Error rates for nanopore discrimination among cytosine, methylcytosine, and hydroxymethylcytosine along individual DNA strands

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 47, 2013, Pages 18910-18915

  Schreiber, Jacob ^a   Wescoe, Zachary L ^a   Abu Shumays, Robin ^a   Vivian, John T ^a   Baatar, Baldandorj ^a   Karplus, Kevin ^a   Akeson, Mark ^a  

^a University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

5 HYDROXYMETHYLCYTOSINE; 5 METHYLCYTOSINE; CYTOSINE; DINUCLEOTIDE; DNA POLYMERASE; PORIN A;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA STRAND; DNA TEMPLATE; ION CURRENT; MACHINE LEARNING; METHYLATION; MYCOBACTERIUM; MYCOBACTERIUM SMEGMATIS; NANOPORE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EPIGENETICS; MSPA;

5-METHYLCYTOSINE; CYTOSINE; DNA; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENOMICS; NANOPORES; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84888101866     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310615110     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Li E, Bestor TH, Jaenisch R (1992) Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 69(6-915-926.
2. Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E (1999) DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 99(3-247-257.
3. Robertson KD (2005) DNA methylation and human disease. Nat Rev Genet 6(8- 597-610.
4. Tahiliani M, et al. (2009) Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324(5929-930-935.
5. Ito S, et al. (2011) Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 333(6047-1300-1303.
6. Wu H, Zhang Y (2011) Mechanisms and functions of Tet protein-mediated 5-methylcytosine oxidation. Genes Dev 25(23-2436-2452.
7. Frommer M, et al. (1992) A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(5- 1827-1831.
8. Huang Y, et al. (2010) The behaviour of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in bisulfite sequencing. PLoS One 5(1-e8888.
9. Lister R, et al. (2009) Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 462(7271-315-322.
10. Yu M, et al. (2012) Base-resolution analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian genome. Cell 149(6-1368-1380.
11. Booth MJ, et al. (2012) Quantitative sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at single-base resolution. Science 336(6083-934-937.
12. Korlach J, Turner SW (2012) Going beyond five bases in DNA sequencing. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22(3-251-261.
13. Eid J, et al. (2009) Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 323(5910-133-138.
14. Flusberg BA, et al. (2010) Direct detection of DNA methylation during single-molecule, real-time sequencing. Nat Methods 7(6-461-465.
15. Deamer DW, Branton D (2002) Characterization of nucleic acids by nanopore analysis. Acc Chem Res 35(10-817-825.
16. Cherf GM, et al. (2012) Automated forward and reverse ratcheting of DNA in a nanopore at 5-Å precision. Nat Biotechnol 30(4-344-348.
17. Cockroft SL, Chu J, Amorin M, Ghadiri MR (2008) A single-molecule nanopore device detects DNA polymerase activity with single-nucleotide resolution. J Am Chem Soc 130(3-818-820.
18. Manrao EA, et al. (2012) Reading DNA at single-nucleotide resolution with a mutant MspA nanopore and phi29 DNA polymerase. Nat Biotechnol 30(4-349-353.
19. Wallace EV, et al. (2010) Identification of epigenetic DNA modifications with a protein nanopore. Chem Commun (Camb) 46(43-8195-8197.
20. Olasagasti F, et al. (2010) Replication of individual DNA molecules under electronic control using a protein nanopore. Nat Nanotechnol 5(11-798-806.
21. Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L (2006) Extremely randomized trees. Mach Learn 63(1- 3-42.
22. Butler TZ, Pavlenok M, Derrington IM, Niederweis M, Gundlach JH (2008) Singlemolecule DNA detection with an engineered MspA protein nanopore. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(52-20647-20652.
23. Raileanu L, Stoffel K (2004) Theoretical comparison between the Gini index and information gain criteria. Ann Math Artif Intell 41(1-77-93.
24. Pedregosa F, et al. (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825-2830.