Activation of the ATR kinase by the RPA-binding protein ETAA1

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 1196-1207

  Haahr, Peter ^a   Hoffmann, Saskia ^a   Tollenaere, Maxim A X ^a   Ho, Teresa ^a,b   Toledo, Luis Ignacio ^a   Mann, Matthias ^c   Bekker Jensen, Simon ^a   Räschle, Markus ^c,d   Mailand, Niels ^a,b  

^a University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^d Rheinland Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATR PROTEIN; CELL PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; EWING TUMOR ASSOCIATED ANTIGEN 1; HISTONE H2AX; TOPBP1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN, HUMAN; ATRIP PROTEIN, HUMAN; CARRIER PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; ETAA1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; MEMBRANE ANTIGEN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCING ADAPTOR PROTEIN; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; TOPBP1 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ARTICLE; CELL SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DNA REPLICATION; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; OSTEOSARCOMA CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; GENETICS; HELA CELL LINE; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; ANTIGENS, SURFACE; ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED PROTEINS; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION;

EID: 84990909330     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3422     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Hoeijmakers, J. H. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411, 366-374 (2001).
2. Lindahl, T. & Barnes, D. E. Repair of endogenous DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 65, 127-133 (2000).
3. Jackson, S. P. & Bartek, J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 461, 1071-1078 (2009).
4. Ciccia, A. & Elledge, S. J. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 40, 179-204 (2010).
5. Matsuoka, S. et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316, 1160-1166 (2007).
6. Bensimon, A. et al. ATM-dependent and-independent dynamics of the nuclear phosphoproteome after DNA damage. Sci. Signal. 3, rs3 (2010).
7. Beli, P. et al. Proteomic investigations reveal a role for RNA processing factor THRAP3 in the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 46, 212-225 (2012).
8. Marechal, A. & Zou, L. DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012716 (2013).
9. Liu, Q. et al. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 14, 1448-1459 (2000).
10. Matsuoka, S., Huang, M. & Elledge, S. J. Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 282, 1893-1897 (1998).
11. O'Driscoll, M., Ruiz-Perez, V. L., Woods, C. G., Jeggo, P. A. & Goodship, J. A. A splicing mutation affecting expression of ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) results in Seckel syndrome. Nat. Genet. 33, 497-501 (2003).
12. Shiloh, Y. & Ziv, Y. The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 197-210 (2013).
13. Zeman, M. K. & Cimprich, K. A. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 2-9 (2014).
14. Cimprich, K. A. & Cortez, D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 616-627 (2008).
15. Brown, E. J. & Baltimore, D. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 14, 397-402 (2000).
16. de Klein, A. et al. Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr. Biol. 10, 479-482 (2000).
17. Byun, T. S., Pacek, M., Yee, M. C., Walter, J. C. & Cimprich, K. A. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATRdependent checkpoint. Genes Dev. 19, 1040-1052 (2005).
18. Zou, L. & Elledge, S. J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPAssDNA complexes. Science 300, 1542-1548 (2003).
19. Cortez, D., Guntuku, S., Qin, J. & Elledge, S. J. ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 294, 1713-1716 (2001).
20. Delacroix, S., Wagner, J. M., Kobayashi, M., Yamamoto, K. & Karnitz, L. M. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1. Genes Dev. 21, 1472-1477 (2007).
21. Lee, J., Kumagai, A. & Dunphy, W. G. The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 checkpoint clamp regulates interaction of TopBP1 with ATR. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 28036-28044 (2007).
22. Cotta-Ramusino, C. et al. A DNA damage response screen identifies RHINO, a 9-1-1 and TopBP1 interacting protein required for ATR signaling. Science 332, 1313-1317 (2011).
23. Duursma, A. M., Driscoll, R., Elias, J. E. & Cimprich, K. A. A role for the MRN complex in ATR activation via TOPBP1 recruitment. Mol. Cell 50, 116-122 (2013).
24. Zou, L., Cortez, D. & Elledge, S. J. Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin. Genes Dev. 16, 198-208 (2002).
25. Parrilla-Castellar, E. R., Arlander, S. J. & Karnitz, L. Dial 9-1-1 for DNA damage: the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp complex. DNA Repair (Amst) 3, 1009-1014 (2004).
26. Kumagai, A., Lee, J., Yoo, H. Y. & Dunphy, W. G. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 124, 943-955 (2006).
27. Mordes, D. A., Glick, G. G., Zhao, R. & Cortez, D. TopBP1 activates ATR through ATRIP and a PIKK regulatory domain. Genes Dev. 22, 1478-1489 (2008).
28. Zhou, Z. W. et al. An essential function for the ATR-activation-domain (AAD) of TopBP1 in mouse development and cellular senescence. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003702 (2013).
29. Navadgi-Patil, V. M. & Burgers, P. M. The unstructured C-terminal tail of the 9-1-1 clamp subunit Ddc1 activates Mec1/ATR via two distinct mechanisms. Mol. Cell 36, 743-753 (2009).
30. Kumar, S. & Burgers, P. M. Lagging strand maturation factor Dna2 is a component of the replication checkpoint initiation machinery. Genes Dev. 27, 313-321 (2013).
31. Raschle, M. et al. Proteomics reveals dynamic assembly of repair complexes during bypass of DNA cross-links. Science 348, 1253671 (2015).
32. Borowski, A. et al. Structure and function of ETAA16: a novel cell surface antigen in Ewing's tumours. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 55, 363-374 (2006).
33. Bekker-Jensen, S. et al. Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 173, 195-206 (2006).
34. Symington, L. S. & Gautier, J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 247-271 (2011).
35. Mer, G. et al. Structural basis for the recognition of DNA repair proteins UNG2, XPA, and RAD52 by replication factor RPA. Cell 103, 449-456 (2000).
36. Ciccia, A. et al. The SIOD disorder protein SMARCAL1 is an RPA-interacting protein involved in replication fork restart. Genes Dev. 23, 2415-2425 (2009).
37. Unsal-Kacmaz, K. et al. The human Tim/Tipin complex coordinates an intra-S checkpoint response to UV that slows replication fork displacement. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 3131-3142 (2007).
38. Xu, X. et al. The basic cleft of RPA70N binds multiple checkpoint proteins, including RAD9, to regulate ATR signaling. Mol. Cell Biol. 28, 7345-7353 (2008).
39. Toledo, L. I., Murga, M., Gutierrez-Martinez, P., Soria, R. & Fernandez-Capetillo, O. ATR signaling can drive cells into senescence in the absence of DNA breaks. Genes Dev. 22, 297-302 (2008).
40. Ward, I. M. & Chen, J. Histone H2AX is phosphorylated in an ATR-dependent manner in response to replicational stress. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 47759-47762 (2001).
41. Shiotani, B. et al. Two distinct modes of ATR activation orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1. Cell Rep. 3, 1651-1662 (2013).
42. Toledo, L. I. et al. ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA. Cell 155, 1088-1103 (2013).
43. Couch, F. B. et al. ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse. Genes Dev. 27, 1610-1623 (2013).
44. Lukas, C. et al. 53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 243-253 (2011).
45. Toledo, L. I. et al. A cell-based screen identifies ATR inhibitors with synthetic lethal properties for cancer-associated mutations. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 721-727 (2011).
46. Bass, T. E. et al. ETAA1 acts at stalled replication forks to maintain genome integrity. Nat. Cell Biol. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1038/ncb3415 (2016).
47. Wanrooij, P. H., Tannous, E., Kumar, S., Navadgi-Patil, V. M. & Burgers, P. M. Probing the Mec1ATR checkpoint activation mechanism with small peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 393-401 (2016).
48. Bastos de Oliveira, F. M. Phosphoproteomics reveals distinct modes of Mec1/ATR signaling during DNA replication. Mol. Cell 57, 1124-1132 (2015).
49. Fokas, E. et al. Targeting ATR in DNA damage response and cancer therapeutics. Cancer Treat. Rev. 40, 109-117 (2014).
50. Lopez-Contreras, A. J. & Fernandez-Capetillo, O. The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 9, 1249-1255 (2010).
51. Childs, E. J. et al. Common variation at 2p13. 3, 3q29, 7p13 and 17q25. 1 associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Nat. Genet. 47, 911-916 (2015).
52. Wu, C. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five loci associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer in Chinese populations. Nat. Genet. 44, 62-66 (2012).
53. Cox, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol. Cell Proteomics 13, 2513-2526 (2014).
54. Tusher, V. G., Tibshirani, R. & Chu, G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5116-5121 (2001).
55. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823 (2013).
56. Mosbech, A. et al. DVC1 (C1orf124) is a DNA damage-targeting p97 adaptor that promotes ubiquitin-dependent responses to replication blocks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1084-1092 (2012).
57. Poulsen, M., Lukas, C., Lukas, J., Bekker-Jensen, S. & Mailand, N. Human RNF169 is a negative regulator of the ubiquitin-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 197, 189-199 (2012).
58. Vichai, V. & Kirtikara, K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1112-1116 (2006).
59. Ong, S. E. & Mann, M. A practical recipe for stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). Nat. Protoc. 1, 2650-2660 (2006).
60. Humphrey, S. J., Azimifar, S. B. & Mann, M. High-throughput phosphoproteomics reveals in vivo insulin signaling dynamics. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 990-995 (2015).
61. Vizcaino, J. A. et al. ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 223-226 (2014).