Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 420-443

  Deniz, Hasan ^a   Donnelly, Lisa A ^b   Yilmaz, Irfan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Biology; Epistemology; Evolution; Teacher beliefs

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; EPISTEMOLOGY; TEACHER BELIEFS;

CORRELATION THEORY; CURRICULA; ECOLOGY; MULTIVARIABLE SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

TEACHING;

EID: 42549155686     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20223     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V.L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science. Science Education, 88, 785-810.
2. Aguillard, D. (1999). Evolution education in Louisiana public schools: A decade following Edwards v. Aguillard. American Biology Teacher, 61, 182-188.
3. Aikenhead, G.J., & Jegede, O.J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269-287.
4. Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (1997). Sources from a Somerset village: A model for informal learning about radiation and radioactivity. Science Education, 81, 633-650.
5. Alters, B.J., & Nelson, C. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. International Journal of Organic Evolution, 56, 1891-1901.
6. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
8. Baxter-Magolda, M. (2002). Epistemological reflection: The evolution of epistemological assumptions from age 18 to 30. In B.K. Hofer & RR. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Behe, M. (1996). Darwin's black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
10. Bishop, B.A., & Anderson, C.W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 417-425.
11. Brem, S.K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87, 181-206.
12. Clough, M.P. (1994). Diminish students' resistance to biological evolution. American Biology Teacher, 56, 409-415.
13. Cobern, W.W. (1994). Point: Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 583-590.
14. Cobern, W.W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education, 80, 579-610.
15. Cooper, R. A. (2001). The goal of evolution instruction: Should we aim for belief or scientific literacy? Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 21, 14-18.
16. Costa, V.B. (1995). When science is "another world": Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79, 313-333.
17. Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
18. Dagher, Z.R., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 429-445.
19. Demastes, S.S., Good, R.G., & Peebles, P. (1995). Students' conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change. Science Education, 79, 637-666.
20. Demastes, S.S., Settlage, J. Jr., & Good, R.G. (1995). Students' conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 535-550.
21. Duit, R., & Treagust, D.F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671-688.
22. Epstein, S., & Meier, P. (1989). Constructive thinking: A broad coping variable with specific components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 332-350.
23. Eve, R.A., & Dunn, D. (1990). Psychic powers, astrology & creationism in the classroom? American Biology Teacher, 52, 10-20.
24. Hofer, B.K. (2002). Personal epistemology as a psychological and educational construct: An introduction. In B.K. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Hofer, B.K., & Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
26. Jehng, J.J. (1991). The nature of epistemological beliefs about learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
27. Johnson, R.L. (1985). The acceptance of evolutionary theory by biology majors in colleges of the west north central states. Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley.
28. Johnson, R.L., & Peeples, E.E. (1987). The role of scientific understanding in college: student acceptance of evolution. American Biology Teacher, 49, 93-96.
29. King, P.M., & Kitchener, K.S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsifications and the meeting of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lawson, A.E., & Thompson, L.D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 733-746.
33. Lawson, A.E., & Weser, J. (1990). The rejection of nonscientific beliefs about life: Effects of instruction and reasoning skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 589-606.
34. Lawson, A.E., & Worsnop, W.A. (1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 143-166.
35. Lederman, N.G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understanding of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83-126). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
36. Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Schwartz, R.S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39,497-521.
37. Lemke, J.L. (2001). Articulation communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296-316.
38. Matthews, D. (2001). Effect of a curriculum containing Creation stories on attitudes about evolution. American Biology Teacher, 63, 404-409.
39. McKeachie, W.J., Lin, Y., & Strayer, J. (2002). Creationist vs. evolutionary beliefs: Effects on learning biology. American Biology Teacher, 64, 189-197.
40. Meadows, L., Doster, E., & Jackson, D.F. (2000). Managing the conflict between evolution and religion. American Biology Teacher, 62, 102-107.
41. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
42. Ogawa, M. (1989). Beyond the tacit framework of 'science' and 'science education' among science educators. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 247-250.
43. Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 185-204.
44. Paulhus, D.L., & Reid, D.B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307-317.
45. Perry, W.G. (1970). Intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Pines, A.L., & West, L.H.T. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a sources-of-knowledge framework. Science Education, 70, 583-604.
47. Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., & Boyle, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change. The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.
48. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
49. Rutledge, M.L., & Warden, M.A. (1999). Development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 13-18.
50. Rutledge, M.L., & Warden, M.A. (2000). Science and high school biology teachers: Critical relationships. American Biology Teacher, 62, 23-31.
51. Rutledge, M.L., & Mitchell, M.A. (2002). High school biology teachers' knowledge structure, acceptance, and teaching of evolution. American Biology Teacher, 64, 21-27.
52. Robinson, J.P., Shaver, P.R., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (vol. 1, 560-564). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53. Sa W.C., West, R.F., & Stanovich, K.E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 497-510.
54. Sayin, U., & Kence, A. (1999). Islamic scientific creationism: A new challenge in Turkey. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 19, 18-20, 25-29.
55. Scott, E.C., & Branch, G. (2003). Evolution: What's wrong with 'teaching the controversy'. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 499-502.
56. Scharmann, L.C. (2005). A proactive strategy for teaching evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 67, 12-16.
57. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
58. Shankar, G., & Skoog, G. (1993). Emphasis given evolution and creationism by Texas high school biology teachers. Science Education, 77, 221-233.
59. Sinatra, G.M., & Pintrich, P.R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Sinatra, G.M., Southerland, S.A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J.W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510-528.
61. Sinclair, A., Pendarvis, M.P., & Baldwin, B. (1997). The relationship between college zoology students' beliefs about evolutionary theory and religion. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 118-125.
62. Smith, M.U. (1994). Counterpoint: Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 591-597.
63. Smith, M.U., & Scharmann, L.C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 83, 493-509.
64. Smith, M.U., Siegel, H., & McInerney, J.D. (1995). Foundational issues in evolution education. Science & Education, 4, 23-46.
65. Solomon, K. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils' understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14, 63-82.
66. Southerland, S.S., Johnston, A., & Sowell, S. (2006). Describing teachers' conceptual ecologies for the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 90, 874-906.
67. Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (2007). Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 225-247.
68. Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342-357.
69. Strike, K., & Posner, G.J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R.A. Duschl & R.J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). New York: State University of New York.
70. Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: An inquiry into the aims of science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71. Troldahl, V., & Powell, F. (1965). A short-form dogmatism scale for use in field studies. Social Forces, 44, 211-215.
72. Verhey, S.D. (2005). The effect of engaging prior learning on student attitudes toward creationism and evolution. Bioscience, 55, 996-1003.
73. West, L.H.T., & Pines, A.L. (1983). How "rational" is rationality? Science Education, 67, 291-299.
74. Wood, P.K., & Kardash, C. (2002). Critical elements in the design of critical thinking studies. In B.K. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Woods, C.S., & Scharmann, L.C. (2001). High school students' perceptions of evolutionary theory. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(2).
76. Wright, B.D., & Masters, G.N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press.