Efficient targeted mutagenesis of rice and tobacco genomes using Cpf1 from Francisella novicida

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Endo, Akira ^a   Masafumi, Mikami ^a,b   Kaya, Hidetaka ^a   Toki, Seiichi ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGROBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; ENDONUCLEASE;

CHEMISTRY; ENZYMOLOGY; FRANCISELLA; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTAGENESIS; ORYZA; PLANT GENOME; TOBACCO;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; ENDONUCLEASES; FRANCISELLA; GENOME, PLANT; MUTAGENESIS; ORYZA; TOBACCO;

EID: 85000542327     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep38169     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Lee, J., Chung, J.-H., Kim, H. M., Kim, D.-W. & Kim, H. Designed nucleases for targeted genome editing. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 448-462 (2016).
2. Osakabe, Y. & Osakabe, K. Genome editing with engineered nucleases in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 56, 389-400 (2015).
3. Voytas, D. F. Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 327-350 (2013).
4. Khatodia, S., Bhatotia, K., Passricha, N., Khurana, S. M. P. & Tuteja, N. The CRISPR/Cas Genome-Editing Tool: Application in Improvement of Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 506 (2016).
5. Kumar, V. & Jain, M. The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing: advances and opportunities. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 47-57 (2015).
6. Ran, F. A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186-191 (2015).
7. Fonfara, I. et al. Phylogeny of Cas9 determines functional exchangeability of dual-RNA and Cas9 among orthologous type II CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 2577-2590 (2014).
8. Makarova, K. S. et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 722-736 (2015).
9. Jinek, M. et al. A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity. Science (80-.). 337, 816-821 (2012).
10. Hou, Z. et al. Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 15644-15649 (2013).
11. Steinert, J., Schiml, S., Fauser, F. & Puchta, H. Highly efficient heritable plant genome engineering using Cas9 orthologues from Streptococcus thermophilus and Staphylococcus aureus. Plant J. 84, 1295-1305 (2015).
12. Kaya, H., Mikami, M., Endo, A., Endo, M. & Toki, S. Highly specific targeted mutagenesis in plants using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Sci. Rep. 6, 26871 (2016).
13. Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 163, 759-771 (2015).
14. Budman, J. & Chu, G. Processing of DNA for nonhomologous end-joining by cell-free extract. EMBO J. 24, 849-860 (2005).
15. Altpeter, F. et al. Advancing Crop Transformation in the Era of Genome Editing. Plant Cell 28, 1510-1520 (2016).
16. Schaeffer, S. M. & Nakata, P. A. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and gene replacement in plants: Transitioning from lab to field. Plant Sci. 240, 130-142 (2015).
17. Mikami, M., Toki, S. & Endo, M. Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 expression constructs for efficient targeted mutagenesis in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 88, 561-572 (2015).
18. Kawalleck, P., Somssich, I. E., Feldbrugge, M., Hahlbrock, K. & Weisshaar, B. Polyubiquitin gene expression and structural properties of the ubi4-2 gene in Petroselinum crispum. Plant Mol. Biol. 21, 673-684 (1993).
19. Fauser, F., Schiml, S. & Puchta, H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 79, 348-359 (2014).
20. Toki, S. et al. Expression of a Maize Ubiquitin Gene Promoter-bar Chimeric Gene in Transgenic Rice Plants. Plant Physiol. 100, 1503-1507 (1992).
21. Norris, S. R., Barrette, T. R. & Della Penna, D. Genetic dissection of carotenoid synthesis in arabidopsis defines plastoquinone as an essential component of phytoene desaturation. Plant Cell 7, 2139-2149 (1995).
22. McHale, N. A. & Marcotrigiano, M. LAM1 is required for dorsoventrality and lateral growth of the leaf blade in Nicotiana. Development 125, 4235-4243 (1998).
23. Tadege, M. et al. STENOFOLIA regulates blade outgrowth and leaf vascular patterning in Medicago truncatula and Nicotiana sylvestris. Plant Cell 23, 2125-2142 (2011).
24. Nagasawa, N. et al. SUPERWOMAN1 and DROOPING LEAF genes control floral organ identity in rice. Development 130, 705-718 (2003).
25. Yamaguchi, T. et al. The YABBY gene DROOPING LEAF regulates carpel specification and midrib development in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell 16, 500-509 (2004).
26. McCourt, J. A. & Duggleby, R. G. Acetohydroxyacid synthase and its role in the biosynthetic pathway for branched-chain amino acids. Amino Acids 31, 173-210 (2006).
27. Tan, S., Evans, R. R., Dahmer, M. L., Singh, B. K. & Shaner, D. L. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops: history, current status and future. Pest Manag. Sci. 61, 246-257 (2005).
28. Tan, B. C. et al. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis 9-cis epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene family. Plant J 35, 44-56 (2003).
29. Hirano, K. et al. Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of phytohormone biosynthesis and signaling genes in microspore/pollen and tapetum of rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 49, 1429-1450 (2008).
30. Toki, S. et al. Early infection of scutellum tissue with Agrobacterium allows high-speed transformation of rice. Plant J. 47, 969-976 (2006).
31. Mikami, M., Toki, S. & Endo, M. Parameters affecting frequency of CRISPR/Cas9 mediated targeted mutagenesis in rice. Plant Cell Rep. 34, 1807-1815 (2015).
32. Endo, M., Mikami, M. & Toki, S. Multigene knockout utilizing off-target mutations of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 56, 41-47 (2015).
33. Nishizawa-Yokoi, A. et al. A Defect in DNA Ligase4 Enhances the Frequency of TALEN-Mediated Targeted Mutagenesis in Rice. Plant Physiol. 170, 653-666 (2016).
34. Mao, Y. et al. Development of germ-line-specific CRISPR-Cas9 systems to improve the production of heritable gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 519-532 (2016).
35. Hyun, Y. et al. Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using dividing tissue-targeted RGEN of the CRISPR/Cas system to generate heritable null alleles. Planta 241, 271-284 (2015).
36. Osakabe, K., Osakabe, Y. & Toki, S. Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis using custom-designed zinc finger nucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 12034-12039 (2010).
37. Mikami, M., Toki, S. & Endo, M. Precision Targeted Mutagenesis via Cas9 Paired Nickases in Rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 57, 1058-1068 (2016).
38. Kim, Y., Kweon, J. & Kim, J.-S. TALENs and ZFNs are associated with different mutation signatures. Nature methods 10, 185 (2013).
39. Lieber, M. R. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 181-211 (2010).
40. Budman, J., Kim, S. A. & Chu, G. Processing of DNA for nonhomologous end-joining is controlled by kinase activity and XRCC4/ligase IV. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 11950-11959 (2007).
41. Chen, X. et al. Probing the impact of chromatin conformation on genome editing tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 6482-6492 (2016).
42. Hilton, I. B. et al. Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 510-517 (2015).
43. Hendel, A. et al. Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 985-989 (2015).
44. Doench, J. G. et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1262-1267 (2014).
45. Fonfara, I., Richter, H., Bratovic, M., Le Rhun, A. & Charpentier, E. The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA. Nature 532, 517-521 (2016).
46. Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 869-74 (2016).
47. Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523, 481-485 (2015).
48. Hirano, S., Nishimasu, H., Ishitani, R. & Nureki, O. Structural Basis for the Altered PAM Specificities of Engineered CRISPR-Cas9. Mol. Cell 61, 886-894 (2016).
49. Anders, C., Bargsten, K. & Jinek, M. Structural Plasticity of PAM Recognition by Engineered Variants of the RNA-Guided Endonuclease Cas9. Mol. Cell 61, 895-902 (2016).
50. Slaymaker, I. M. et al. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science 351, 84-88 (2016).
51. Kim, D. et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 863-868 (2016).
52. Kim, Y. et al. Generation of knockout mice by Cpf1-mediated gene targeting. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 808-810 (2016).
53. Hajdukiewicz, P., Svab, Z. & Maliga, P. The small, versatile pPZP family of Agrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 25, 989-994 (1994).