Effects of a peer assessment system based on a grid-based knowledge classification approach on computer skills training

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 100-111

  Hsu, Ting Chia ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Grid based knowledge classification; Knowledge engineering; Peer assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85000501131     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abdul-Gader, A. H., & Kozar, K. A. (1990). Discourse analysis for knowledge acquisition: The Coherence method. Journal of Management Information Systems, 61-82.
2. Alexander, P., Van Loggerenberg, J., Lotriet, H., & Phahlamohlaka, J. (2010). The Use of the repertory grid for collaboration and reflection in a research context. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19(5), 479-504.
3. Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). Enhancing higher order thinking skills among inservice science teachers via embedded assessment. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(5), 459-474.
4. Barak, M., & Rafaeli, S. (2004). On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(1), 84-103.
5. Bloom, B., Englehart, M. F. E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The Classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans Green.
6. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (Eds.). (2014). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. New York, NY: Routledge.
7. Burleson, W. (2005). Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63, 436-451.
8. Chang, C. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). Using a web-based portfolio assessment system to elevate project-based learning performances. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(3), 211-230.
9. Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., & Lou, S. J. (2012). A Comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers & Education, 58(1), 303-320.
10. Chen, C. H. (2010). The Implementation and evaluation of a mobile self-and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 55, 229-236.
11. Chinn, D. (2005). Peer assessment in the algorithms course. ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) Bulletin, 37(3), 69-73.
12. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tseng, Judy C. R. (2010). An Innovative approach for developing and employing electronic libraries to support context-aware ubiquitous learning. The Electronic Library, 28(6), 873-890.
13. De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2012). How effective are self-and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers' assessments? Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), 129-142.
14. Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment. Programmed Learning, 32(2), 175-187.
15. Fallman, D., & Waterworth, J. (2010). Capturing user experiences of mobile information technology with the repertory grid technique. Human Technology, 6(2), 250-268.
16. Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom's taxonomy. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology (pp. 41-47).
17. Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2004). A Manual for repertory grid technique. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Gijbels, D., van de Watering, G., & Dochy, F. (2005). Integrating assessment tasks in a problem-based learning environment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 73-86.
19. Hersam, M. C., Luna, M. & Light, G. (2004). Implementation of interdisciplinary group learning and peer assessment in a nanotechnology engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 49-57.
20. Hsia, L. H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). A Web-based peer-assessment approach to improving junior high school students' performance, self-efficacy and motivation in performing arts courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 618-632. doi:10.1111/bjet.12248
21. Hsu, C. K., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. K. (2010). Development of a reading material recommendation system based on a knowledge engineering approach. Computers & Education, 55(1), 76-83.
22. Hsu, C. K., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. K. (2013). A Personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327-336.
23. Hoffman, R. R., Shadbolt, N. R., Burton, A. M., & Klein, G. (1995). Eliciting knowledge from experts: A Methodological analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 62(2), 129-158.
24. Hung, D. W., & Chen, D. T. (2001). Situated cognition, Vygotskian thought and learning from the communities of practice perspective: Implications for the design of web-based e-learning. Educational Media International, 38(1), 3-12.
25. Hwang, G. J., Hung, P. H., Chen, N. S., & Liu, G. Z. (2014). Mindtool-Assisted In-Field Learning (MAIL): An Advanced ubiquitous learning project in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 4-16.
26. Jonassen, D. H. & Carr, C. S. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools. No morewalls (Vol. 2, pp. 165-196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawlence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students' perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387-406.
28. Keynan, A., Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Goldman, D. (2014). The Repertory grid as a tool for evaluating the development of students' ecological system thinking abilities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 90-105.
29. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of personal construct. New York, NY: Norton.
30. Kumar, S., & Natarajan, B. R. (2010). Facilitating knowledge acquisition methodologies for a knowledge-based decision support system. Artificial Intelligent Systems and Machine Learning, 2(2), 27-32.
31. Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). An Interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices. Computers & Education, 85, 149-159.
32. Lawrence, J., & Zollinger, S. W. (2015). Assessment matters: Enriching design education through online peer critique. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(2), 78-86.
33. Lee, T. H., Shen, P. D., & Tsai, C. W. (2010). Enhance low-achieving students' learning involvement in Taiwan's higher education: an approach via e-learning with problem based learning and self-regulated learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 553-565.
34. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432.
35. Liu, C. C., & Lee, J. H. (2005). Prompting conceptual understanding with computer-mediated peer discourse and knowledge acquisition techniques. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 821-837.
36. Liu, C. C., & Tsai, C. M. (2005). Peer assessment through web-based knowledge acquisition: tools to support conceptual awareness. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(1), 43-59.
37. Lorente-Catalán, E., & Kirk, D. (2016). Student teachers' understanding and application of assessment for learning during a physical education teacher education course. European Physical Education Review, 22(1), 65-81.
38. Malmström, M., Johansson, J., & Wincent, J. (2015). Cognitive constructions of low-profit and high-profit business models: A Repertory grid study of serial entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1083-1109.
39. Ohland, M. W., Layton, R. A., Loughry, M. L., & Yuhasz, A. G. (2005). Effects of behavioral anchors on peer evaluation reliability. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(3), 319-326.
40. Race, P. (2001). A Briefing on self, peer & group assessment (Vol. 9). York, UK: Learning and Teaching Support Network.
41. Reid, J. (2000). A Task-oriented non-interactive evaluation methodology for information retrieval systems. Information Retrieval, 2(1), 115-129.
42. San, G., Huang, T. C., & Huang, L. H. (2006). The Establishment and application of a labor quality index: The Case of Taiwan's manufacturing industry. Social Indicators Research, 79(1), 61-96.
43. Siau, K., Tan, X., & Sheng, H. (2010). Important characteristics of software development team members: An Empirical investigation using repertory grid. Information Systems Journal, 20(6), 563-580.
44. Sluijsmans, D., Moerkerke, G., van-Merrienboer, J., & Dochy, F., (2001). Peer assessment in problem based learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 153-173.
45. Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 265-269.
46. Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., Chiou, S. K., & Hou, H. T. (2005). The Design and application of a web-based self-and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 45(2), 187-202.
47. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
48. Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 241-252.
49. Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A Study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.
50. Valtonen, T., Hacklin, S., Dillon, P., Vesisenaho, M., Kukkonen, J., & Hietanen, A. (2012). Perspectives on personal learning environments held by vocational students. Computers & Education, 58(2), 732-739.
51. Van den Berg, G. (2004). The Use of assessment in the development of higher-order thinking skills. Africa Education Review, 1(2), 279-294. doi:10.1080/18146620408566285
52. Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270-279.
53. Yang, Y. T. C. (2015). Virtual CEOs: A Blended approach to digital gaming for enhancing higher order thinking and academic achievement among vocational high school students. Computers & Education, 81, 281-295.
54. Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A Web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42, 337-348.
55. Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J., (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low achieving students: are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-182.