Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 351-365

  Holmes, Kathryn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349121382     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1139     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visualisation in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 215-241.
2. Brenner, M., Mayer, R., Moseley, B., Brar, T., Duran, R., Smith Reed, B., et al. (1997). Learning by understanding: The role of multiple representations in learning algebra. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 663-689.
3. Crison, C., Lerman, S. & Winbourne, P. (2007). Mathematics and ICT: A framework for conceptualising secondary school mathematics teachers'classroom practices. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(1), 21-39.
4. Gillen, J., Staarman, J., Littleton, K., Mercer, N. & Twiner, A. (2007). A 'learning revolution'? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 243-256.
5. Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D. & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155-170.
6. Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D. & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sectors. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 5-20.
7. Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G. & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213-225.
8. Jewitt, C., Moss, G., & Cardini, A. (2007). Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teachers'design of texts for interactive whiteboards in the secondary school classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 303-317.
9. Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S. & Beauchamp, G. (2007). Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 61-73.
10. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. [verified 22 June 2009] http://punya.educ.msu.edu/publications/journal_articles/mishra-koehler-tcr2006.pdf
11. Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levaaic, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A. & Castle, F. (2007). The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard expansion (SWE) Project: London Challenge. School of Educational Foundations and Policy Studies, Institute of Education, University of London. [verified 23 June 2009] http://publications.dcsf.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/RR816%20Report.pdf
12. Murcia, K. (2008). Teaching science creatively: Engaging primary teacher education students with interactive whiteboard technology. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3(3), 45-52.
13. NSWDET (2008). Click: A technology guide for parents [viewed 14 May 2008, verified 23 June 2009] http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/media/downloads/schoolsweb/news/technology/click.pdf
14. Reedy, G. B. (2008). PowerPoint, interactive whiteboards, and the visual culture of technology in schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(2), 143-162.
15. Schuck, S. & Kearney, M. (2007). Exploring pedagogy with interactive whiteboards. [viewed 15 May 2008] http://www.ed-dev.uts.edu.au/teachered/research/iwbproject/home.html
16. Schuck, S. & Kearney, M. (2008). Classroom-based use of two educational technologies: A sociocultural perspective. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4). http://www.citejournal.org/vol8/iss4/currentpractice/article2.cfm
17. Sedig, K. & Liang, H. (2006). Interactivity of visual mathematical representations: Factors affecting learning and the cognitive process. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 179-212.
18. Sedig, K. & Sumner, M. (2006). Characterizing interaction with visual mathematical representations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(1).
19. Shenton, A. & Pagett, L. (2007). From 'bored'to screen: The use of the interactive whiteboard for literacy in six primary classrooms. Literacy, 41(3), 129-136.
20. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
21. Smith, F., Hardman, F. & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457.
22. Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K. & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91-101.
23. Tanner, H. & Jones, S. (2007). Using video-stimulated reflective dialogue to learn from children about their learning with and without ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(3), 321-335.
24. Zevenbergen, R. & Lerman, S. (2007). Pedagogy and interactive whiteboards: Using an activity theory approach to understand tensions in practice. Proceedings 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematical Research Group of Australasia. http://www.merga.net.au/documents/RP812007.pdf