Technological pedagogical content knowledge in action: A case study of a middle school digital documentary project

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 179-200

  Hofer, Mark ^a   Swan, Kathleen Owings ^b  

^a Dept of Economics and Thomas Jefferson Program in Public Policy at the College of William and Mary   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational technology; History; Moviemaking; Technology integration; TPCK

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008770601     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2008.10782528     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 13(4), 519-546.
2. Burn, A., Brindley, S., Durran, J., Kelsall, C., Sweetlove, J., & Tuohey, C. (2001). The rush of images: A research report into digital editing and the moving image. English in Education, 35(2), 34-47.
3. Byrom, E. (1998). Factors that affect the effective use of technology for teaching and learning: Lessons learned from the SEIR-TEC intensive site schools. From http://www.serve.org/seir-tec/publications/lessons.html
4. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal 38(4), 813-834.
5. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cam-bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Darke, P., Shanks, G. & Broadbent, M. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: Combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal, 8(4), 273-289.
7. Diem, R. (1997). Information technology and civic education. In P. H. Mar- torella (Ed.), Interactive Technologies and the Social Studies (pp.91-110). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
8. Fahlberd, T., Fahlberg-Stojanovska, L., & MacNeil, G. (2007). Whiteboard math movies. Teaching mathematics audits applications, 26(1), 17-22.
9. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
10. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
11. Hicks, D., Tlou, J., Lee, J., Parry, L., & Doolittle, P, (2002) Global connections: Using the Internet to support citizenship education. International fournal of Social Education, 27(1), 93-102.
12. Hofer, M., & Swan, K.O. (2006). Standards, firewalls and general classroom mayhem: Implementing student centered research projects in a social studies classroom. Social Studies Research and Practice, i(1). Retrieved September 14, 2006, from http://www.socstrp.org/issues/viewarticle.cfm?volID=1&IssueID=1&ArticleID=3
13. Hoffenberg, H., & Handler, M. (2001). Digital video goes to school. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(2), 10-15.
14. Kearney, M. D., & Schuck, S. R. (2004). Authentic learning through the use of digital video. Research, reform, realise the potential?’In W. Au, & B. White (Eds.), ACEC2004 (pp. 1-7). Adelaide, Australia: Australian Council for Computers in Education.
15. Kearney, M., & Schuck, S. (2005). Students in the directors seat: Teaching and learning with student-generated video. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of Ed-Media 2005 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 2864-2871). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
16. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2007). TPCK Reference Library. Retrieved December 10, 2007, from http://tpck.org/tpck/index.php?title=Reference:Library
17. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical knowledge. In The AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), The Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching and Teacher Educators (pp. 3-29). New York: Routledge.
18. Lee, J. K., & Clarke, W. G. (2004). Doing digital local history: The story of Asaph Perry. Social Education, 68(3), 203-207.
19. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
21. Michalski, P., Hodges, D., & Banister, S. (2005). Digital storytelling in the middle childhood special education classroom: A teacher’s story of adaptations. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 7(4). Retrieved February 18, 2008, from http://escholarship.bc.edu/education/tecplus/voll/iss4/3
22. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
23. Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning & Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.
24. New, J. (2006). Film school: The silver screen inspires young minds to think big. Edutopia, 1(9), 20-23.
25. Norum, K., Grabinger, R., & Duffield, J. (1999). Healing the universe is an inside job: Teachers’ views on integrating technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 187-203.
26. Pflaum, W. (2004). The Technology Fix. Alexandria, VA.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
27. Reid, M., Burn, A, & Parker, D. (2002). Evaluation report of the Becta digital video pilot project. Coventry, UK: Becta.
28. Ryan, S. (2002). Digital video: Using technology to improve learner motivation. Modern English Teacher, 11(2), 72-75.
29. Shafer, G. (2000). Prime time literature in the high school. The English fournal, 90(2), 93-96.
30. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
31. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
32. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
33. Swan, K., Hofer, M., & Gallicchio, L. (2006). Historical scene investigation (HSI): Engaging students in case based investigations using Web-based historical documents. Social Studies Research and Practice, 1(2). Retrieved September 14, 2006, from http://www.socstrp.org/issues/viewarticle.cfm?volID=l&Issue ID=2&ArticleID=2
34. Swan, K. O., & Hofer, M. (in press). Technology in the social studies. In L. Levstik, & C. Tyson, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Social Studies Teaching and Learning. Malwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishing.
35. Swan, K., & Hofer, M. (2006). Digital campaigning: Using the Bill of Rights to advance a political position in 2004. The Social Studies, 97(5), 208-214.
36. Swan, K. O., Hofer, M., & Levstik, L. (2007). And action! Students collaborate in the Digital Directors Guild. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 19(4), 17-20.
37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Yow, S., & Swan, K. (in press). If you build it, should I run? A teacher’s perspective on implementing a student-centered, digital technology project in his ninth-grade geography classroom. In L. Lee, & A. Friedman (Eds.), Research on Technology and Social Studies Education. Charlotte, NC; Information Age Publishing.
39. Zhao, Y. (2003). What teachers need to know about technology: Framing the question. In Y. Zhao (Ed.), What should teachers know about technology? Perspectives and practices (pp. 1-14). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
40. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.