Ultraslow Water-Mediated Transmembrane Interactions Regulate the Activation of A2A Adenosine Receptor

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 111, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1180-1191

  Lee, Yoonji ^a   Kim, Songmi ^b   Choi, Sun ^a   Hyeon, Changbong ^b  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute for Advanced Study   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE A2 RECEPTOR AGONIST; ADENOSINE A2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; ADENOSINE A2A RECEPTOR; PROTEIN BINDING; WATER;

ALLOSTERISM; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; KINETICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; TIME FACTOR;

ADENOSINE A2 RECEPTOR AGONISTS; ADENOSINE A2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS; ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; CELL MEMBRANE; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; KINETICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; RECEPTOR, ADENOSINE A2A; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 84991624991     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. 1 Rosenbaum, D.M., Rasmussen, S.G., Kobilka, B.K., The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 459 (2009), 356–363.
2. 2 adrenergic receptor-Gs protein complex. Nature 477 (2011), 549–555.
3. 2A receptor structures reveal common features of GPCR activation. Nature 474 (2011), 521–525.
4. 4 Nygaard, R., Frimurer, T.M., et al., Schwartz, T.W., Ligand binding and micro-switches in 7TM receptor structures. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 30 (2009), 249–259.
5. 5 Katritch, V., Cherezov, V., Stevens, R.C., Structure-function of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 53 (2013), 531–556.
6. 2A adenosine receptor. PLOS Comput. Biol., 11, 2015, e1004044.
7. 7 Lee, Y., Choi, S., Hyeon, C., Mapping the intramolecular signal transduction of G-protein coupled receptors. Proteins 82 (2014), 727–743.
8. 8 Tarek, M., Tobias, D.J., The dynamics of protein hydration water: a quantitative comparison of molecular dynamics simulations and neutron-scattering experiments. Biophys. J. 79 (2000), 3244–3257.
9. 9 Ball, P., Water as an active constituent in cell biology. Chem. Rev. 108 (2008), 74–108.
10. 10 Frauenfelder, H., Chen, G., et al., Young, R.D., A unified model of protein dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 (2009), 5129–5134.
11. 11 Tsai, A.M., Neumann, D.A., Bell, L.N., Molecular dynamics of solid-state lysozyme as affected by glycerol and water: a neutron scattering study. Biophys. J. 79 (2000), 2728–2732.
12. 12 Pal, S.K., Peon, J., Zewail, A.H., Biological water at the protein surface: dynamical solvation probed directly with femtosecond resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002), 1763–1768.
13. 13 Jungwirth, P., Biological water or rather water in biology?. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 (2015), 2449–2451.
14. 14 Mallikarjunaiah, K.J., Leftin, A., et al., Brown, M.F., Solid-state ²H NMR shows equivalence of dehydration and osmotic pressures in lipid membrane deformation. Biophys. J. 100 (2011), 98–107.
15. 15 Yuan, S., Filipek, S., et al., Vogel, H., Activation of G-protein-coupled receptors correlates with the formation of a continuous internal water pathway. Nat. Commun., 5, 2014, 4733.
16. 16 Yuan, S., Vogel, H., Filipek, S., The role of water and sodium ions in the activation of the μ-opioid receptor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 52 (2013), 10112–10115.
17. 17 Sun, X., Ågren, H., Tu, Y., Functional water molecules in rhodopsin activation. J. Phys. Chem. B 118 (2014), 10863–10873.
18. 18 Burg, J.S., Ingram, J.R., et al., Garcia, K.C., Structural biology. Structural basis for chemokine recognition and activation of a viral G protein-coupled receptor. Science 347 (2015), 1113–1117.
19. 19 Leioatts, N., Mertz, B., et al., Brown, M.F., Retinal ligand mobility explains internal hydration and reconciles active rhodopsin structures. Biochemistry 53 (2014), 376–385.
20. 2A adenosine receptor. Biophys. J. 102 (2012), 2114–2120.
21. 6.48 opens a gate for a continuous intrinsic water pathway during activation of the adenosine A2A receptor. Angew. Chem. 127 (2015), 566–569.
22. 2A adenosine receptor as a key study. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 54 (2014), 2846–2855.
23. 2 adrenergic receptor from active to inactive conformation and its implication for the closed/open state of the water channel: insight from molecular dynamics simulation, free energy calculation and Markov state model analysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 (2014), 15874–15885.
24. 24 Grossfield, A., Pitman, M.C., et al., Gawrisch, K., Internal hydration increases during activation of the G-protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol. 381 (2008), 478–486.
25. 25 Jardón-Valadez, E., Bondar, A.-N., Tobias, D.J., Coupling of retinal, protein, and water dynamics in squid rhodopsin. Biophys. J. 99 (2010), 2200–2207.
26. 26 Selent, J., Sanz, F., et al., De Fabritiis, G., Induced effects of sodium ions on dopaminergic G-protein coupled receptors. PLOS Comput. Biol., 6, 2010, e1000884.
27. 27 Liu, W., Chun, E., et al., Stevens, R.C., Structural basis for allosteric regulation of GPCRs by sodium ions. Science 337 (2012), 232–236.
28. 28 Venkatakrishnan, A.J., Deupi, X., et al., Babu, M.M., Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 494 (2013), 185–194.
29. 29 Raghavender, U.S., Aravinda, S., et al., Balaram, P., Characterization of water wires inside hydrophobic tubular peptide structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009), 15130–15132.
30. 30 Reddy, G., Straub, J.E., Thirumalai, D., Dry amyloid fibril assembly in a yeast prion peptide is mediated by long-lived structures containing water wires. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 (2010), 21459–21464.
31. 31 Thirumalai, D., Reddy, G., Straub, J.E., Role of water in protein aggregation and amyloid polymorphism. Acc. Chem. Res. 45 (2012), 83–92.
32. 2A adenosine receptor. Science 332 (2011), 322–327.
33. 2A adenosine receptor bound to an antagonist. Science 322 (2008), 1211–1217.
34. 2A receptor in complex with ZM241385 and the xanthines XAC and caffeine. Structure 19 (2011), 1283–1293.
35. 35 Phillips, J.C., Braun, R., et al., Schulten, K., Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26 (2005), 1781–1802.
36. 36 Buck, M., Bouguet-Bonnet, S., et al., MacKerell, A.D. Jr., Importance of the CMAP correction to the CHARMM22 protein force field: dynamics of hen lysozyme. Biophys. J. 90 (2006), L36–L38.
37. 37 Zoete, V., Cuendet, M.A., et al., Michielin, O., SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 32 (2011), 2359–2368.
38. 38 Kučerka, N., Nieh, M.-P., Katsaras, J., Fluid phase lipid areas and bilayer thicknesses of commonly used phosphatidylcholines as a function of temperature. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1808 (2011), 2761–2771.
39. 39 Tsai, H.-H.G., Lee, J.-B., et al., Juwita, R., A molecular dynamics study of the structural and dynamical properties of putative arsenic substituted lipid bilayers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14 (2013), 7702–7715.
40. 40 Luzar, A., Chandler, D., Hydrogen-bond kinetics in liquid water. Nature 379 (1996), 55–57.
41. 41 Yoon, J., Lin, J.-C., et al., Thirumalai, D., Dynamical transition and heterogeneous hydration dynamics in RNA. J. Phys. Chem. B 118 (2014), 7910–7919.
42. 42 Freeman, L., Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1 (1979), 215–239.
43. 43 Strogatz, S.H., Exploring complex networks. Nature 410 (2001), 268–276.
44. 44 Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabási, A.L., Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406 (2000), 378–382.
45. 45 Newman, M., A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Soc. Networks 27 (2005), 39–54.
46. 46 Greene, L.H., Higman, V.A., Uncovering network systems within protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 334 (2003), 781–791.
47. 47 Amitai, G., Shemesh, A., et al., Pietrokovski, S., Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. J. Mol. Biol. 344 (2004), 1135–1146.
48. 48 Del Sol, A., Fujihashi, H., et al., Nussinov, R., Residues crucial for maintaining short paths in network communication mediate signaling in proteins. Mol. Sys. Biol., 2, 2006, 2006.0019.
49. 49 Bagler, G., Sinha, S., Assortative mixing in protein contact networks and protein folding kinetics. Bioinformatics 23 (2007), 1760–1767.
50. 50 Vendruscolo, M., Dokholyan, N.V., et al., Karplus, M., Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys., 65, 2002, 061910.
51. 51 Dokholyan, N.V., Li, L., et al., Shakhnovich, E.I., Topological determinants of protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002), 8637–8641.
52. 52 Brandes, U., A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J. Math. Sociol. 25 (2001), 163–177.
53. 53 Franck, J.M., Sokolovski, M., et al., Horovitz, A., Probing water density and dynamics in the chaperonin GroEL cavity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014), 9396–9403.
54. 54 Franck, J.M., Ding, Y., et al., Han, S., Anomalously rapid hydration water diffusion dynamics near DNA surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015), 12013–12023.
55. 55 Smart, O.S., Neduvelil, J.G., et al., Sansom, M.S., HOLE: a program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J. Mol. Graph. 14 (1996), 354–360 376.
56. 2A receptor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013), 8749–8759.
57. 57 Aryal, P., Abd-Wahab, F., et al., Tucker, S.J., A hydrophobic barrier deep within the inner pore of the TWIK-1 K2P potassium channel. Nat. Commun., 5, 2014, 4377.
58. 58 Anishkin, A., Sukharev, S., Water dynamics and dewetting transitions in the small mechanosensitive channel MscS. Biophys. J. 86 (2004), 2883–2895.
59. 59 Isom, D.G., Dohlman, H.G., Buried ionizable networks are an ancient hallmark of G protein-coupled receptor activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 (2015), 5702–5707.
60. 60 Aryal, P., Sansom, M.S., Tucker, S.J., Hydrophobic gating in ion channels. J. Mol. Biol. 427 (2015), 121–130.
61. 61 Powell, M.R., Cleary, L., et al., Siwy, Z.S., Electric-field-induced wetting and dewetting in single hydrophobic nanopores. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 (2011), 798–802.
62. 62 Kobilka, B.K., Deupi, X., Conformational complexity of G-protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 28 (2007), 397–406.
63. 63 Hilser, V.J., Wrabl, J.O., Motlagh, H.N., Structural and energetic basis of allostery. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 41 (2012), 585–609.
64. 64 Motlagh, H.N., Wrabl, J.O., et al., Hilser, V.J., The ensemble nature of allostery. Nature 508 (2014), 331–339.
65. 65 Lockless, S.W., Ranganathan, R., Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 286 (1999), 295–299.
66. 66 Halabi, N., Rivoire, O., et al., Ranganathan, R., Protein sectors: evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure. Cell 138 (2009), 774–786.
67. 67 Zheng, W., Brooks, B.R., et al., Thirumalai, D., Network of dynamically important residues in the open/closed transition in polymerases is strongly conserved. Structure 13 (2005), 565–577.
68. 68 Ribeiro, A.A., Ortiz, V., Determination of signaling pathways in proteins through network theory: importance of the topology. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10 (2014), 1762–1769.
69. 69 Feher, V.A., Durrant, J.D., et al., Amaro, R.E., Computational approaches to mapping allosteric pathways. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 25 (2014), 98–103.
70. 70 Di Paola, L., Giuliani, A., Protein contact network topology: a natural language for allostery. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 31 (2015), 43–48.
71. 71 Leitner, D.M., Water-mediated energy dynamics in a homodimeric hemoglobin. J. Phys. Chem. B 120 (2016), 4019–4027.
72. 72 Yoon, J., Thirumalai, D., Hyeon, C., Urea-induced denaturation of preQ1-riboswitch. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013), 12112–12121.
73. 73 Réat, V., Dunn, R., et al., Smith, J.C., Solvent dependence of dynamic transitions in protein solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000), 9961–9966.
74. 74 Fitter, J., Lechner, R.E., et al., Dencher, N.A., Internal molecular motions of bacteriorhodopsin: hydration-induced flexibility studied by quasielastic incoherent neutron scattering using oriented purple membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996), 7600–7605.