Pre-service biology teachers' acceptance of evolutionary theory and their preference for its teaching

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Großschedl, Jörg ^a   Konnemann, Christiane ^b   Basel, Nicolai ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acceptance of evolutionary theory; Pre service biology teachers; Predictors; Preference for teaching evolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992640856     PISSN: 19366426     EISSN: 19366434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12052-014-0018-z     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Aguillard D: Evolution education in Louisiana public schools: a decade following Edwards v Aguillard. The American Biology Teacher 1999, 61: 182-188. 10.2307/4450650
2. Akaike H: Likelihood of a model and information criteria. Journal of Econometrics 1981, 16: 3-14. 10.1016/0304-4076(81)90071-3
3. Akyol G, Tekkaya C, Sungur S: The contribution of understandings of evolutionary theory and nature of science to pre-service science teachers' acceptance of evolutionary theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2010, 9: 1889-1893. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.419
4. Akyol G, Tekkaya C, Sungur S, Traynor A: Modeling the interrelationships among pre-service science teachers' understanding and acceptance of evolution, their views on nature of science and self-efficacy beliefs regarding teaching evolution. Journal of Science Teacher Education 2012, 23: 937-957. 10.1007/s10972-012-9296-x
5. Allmon W: Why don't people think evolution is true? Implications for teaching, in and out of the classroom. Evolution: Education and Outreach 2011, 4: 648-665. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00188.x
6. Anderson DL, Fisher KM, Norman GJ: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2002, 39: 952-978. 10.1002/tea.10053
7. Asghar A, Wiles JR, Alters B: Canadian pre-service elementary teachers' conceptions of biological evolution and evolution education. McGill Journal of Education 2007, 42: 189-210.
8. Astley J, Francis LJ: Promoting positive attitudes towards science and religion among sixth-form pupils: dealing with scientism and creationism. British Journal of Religious Education 2010, 32: 189-200. 10.1080/01416200.2010.498604
9. Athanasiou K, Papadopoulou P: Conceptual ecology of the evolution acceptance among Greek education students: Knowledge, religious practices and social influences. International Journal of Science Education 2012, 34: 903-924. 10.1080/09500693.2011.586072
10. Athanasiou K, Katakos E, Papadopoulou P: Conceptual ecology of evolution acceptance among Greek education students: the contribution of knowledge increase. Journal of Biological Education 2012, 46: 234-241. 10.1080/00219266.2012.716780
11. Balgopal MM: Learning and intending to teach evolution: concerns of pre-service biology teachers. Research in Science Education 2014, 44: 27-52. 10.1007/s11165-013-9371-0
12. Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51: 1173-1182. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
13. Basel, N, Harms, U, Prechtl, H, Weiß, T, & Rothgangel, M. (2014). Students' arguments on the science and religion issue: The example of evolutionary theory and Genesis. Journal of Biological Education. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.849286.
14. Battisti TB, Hanegan N, Sudweeks R, Cates R: Using item response theory to conduct a distracter analysis on conceptual inventory of natural selection. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2010, 8: 845-868. 10.1007/s10763-009-9189-4
15. Bentler PM: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 107: 238-246. 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
16. Berkman MB, Plutzer E: Defeating creationism in the courtroom, but not in the classroom. Science 2011, 331(6016):404-405. 10.1126/science.1198902
17. Bond TG, Fox CM: Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ; 2001.
18. Bönisch J: Pädagogischer Sündenfall [Pedagogical fall of mankind]. 2010. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/karriere/kreationismus-imschulunterricht-paedagogischer-suendenfall-1.477324. Accessed 20 Oct 2013.
19. BouJaoude S, Asghar A, Wiles JR, Jaber L, Sarieddine D, Alters B: Biology professors' and teachers' positions regarding biological evolution and evolution education in a Middle Eastern society. International Journal of Science Education 2011, 33: 979-1000. 10.1080/09500693.2010.489124
20. Cavallo AML, McCall D: Seeing may not mean believing: examining students' understandings & beliefs in evolution. American Biology Teacher 2008, 70: 522-530. 10.1662/0002-7685-70.9.522
21. Cohen J, Cohen P: Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ; 2003.
22. Curry A: Creationist beliefs persist in Europe. Science 2009, 323(5918):1159-1159. 10.1126/science.323.5918.1159
23. Demastes SS, Good RG, Peebles P: Students conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education 1995, 79: 637-666. 10.1002/sce.3730790605
24. Deniz H, Donnelly LA, Yilmaz I: Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2008, 45: 420-443. 10.1002/tea.20223
25. Evans EM: Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 42: 217-266. 10.1006/cogp.2001.0749
26. Goldston MJD, Kyzer P: Teaching evolution: narratives with a view from three Southern biology teachers in the USA. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2009, 46: 762-790. 10.1002/tea.20289
27. Graf D, Soran H: Einstellung und Wissen von Lehramtsstudierenden zur Evolution - ein Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und der Türkei [Pre-service teachers' attitude towards evolution and knowledge about evolution - a comparison between Germany and Turkey]. In Evolutionstheorie - Akzeptanz und Vermittlung im europäischen Vergleich. Edited by: Graf D. Springer, Heidelberg; 2011:141-161. 10.1007/978-3-642-02228-9
28. Griffith JA, Brem SK: Teaching evolutionary biology: pressures, stress, and coping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2004, 41: 791-809. 10.1002/tea.20027
29. Ha M, Haury DL, Nehm RH: Feeling of certainty: uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2012, 49: 95-121. 10.1002/tea.20449
30. Hermann R: High school biology teachers' views on teaching evolution: implications for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education 2013, 24(4):597-616. 10.1007/s10972-012-9328-6
31. Hill HC, Ball DL, Schilling SG: Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: conceptualizing and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2008, 39(4):372-400.
32. Kamann M: Debatte um Kreationismus in Bekenntnisschulen [A debate about creationism in denominational schools]. 2013. Die Welt. http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article115215588/Debatte-um-Kreationismus-an-Bekenntnisschulen.html. Accessed 20 Oct 2013.
33. Konnemann C, Asshoff R, Hammann M: Einstellungen zur Evolutionstheorie: Theoretische und messtheoretische Klärungen [Attitudes towards evolutionary theory: Theoretical and psychometric issues]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 2012, 18: 55-79.
34. Köse Ö: Biology students' and teachers' religious beliefs and attitudes towards theory of evolution. H. U. Journal of Education 2010, 38: 189-200.
35. Lederman N, Abd-El-Khalick F: Avoiding De-Natured Science: Activities that Promote Understandings of the Nature of Science. In The Nature of Science in Science Education. Edited by: McComas WF. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York; 1998:83-126.
36. Lee E, Luft JA: Experienced secondary science teachers' representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education 2008, 30(10):1343-1363. 10.1080/09500690802187058
37. Lerner LS, Goodenough U, Lynch J, Schwartz M, Schwartz R, Gross PR: The state of state science standards. 2012. http://www.edexcellencemedia.net/publications/2012/2012-State-of-State-Science-Standards/2012-State-of-State-Science-Standards-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 18 Dec 2013.
38. Lombrozo T, Thanukos A, Weisberg M: The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education & Outreach 2008, 1: 280-298.
39. Long DE: The politics of teaching evolution, science education standards, and being a creationist. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2012, 49(1):112-139. 10.1002/tea.20445
40. Losh SC, Nzekwe B: Creatures in the classroom: preservice teacher beliefs about fantastic beasts, magic, extraterrestrials, evolution and creationism. Science & Education 2011, 20: 473-489. 10.1007/s11191-010-9268-5
41. Loughran J, Milroy P, Berry A, Gunstone R, Mulhall P: Documenting science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education 2001, 31: 289-307. 10.1023/A:1013124409567
42. MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS: Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology 2007, 58: 593-614. 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
43. Mazur A: Believers and disbelievers in evolution. Politics and the Life Sciences 2004, 23: 55-61. 10.2990/1471-5457(2004)23[55:BADIE]2.0.CO;2
44. Mazur A: Do Americans believe modern earth science? Evolution: Education and Outreach 2010, 3: 629-632.
45. Mersch B: Kreationismus in Deutschland: Vor uns die Sintflut [Creationism in Germany: Before us the deluge]. 2006. Spiegel online. http://www.spiegel.de/schulspiegel/wissen/kreationismus-in-deutschland-vor-uns-die-sintflut-a-437733.html. Accessed 20 Oct 2013.
46. Miller JD, Scott EC, Okamoto S: Public acceptance of evolution. Science 2006, 313(5788):765-766. 10.1126/science.1126746
47. Moore R: The differing perceptions of teachers and students regarding teachers' emphasis on evolution in high school biology classrooms. American Biology Teacher 2007, 65: 268-272. 10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[268:TDPOTS]2.0.CO;2
48. Moore R, Cotner S: Educational malpractice: the impact of including creationism in high school biology courses. Evolution: Education and Outreach 2009, 2: 95-100.
49. Muthén LK, Muthén BO: Mplus user's Guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles; 2007.
50. Nadelson L, Nadelson S: K-8 educators perceptions and preparedness for teaching evolution topics. Journal of Science Teacher Education 2010, 21: 843-858. 10.1007/s10972-009-9171-6
51. Nadelson LS, Sinatra GM: Educational professionals' knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Evolutionary Psychology 2009, 7: 490-516.
52. Nadelson LS, Southerland S: A more fine-grained measure of students' acceptance of evolution: development of the inventory of student evolution acceptance - I-SEA. International Journal of Science Education 2012, 34: 1637-1666. 10.1080/09500693.2012.702235
53. Nehm RH, Ha M: Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2011, 48(3):237-256. 10.1002/tea.20400
54. Nehm RH, Schonfeld IS: Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education 2007, 18: 699-723. 10.1007/s10972-007-9062-7
55. Nehm RH, Schonfeld IS: Measuring knowledge of natural selection: a comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2008, 45(10):1131-1160. 10.1002/tea.20251
56. Nehm RH, Schonfeld IS: The future of natural selection knowledge measurement: a reply to Anderson et al. (2010) REPLY. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2010, 47(3):358-362.
57. Nehm RH, Kim SY, Sheppard K: Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: biology versus non-biology teachers. Science Education 2009, 93: 1122-1146. 10.1002/sce.20340
58. Nehm RH, Beggrow EP, Opfer JE, Ha M: Reasoning about natural selection: diagnosing contextual competency using the ACORNS instrument. The American Biology Teacher 2012, 74(2):92-98. 10.1525/abt.2012.74.2.6
59. Park S, Oliver JS: Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education 2008, 38(3):261-284. 10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
60. Pintrich PR, Marx RW, Boyle RA: Beyond cold conceptual change - the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research 1993, 63: 167-199. 10.3102/00346543063002167
61. Posner GJ, Strike KA, Hewson PW, Gertzog WA: Accommodation of a scientific conception: towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 1982, 66: 211-227. 10.1002/sce.3730660207
62. Rutledge ML, Sadler KC: Reliability of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution (MATE) instrument with university students. The American Biology Teacher 2007, 69: 332-335. 10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[332:ROTMOA]2.0.CO;2
63. Rutledge ML, Warden MA: Development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics 1999, 99: 13-18. 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17441.x
64. Sanders M, Ngxola N: Addressing teachers' concerns about teaching evolution. Journal of Biological Education 2009, 43: 121-128. 10.1080/00219266.2009.9656166
65. Schermelleh-Engel K, Mossbrugger H: Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online 2003, 8(2):23-74.
66. Schmelzing S, van Driel JH, Jüttner M, Brandenbusch S, Sandmann A, Neuhaus BJ: Development, evaluation, and validation of a paper-and-pencil test for measuring two components of biology teachers' pedagogical content knowledge concerning the "cardiovascular system". International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2013, 11(6):1369-1390. 10.1007/s10763-012-9384-6
67. Scott EC: Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction. University of California Press, Los Angeles; 2009.
68. Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany [KMK]. (2004a). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss [Educational standards for intermediate school-leaving qualification in Biology]. http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen-beschluesse/2004/2004-12-16-Bildungsstandards-Biologie.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2014.
69. Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany [KMK]. (2004b).Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften [Standards for teacher training in the educational sciences]. http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen-beschluesse/2004/2004-12-16-Standards-Lehrerbildung.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2014.
70. Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany [KMK]. (2008). Ländergemeinsame inhaltliche Anforderungen für die Fachwissenschaften und Fachdidaktiken in der Lehrerbildung [Content requirements for subject-related studies and subject-related didactics in teacher training which apply to all Länder]. http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen-beschluesse/2008/2008-10-16-Fachprofile-Lehrerbildung.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2014.
71. Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany [KMK]. (2013). The education system in the federal republic of Germany 2011/2012: A description of the responsibilities, structures and developments in education policy for the exchange of information in Europe. http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/doc/Dokumentation/Bildungswesen-en-pdfs/teachers.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2014.
72. Shanaham MC, Nieswandt M: Science student role: evidence of social structural norms specific to school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2011, 48(4):367-395. 10.1002/tea.20406
73. Shulman LS: Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 1986, 15(2):4-15. 10.3102/0013189X015002004
74. Sickel, AJ, & Friedrichsen, P. (2013). Examining the evolution education literature with a focus on teachers: major findings, goals for teacher preparation, and directions for future research. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 6(23).
75. Sinatra GM, Southerland SA, McConaughy F, Demastes JW: Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2003, 40: 510-528. 10.1002/tea.10087
76. Smith EV: Metric development and score reporting in Rasch measurement. Journal of Applied Measurement 2000, 1: 303-326.
77. Smith MU: Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: I. philosophical/epistemological issues. Science & Education 2010, 19: 523-538. 10.1007/s11191-009-9215-5
78. Smith MU, Scharmann LC: Defining versus describing the nature of science: a pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education 1999, 83(4):493-509. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199907)83:4<493::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-U
79. Toulmin S: Human Understanding. Princton University Press, Princeton; 1972.
80. Trani R: I won't teach evolution; it's against my religion. And now for the rest of the story.... The American Biology Teacher 2004, 66: 419-427. 10.1662/0002-7685(2004)066[0419:IWTIAM]2.0.CO;2
81. van Dijk EM: Teachers' views on understanding evolutionary theory: a PCK-study in the framework of the ERTE-model. Teaching and Teacher Education 2009, 25: 259-267. 10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.008
82. Wilson M, deBoek P, Carstensen CH: Explanatory Item Response Models: A Brief Introduction. In Assessment of Competencies in Educational Contexts. Edited by: Hartig J, Klieme E, Leutner D. Hogrefe, Cambridge, MA; 2008:91-120.
83. Wright, BD, & Linacre, JM. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
84. Wright BD, Mok M: Rasch models overview. Journal of Applied Measurement 2000, 1: 83-106.
85. Wu ML, Adams RJ, Wilson MR, Haldane SA: ACER ConQuest version 2.0: Generalised item response modelling software. ACER Press, Camberwell; 2007.