On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 84-103

  Barak, Miri ^a   Rafaeli, Sheizaf ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER NETWORKS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; ONLINE CONFERENCING; WEB BROWSERS;

COMPUTERIZED ADMINISTRATION; QUESTION-POSING ASSIGNMENT (QPA); SELF-ASSESSMENT; WEB-BASED KNOWLEDGE;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 3042575471     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ashmore A.D., Frazer M.J., Casey R.J. Problem solving and problem solving networks in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. 56:1979;377-379.
2. Barak, M., 2003. Exploiting an online testing system to go beyond the administration of tests. AACE E-Learn Conference, Phoenix Arizona November 2003, pp. 1487-1490.
3. Beichner, R., Wilkinson, J., Gastineau, L., Engelhardt, P., Gjertsen, M., Hazen, M., Ritchie, L., Risley, J., 2000. Education research using Web-based assessment systems. Available: http://www.physics.ncsu.edu/people/faculty.html (2002, July).
4. Birenbaum M., Dochy F. Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge. 1996;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
5. Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.B., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R., 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook 1: The Cognitive Domain. Longmans Green, New York.
6. Bohlin K.E. Schooling of desire. Journal of Education. 182(2):2000;69-79.
7. Bruner J.S. Acts of Meaning. 1990;Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
8. Carroll J.M., Neale D.C., Isenhour P.L., Rosson M.B., McCrickard D.S. Notification and awareness. synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 58:2003;605-632.
9. Conway R., Kember D., Sivan A., Wu M. Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 18:1993;45-56.
10. Dabbagh N. Multiple assessment in an online graduate course. an effectiveness evaluation Mann B.L. Perspectives in Web Course Management. 2000;179-197 Canadian Scholars' Press Inc, Toronto.
11. Dillon J.T. The Practice of Questioning. 1990;Routledge, London.
12. Dori Y.J., Barak M., Adir N. A web-based chemistry course as a means to foster freshmen learning. Journal of Chemical Education. 80(9):2003;1084-1092.
13. Dori Y.J., Herscovitz O. Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method. analysis of an environmental case study Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 36:1999;411-430.
14. Hamilton L.S., Klein S.P., Lorie W. Using Web-Based Testing for Large-Scale Assessment. 2000;Rand Education, Santa Monica.
15. Johnson T.R. The GMAT registrant survey: a retrospective Selections. 16:2000;20-25.
16. Larisey M.M. Student self assessment. a tool for learning Adult Learning. 5(6):1994;9-10.
17. Marbach-Ad G., Sokolove P.G. Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37:2000;854-870.
18. McDonald A.S. The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments. Computers & Education. 39:2002;299-312.
19. Potelle H., Rouet J.F. Effect of content representation and readers' prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 58:2003;327-345.
20. Rafaeli, S., Barak, M., Dan-Gur, Y., Toch, E., 2003. QSIA - A Web-based environment for learning, assessing and knowledge sharing in communities. Computers & Education, in press. Available online: http://www.sciencedirect. com/.
21. Rafaeli, S., Ravid, G., 1997. Online, Web-based learning environment for an information system course: Access Logs, Linearity and Performance. ISECON '97, Orlando, Florida, pp. 92-99.
22. Rafaeli S., Ravid G. Information sharing as enabler for the virtual team. an experimental approach to assessing the role of electronic mail in disintermediation Information Systems Journal. 13:2003;191-206.
23. Rafaeli S., Tractinsky N. Computerized tests and time. measuring, limiting and providing visual cues for time in computerized tests Behavior and Information Technology. 8:1989;335-353.
24. Rafaeli S., Tractinsky N. Time in computerized tests. a multi-trait multi-method investigation of general knowledge and mathematical reasoning in online examinations Computers in Human Behavior. 7:1991;123-142.
25. Robertson S., Reese K. A virtual library for building community and sharing knowledge. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 51:1999;663-685.
26. Shepardson D.P., Pizzini E.L. Questioning levels of junior high school science textbooks and their implications for learning textual information. Science Education. 75:1991;673-682.
27. Shodell M. The question-driven classroom. student questions as course curriculum on biology The American Biology Teacher. 57:1995;278-281.
28. Sluijsmans D., Moerkerke G., van-Merrienboer J., Dochy F. Peer assessment in problem based learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 27:2001;153-173.
29. Tamir P. Science assessing. Birenbaum M., Dochy F. Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge. 1996;93-129 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
30. Tang J.C. Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 34:1991;143-160.
31. Williams E. Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 17:1992;45-58.
32. Zevenbergen R. Peer assessment of student constructed projects. assessment alternatives in pre-service mathematics education Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 4:2001;95-113.
33. Zohar A., Dori Y.J. Higher order thinking skills and low achieving students. are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12(2):2002;145-182.