Reasoning about natural selection: Diagnosing contextual competency using the ACORNS instrument

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 92-98

  Nehm, Ross H ^a   Beggrow, Elizabeth P ^a   Opfer, John E ^a   Ha, Minsu ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contexts; Diagnostic assessment; Evolution; Learning; Natural selection; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856595289     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/abt.2012.74.2.6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. AERA (American Educational Research Association), APA (American Psychological Association), & NCME (National Council on Measurement in Education). (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, D.C.: AERA .
2. Anderson, D.L., Fisher, K.M. & Norman, G.J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 952-978.
3. Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C. & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to Research in Education, 6th Ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth-Thomson Learning.
4. Barnett, S.M. & Ceci, S.J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612-637.
5. Battisti, B.T., Hanegan, N., Sudweeks, R. & Cates, R. (2010). Using item response theory to conduct a distracter analysis on Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 845-868.
6. Bishop, B.A. & Anderson, C.W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-427.
7. Campbell, N.A. & Reece, J.B. (2008). Biology, 8th Ed. San Francisco, CA: Pearson Benjamin Cummings.
8. Endler, J.A. (1986). Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Furr, R.M. & Bacharach,V.R. (2008). Psychometrics: An Introduction. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
10. Gentner, D. & Colhoun, J. (2010). Analogical processes in human thinking and learning. In B. Glatzeder, V. Goel, & A. von Müller (Eds.), On Thinking, vol. 2: Towards a Theory of Thinking (pp. 35-48). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. GoogleLabs (2011). Books Ngram viewer. Accessed online 21 January 2011 at http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/.
12. Gould, S.J. (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
13. Gregory, T.R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution Education and Outreach, 2, 156-175.
14. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing What Students Know. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
15. Nehm, R.H. (2006). Faith-based evolution education? BioScience, 56, 638-639. (Pubitemid 44195402)
16. Nehm, R.H. & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 237-256.
17. Nehm, R.H., Ha, M. & Mayfield, E. (2012). Transforming biology assessment with machine learning: automated scoring of written evolutionary explanations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, in press.
18. Nehm, R.H., Ha, M., Rector, M., Opfer, J., Perrin, L., Ridgway, J. & Mollohan, K. (2010). Scoring guide for the open response instrument (ORI) and evolutionary gain and loss test (ACORN S). Technical Report of National Science Foundation REE SE Project 0909999. Accessed online 10 December 2010 at http://evolutionassessment.org/.
19. Nehm, R.H. & Haertig, H. (2012). Human vs. computer diagnosis of students' natural selection knowledge: testing the efficacy of text analytic software. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, in press.
20. Nehm, R.H. & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors' knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57, 263-272. (Pubitemid 351837761)
21. Nehm, R.H. & Schonfeld, I.S. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: a comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1131-1160.
22. Nehm, R.H. & Schonfeld, I.S. (2010). The future of natural selection knowledge measurement: a reply to Anderson et al. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 358-362.
23. Opfer, J.E. & Gelman, S.A. (2010). Development of the animate-inanimate distinction. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development, 2nd Ed. (pp. 213-238). Malden, MA : Blackwell.
24. Opfer, J.E. & Thompson, C.A. (2008). The trouble with transfer: insights from microgenetic changes in the representation of numerical magnitude. Child Development, 79, 790-806.