I. (Ed.), Oxford Surveys in Information Technology, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 257-309.
41. Markus, M.L. (1983), “Power, politics and MIS implementation”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 430-44.
42. Markus, M.L. (1991), “Is information richness theory rich enough? Or how managers using e-mail cope with lack of richness”, working paper, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
43. Montealegre, R. and Keil, M. (2000), “De-escalating information technology projects: lessons from the Denver International Airport”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 417-47.
44. Montealegre, R., Nelson, H.J., Knoop, C.I. and Applegate, L.M. (1996a), “BAE automated systems (A): Denver International Airport baggage-handling system”, Harvard Business School Teaching Case, No. 9-396-311, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA.
45. Montealegre, R., Nelson, H.J., Knoop, C.I. and Applegate, L.M. (1996b), “BAE automated systems (B): implementing the Denver International Airport baggage-handling system”, Harvard Business School Teaching Case, No. 9-396-312, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA.
46. Monteiro, E. and Hepsø, V. (2000), “Infrastructure strategy formation: seize the day at Statoil”, in Ed. Ciborra, C.U. et al. (Eds), From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
47. Newman, M. and Sabherwal, R. (1996), “Determinants of commitment to information systems development: a longitudinal investigation”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 23-54.
48. O'Driscoll, P. (1994), “DeLong remains bullish on DIA”, Denver Post, May 12, p. A-16.
49. Pfeffer, J. (1981), Power in Organizations, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
50. Rorty, R. (1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
51. Ross, J. and Staw, B.M. (1986), “Expo 86: an escalation prototype”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 274-97.
52. Ross, J. and Staw, B.M. (1993), “Organizational escalation and exit: lessons from the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 701-32.
53. Scott, S.V. and Wagner, E.L. (2003), “Networks, negotiations and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration”, Information and Organization, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 285-313.
54. Staw, B.M. (1976), “Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action”, Organizational Behavior and Performance, Vol. 16, pp. 27-44.
55. Staw, B.M. (1997), “The escalation of commitment: an update and appraisal”, in Ed. Shapira, Z. (Ed.), Organizational Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 191-215.
56. Staw, B.M. and Ross, J. (1978), “Commitment to a policy decision: a multi-theoretical perspective”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 40-64.
57. Staw, B.M. and Ross, J. (1987), “Behavior in escalation situations: antecedents, prototypes and solutions”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, pp. 39-78.
58. Svaldi, A. (1994), “Each new airport delay reduces financing options for bonds”, Denver Business Journal, May 6, p. 5.
59. Walsham, G. (1993), Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Wiley, Chichester.
60. Walsham, G. (1997), “Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects”, in Ed. Lee, A.S., Ed. Liebenau, J. and Ed. DeGross, J.I. (Eds), Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Chapman & Hall, London.
61. Walsham, G. and Sahay, S. (1999), “GIS for district-level administration in India: problems and opportunities”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 39-66.
62. Whyte, G. (1986), “Escalating commitment to a course of action: a reinterpretation”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 311-21.
63. Yin, R.K. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.