Modeling the Interrelationships Among Pre-service Science Teachers' Understanding and Acceptance of Evolution, Their Views on Nature of Science and Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding Teaching Evolution

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 937-957

  Akyol, Gülsüm ^a,b   Tekkaya, Ceren ^a   Sungur, Semra ^a   Traynor, Anne ^c  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b AKSARAY UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolution; Nature of science; Pre service science teachers; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870390104     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: 15731847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-012-9296-x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Aguillard, D. (1999). Evolution education in Louisiana public schools: A decade following Edwards v. Aguillard. American Biology Teacher, 61, 182-188.
2. Akyol, G., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2010). The contribution of understandings of evolutionary theory and nature of science to pre-service science teachers: Acceptance of evolutionary theory. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1889-1893.
3. Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. International Journal of Organic Evolution, 56, 1891-1901.
4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2006). Statement on the teaching of evolution. Retrieved from http://www. aaas. org/news/releases/2006/pdf/0219boardstatement. pdf.
5. Asghar, A., Wiles, J. R., & Alters, B. (2007). Canadian pre-service elementary teachers' conceptions of biological evolution and evolution education. Mcgill Journal of Education, 42(2), 189-209.
6. Athanasiou, K., & Papadopoulou, P. (2011). Conceptual ecology of the evolution acceptance among greek education students: knowledge, religious practices and social influences. International Journal of Science Education. doi: 10. 1080/09500693. 2011. 586072.
7. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
9. Banet, E., & Ayuso, G. E. (2003). Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 373-407.
10. Beardsley, P. M. (2004). Middle school student learning in evolution: Are current standards achievable? American Biology Teacher, 66(9), 604-612.
11. Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 417-425.
12. Bleicher, R. E. (2004). Revisiting the STEBI-B: Measuring self-efficacy in pre-service elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics Journal, 104, 383-391.
13. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
14. BouJaoude, S., Asghar, A., Wiles, J. R., Jaber, L., Sarieddine, D., & Alters, B. (2011). Biology professors' and teachers' positions regarding biological evolution and evolution education in a Middle Eastern society. International Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 979-1000. doi: 10(1080/09500693), 2010, 489124.
15. Clough, M. P. (1994). Diminish students' resistance to biological evolution. American Biology Teacher, 56, 409-415.
16. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Teresi, J., Marchi, M., & Valez, C. N. (1990). Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equations causal models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 183-196.
17. Dagher, Z. R., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 429-445.
18. Dagher, Z., & BouJaoude, S. (2005). Students' perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Science Education, 89, 378-391.
19. Deniz, H., Donelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 420-443.
20. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: a preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 694-706.
21. Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217-266.
22. Farber, P. (2003). Teaching evolution and the nature of science. The American Biology Teacher, 65(5), 347-354.
23. Finley, F. N., Stewart, J., & Yarroch, W. L. (1982). Teachers' perceptions of important and difficult science content. Science Education, 66(4), 531-538.
24. Graf, D., & Soran, H. (2011). Evolutionstheorie-Akzeptanz und Vermittlung im europäischen Vergleich. Einstellung und Wissen von Lehramtstudierenden zur Evolution-ein Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und der Türkei. In Graf, D. (Ed.), Tagungsband Einstellung und Wissen zu Evolution und Wissenschaft in Europa (pp. 141-161). Heidelberg: Springer.
25. Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 156-175. doi: 10. 1007/S12052-009-0128-1.
26. Griffith, J. A., & Brem, S. K. (2004). Teaching evolutionary biology: Pressures, stress, and coping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 791-809.
27. Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79, 147-166.
28. Johnson, R. L. (1985). The acceptance of evolutionary theory by biology majors in colleges of the west north central states (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Northern Colorado, Greeley.
29. Johnson, R. L., & Peeples, E. E. (1987). The role of scientific understanding in college: Student acceptance of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 49, 93-98.
30. Jones, E. (1986). Translation of quantitative measures for use in cross-cultural research. Nursing Research, 9, 324-327.
31. Kim, S. Y., & Nehm, R. H. (2011). A cross-cultural comparison of Korean and American science teachers' views of evolution and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 197-227. doi: 10. 1080/09500690903563819.
32. Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(3), 290-298.
33. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. McComas, W. F. (1998). The principle elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53-70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35. McDonald, R. M. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Meir, E., Perry, J., Herron, J. C., & Kingsolver, J. (2007). College students' misconceptions about evolutionary trees. American Biology Teacher, 69, 71-76.
37. Moore, R. (2007). The differing perceptions of teachers and students regarding teachers' emphasis on evolution in high school biology classrooms. The American Biology Teacher, 69(5), 268-271.
38. Moore, R., & Kraemer, K. (2005). The teaching of evolution and creationism in Minnesota. The American Biology Teacher, 67, 457-466.
39. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
40. Nadelson, L. S., & Nadelson, S. (2010). K-8 educators perceptions and preparedness for teaching evolution topics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 843-858. doi: 10. 1007/s10972-009-9171-6.
41. National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
42. National Association of Biology Teachers. (2008). NABT statement on teaching evolution. Retrieved from http://www. nabt. org/websites/institution/index. php?p=92.
43. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press.
44. National Science Teachers Association. (2003). NSTA position statement: The teaching of evolution. Retrieved from http://www. nsta. org/about/positions/evolution. aspx.
45. Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for teaching of evolution in schools. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 699-723.
46. Nickels, M. K., Nelson, C. E., & Beard, J. (1996). Better biology teaching by emphasizing evolution and the nature of science. The American Biology Teacher, 58(6), 332-336.
47. Peker, D., Comert, G. G., & Kence, A. (2010). Three decades of anti-evolution campaign and its results: Turkish undergraduates' acceptance and understanding of the biological evolution theory. Science & Education, 19, 739-755.
48. Rice, D. C., & Kaya, S. (2010). Exploring relations among preservice elementary teachers' ideas about evolution, understanding of relevant science concepts, and college science coursework. Research in Science Education. doi: 10. 1007/s11165-010-9193-2.
49. Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625-637.
50. Rudolph, J. L., & Stewart, J. H. (1998). Evolution and the nature of science: On the historical discord and its implications for education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1069-1089.
51. Rutledge, M. L. (1996). Indiana high school biology teachers and evolutionary theory: Acceptance and understanding. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest dissertations and theses database. (UMI No. 9632834).
52. Rutledge, M. L., & Mitchell, M. A. (2002). High school biology teachers' knowledge structure, acceptance and teaching of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 64(1), 21-28.
53. Rutledge, M. L., & Sadler, K. C. (2007). Reliability of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution (MATE) instrument with university students. The American Biology Teacher, 69, 332-335.
54. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99(1), 13-18.
55. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (2000). Evolutionary theory, the nature of science and high school biology teachers: Critical relationships. American Biology Teacher, 62, 23-31.
56. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika monograph supplement, No. 17.
57. Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2006). The development and validation of the Nature of Science as Argument Questionnaire (NSAAQ). Paper presented at the annual international conference of the national association of research in science teaching (NARST), San Francisco, CA.
58. Sanders, M., & Ngxola, N. (2009). Addressing teachers' concerns about teaching evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 43(3), 121-128. doi: 10(1080/00219266), 2009, 9656166.
59. Savalei, V., & Bentler, P. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling. In R. Grover & M. Vriens (Eds.), The handbook of marketing research: Uses, misuses, and future advances (pp. 330-364). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
60. Scharmann, L. C., & Harris, W. M. (1991). Teaching evolution: Understanding, concerns, and instructional approaches. Paper presented at the Annual international conference of the national association of research in science teaching (NARST), Lake Geneva, WI.
61. Scharmann, L. C., & Harris, W. M. (1992). Teaching evolution: understanding and applying the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 375-388.
62. Scharmann, L. C., Smith, M. U., James, M. C., & Jensen, M. (2005). Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: Evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(1), 27-41.
63. Shankar, G., & Skoog, G. (1993). Emphasis given evolution and creationism by Texas high school biology teachers. Science Education, 77, 221-233.
64. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510-528.
65. Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 83, 493-509.
66. Southerland, S. A., Sinatra, G. M., & Matthews, M. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 325-351.
67. Tekkaya, C., Akyol, G., & Sungur, S. (2010). Evrim teorisini kabul etmeye etki eden faktörler: Evrim bilgisinin ve bilimsel bilginin doǧasi ile ilgili görüşlerin incelenmesi. Poster presented at the meeting of IX. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eǧitimi Kongresi, İzmir, Turkey.
68. Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Ozkan, O. (2004). Turkish pre-service science teachers' understanding of science, and their confidence in teaching science. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30, 57-66.
69. The Council of Higher Education. (2010). The higher education system in Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: The Council of Higher Education.
70. Trani, R. (2004). I won't teach evolution, it's against my religion; And now for the rest of the story. The American Biology Teacher, 66, 419-442.
71. van Dijk, E. M. (2009). Teachers' views on understanding evolutionary theory: A PCK study in the framework of the ERTE-model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 259-267.
72. van Dijk, E. M., & Kattmann, U. (2009). Teaching evolution with historical narratives. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 479-489.
73. van Dijk, E. M., & Reydon, T. A. C. (2010). A conceptual analysis of evolutionary theory for teacher education. Science & Education, 19, 655-677.