The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 134-142

  Bhagat, Kaushal Kumar ^a   Chang, Cheng Nan ^a   Chang, Chun Yen ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Achievement levels; Flipped classroom; High school students; Mathematics; Motivation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85000733446     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
2. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
3. Barrett, P. (2001). Assessing the reliability of rating data. Retrieved from http://www.pbarrett.net/presentations/rater.pdf
4. Bergmann, J., Overmyer, J., & Wilie, B. (2013, July 9). The Flipped class: Myths versus reality [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.thedailyriff.com/articles/the-flipped-class-conversation-689.php
5. Bidwell, A. (2014, August). Flipped classroom may help weaker STEM students, US News. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/news/stem-solutions/articles/2014/08/05/taking-a-page-from-humanities-college-engineering-gets-flipped
6. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
7. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers and Education, 79, 16-27. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 563-580. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
10. Fautch, J. M. (2015). The Flipped classroom for teaching organic chemistry in small classes: Is it effective? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 179-186. doi:10.1039/c4rp00230j
11. Hughes, H. (2012). Introduction to flipping the college classroom. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 2434-2438). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/41097
12. Hung, H.-T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81-96. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.967701
13. Keller, J. (2010). Tools to support motivational design. In Motivational Design for Learning and Performance (pp. 267-295). doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3_11
14. Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An Experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers and Education, 78, 160-173. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009
15. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
16. Lazakidou, G., & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(1), 3-13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.020
17. Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430-435. doi:10.1109/TE.2013.2249066
18. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19. Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597-599. doi:10.3928/01484834-20130919-03
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2006). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/standards/
21. Offer, J., & Bos, B. (2009). The Design and application of technology-based courses in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1133-1137. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.020
22. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A Dual coding approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. doi:10.1002/nur.20199
24. Rajghatta, C. (2014, August). Math teaching in India is robotic, make it creative: Manjul Bhargava. In The Times of India. Retrieved from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/sunday-times/deep-focus/Math-teaching-in-India-is-robotic-make-it-creative-Manjul-Bhargava/articleshow/40321279.cms
25. Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmuseen, S. C., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1334-1339. doi:10.1021/ed400868x
26. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193.
27. Tan, C.-K., & Tan, C.-P. (2015). Effects of the handheld technology instructional approach on performances of students of different achievement levels. Computers & Education, 82, 306-314. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.011
28. Wilkins, J. L. M., & Ma, X. (2003). Modeling change in student attitude toward and beliefs about mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 52-63. doi:10.1080/00220670309596628
29. Wilson, S. G. (2013). The Flipped class: A Method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 193-199. doi:10.1177/0098628313487461
30. Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24(4), 345-376.