The Importance of Understanding the Nature of Science for Accepting Evolution

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 290-298

  Lombrozo, Tania ^a   Thanukos, Anastasia ^a   Weisberg, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accepting evolution; Nature of science; Philosophy of science; Understanding evolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349956687     PISSN: 19366426     EISSN: 19366434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12052-008-0061-8     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alberts B. Editorial: considering science education. Science 2008;319:1589.
2. American Academy or the Advancement of Science (AAAS), AAAS resolution: statement on the teaching of evolution; 2006. Available at: http://archives.aaas.org/docs/resolutions.php?doc-id=443 (accessed April 14, 2008).
3. Bishop BA, Anderson CW. Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. J Res Sci Teach 1990;27:417-25.
4. Brem SK, Ranney M, Schindel J. Perceived consequences of evolution: college students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Sci Educ 2003;87:181-206.
5. Browne J. Charles Darwin: voyaging. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1996.
6. Bybee RW. Teaching about evolution: old controversy, new challenges. BioScience 2001;51:309-12.
7. Carey S, Smith C. On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educ Psychol 1993;3:235-51.
8. Cronjie R. Letter: going public with the scientific process. Science 2008;319:1483-4.
9. Dagher ZR, BouJaoude S. Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: the case of biological evolution. J Res Sci Teach 1997;34:429-45.
10. Dagher ZR, BouJaoude S. Students' perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Sci Educ 2005;89:378-91.
11. Demastes SS, Settlage J, Good RJ. Students' conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: cases of replication and comparison. J Res Sci Teach 1995;32:535-50.
12. Deniz H, Donnelly LA, Yilmaz I. Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. J Res Sci Educ 2008;45:420-43.
13. Farber P. Teaching evolution and the nature of science. Am Biol Teach 2003;65:347-54.
14. Godfrey-Smith P. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2003.
15. Gregory TR. Evolution as fact, theory, and path. Evo Edu Outreach 2008;1:46-52.
16. Huang C, Tsai C, Chang C. An investigation of Taiwanese early adolescents' views about the nature of science. Adolescence 2005;40:645-54.
17. Ingram EL, Nelson CE. Relationship between achievement and students' acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-division evolution course. J Res Sci Teach 2006;43:7-24.
18. Kang S, Scharmann LC, Noh T. Examining students' views on the nature of science: results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders. Sci Educ 2004;89:314-34.
19. Kitcher PS. The advancement of science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1993.
20. Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1962.
21. Lawson AE, Worsnop WA. Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: effects of reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. J Res Sci Teach 1992;29:143-66.
22. Leach J, Driver R, Millar R, Scott P. A study in progression in learning about "the nature of science": issues of conceptualization and methodology. Int J Sci Educ 1997;19:147-66.
23. Liang LL, Chen S, Chen X, Kaya ON, Adams AD, Macklin M, Ebenezer J. Student understanding of science and scientific inquiry: revision and further validation of an assessment instrument. In: Annual Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Francisco, CA; 2006.
24. Lederman NG. Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: a review of research. J Res Sci Teach 1992;29:331-59.
25. Lombrozo T, Shtulman A, Weisberg M. The intelligent design controversy: lessons from psychology and education. Trends Cogn Sci 2006;10:56-7.
26. McKeachie WJ, Lin Y-G, Strayer J. Creationist vs. evolutionary beliefs: effects on learning biology. Am Biol Teach 2002;64:189-92.
27. Meadows L, Doster E, Jackson DF. Managing the conflict between evolution and religion. Am Biol Teach 2000;62:102-7.
28. Miller JD, Scott EC, Okamoto S. Public acceptance of evolution. Science 2006;313:765-6.
29. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Science, evolution, and creationism. Washington, DC: National Academies; 2008a. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=11876 (accessed April 14, 2008).
30. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academies; 2008b. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=5787 (accessed April 14, 2008).
31. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), Position statement: the nature of science. 2000. Available at: http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/natureofscience.aspx (accessed April 14, 2008).
32. Nickels MK, Nelson CE, Beard J. Better biology teaching by emphasizing evolution and the nature of science. Am Biol Teach 1996;59:332-6.
33. Pigliucci M. The evolution-creation wars: why teaching more science is just not enough. McGill J Educ 2007;42:285-306.
34. Rudolph JL, Stewart J. Evolution and the nature of science: on the historical discord and its implications for education. J Res Sci Teach 1998;53:1069-89.
35. Rutledge M, Warden M. Evolutionary theory, the nature of science, and high school biology teachers: critical relationships. Am Biol Teach 2000;62:123-31.
36. Scharmann LC, Harris WM. Teaching evolution: understanding and applying the nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 1992;29:375-88.
37. Scharmann LC, Smith MU, James MC, Jensen M. Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. J Sci Teacher Educ 2005;16:27-41.
38. Scott EC. Evolution vs. creationism. Westport, CT: Greenwood; 2004.
39. Shtulman A. Qualitative differences between naive and scientific theories of evolution. Cogn Psychol 2006;52:170-94.
40. Sinatra GM, Southerland SA, McConaughy F, Demastes JW. Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. J Res Sci Teach 2003;40:510-28.
41. Solomon J, Scott L, Duncan J. Large-scale exploration of pupils' understanding of the nature of science. Sci Educ 1996;80:493-508.
42. Sulloway F. Darwin and his finches: the evolution of a legend. J Hist Biol 1982;115:1-53.
43. Sulloway F. Darwin and the Galapagos. Biol J Linn Soc 1984;21:29-59.
44. Tattersall I. What's so special about science? Evo Edu Outreach 2008;1:36-40.
45. Trani R. I won't teach evolution; It's against my religion. And now for the rest of the story. Am Biol Teach 2004;66:419-27.
46. Verhey SD. The effect of engaging prior learning on student attitudes toward creationism and evolution. Bioscience 2005;55:996-1003.