Identifying and removing the cell-cycle effect from single-cell RNA-Sequencing data

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Barron, Martin ^a   Li, Jun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84988815163     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep33892     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Trapnell, C. Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics. Genome Res. 25, 1491-1498 (2015).
2. Wills, Q. F., Mead, A. J. Application of single-cell genomics in cancer: promise and challenges. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, R74-R84 (2015).
3. Navin, N. E. The first five years of single-cell cancer genomics and beyond. Genome Res. 25, 1499-1507 (2015).
4. Sandberg, R. Entering the era of single-cell transcriptomics in biology and medicine. Nat. Methods 11, 22-24 (2014).
5. Wen, L., Tang, F. Reconstructing complex tissues from single-cell analyses. Cell 157, 771-773 (2014).
6. Wang, Y., Navin, N. E. Advances and Applications of Single-Cell Sequencing Technologies. Mol. Cell 58, 598-609 (2015).
7. Shapiro, E., Biezuner, T., Linnarsson, S. Single-cell sequencing-based technologies will revolutionize whole-organism science. Nat Rev Genet 14, 618-630 (2013).
8. Efroni, I., Ip, P.-L., Nawy, T., Mello, A., Birnbaum, K. D. Quantification of cell identity from single-cell gene expression profiles. Genome Biol. 16, 9 (2015).
9. Björklund, Å. K. et al. The heterogeneity of human CD127+ innate lymphoid cells revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Immunol. 17, 451-460 (2016).
10. Zeisel, A. et al. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 347, 1138-1142 (2015).
11. Tasic, B. et al. Adult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 335-346 (2016).
12. Buettner, F. et al. Computational analysis of cell-to-cell heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-sequencing data reveals hidden subpopulations of cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 155-160 (2015).
13. Pierson, E., Yau, C. ZIFA: Dimensionality reduction for zero-inflated single-cell gene expression analysis. Genome Biol. 16, 241 (2015).
14. Xu, C., Su, Z. Identification of cell types from single-cell transcriptomes using a novel clustering method. Bioinformatics btv088. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv088 (2015).
15. Stegle, O., Teichmann, S. A., Marioni, J. C. Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 133-145 (2015).
16. Brennecke, P. et al. Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Nat. Methods 10, 1093-1095 (2013).
17. Kim, J. K., Kolodziejczyk, A. A., Illicic, T., Teichmann, S. A., Marioni, J. C. Characterizing noise structure in single-cell RNA-seq distinguishes genuine from technical stochastic allelic expression. Nat. Commun. 6, 8687 (2015).
18. Vallejos, C. A., Marioni, J. C., Richardson, S. BASiCS: Bayesian Analysis of Single-Cell Sequencing Data. PLoS Comput Biol 11, e1004333 (2015).
19. Leng, N. et al. OEFinder: A user interface to identify and visualize ordering effects in single-cell RNA-seq data. bioRxiv 25437 (2015).
20. Grun, D., Kester, L., van Oudenaarden, A. Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 11, 637-640 (2014).
21. Bacher, R., Kendziorski, C. Design and computational analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Genome Biol. 17, 63 (2016).
22. Bacher, R., Kendziorski, C. Design and computational analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Genome Biol. 17, (2016).
23. Hicks, S. C., Teng, M., Irizarry, R. A. On the widespread and critical impact of systematic bias and batch effects in single-cell RNASeq data. bioRxiv 25528 (2015).
24. Irizarry, R. A. et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostat. Oxf. Engl. 4, 249-264 (2003).
25. Benito, M. et al. Adjustment of systematic microarray data biases. Bioinformatics 20, 105-114 (2004).
26. Gagnon-Bartsch, J. A., Speed, T. P. Using control genes to correct for unwanted variation in microarray data. Biostat. Oxf. Engl. 13, 539-552 (2012).
27. Tsang, J. C. H. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic reconstruction reveals cell cycle and multi-lineage differentiation defects in Bcl11adeficient hematopoietic stem cells. Genome Biol. 16, 178 (2015).
28. Kowalczyk, M. S. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals changes in cell cycle and differentiation programs upon aging of hematopoietic stem cells. Genome Res. 25, 1860-1872 (2015).
29. Trapnell, C. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotech 32, 381-386 (2014).
30. Shin, J. et al. Single-Cell RNA-Seq with Waterfall Reveals Molecular Cascades underlying Adult Neurogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 17, 360-372 (2015).
31. Juliá, M., Telenti, A., Rausell, A. Sincell: an R/Bioconductor package for statistical assessment of cell-state hierarchies from singlecell RNA-seq. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 31, 3380-3382 (2015).
32. Bendall, S. C. et al. Single-cell trajectory detection uncovers progression and regulatory coordination in human B cell development. Cell 157, 714-725 (2014).
33. Sasagawa, Y. et al. Quartz-Seq: a highly reproducible and sensitive single-cell RNA sequencing method, reveals non-genetic geneexpression heterogeneity. Genome Biol. 14, R31 (2013).
34. Singh, A. M. et al. Cell-Cycle Control of Developmentally Regulated Transcription Factors Accounts for Heterogeneity in Human Pluripotent Cells. Stem Cell Rep. 1, 532-544 (2013).
35. Scialdone, A. et al. Computational assignment of cell-cycle stage from single-cell transcriptome data. Methods 85, 54-61 (2015).
36. R Core Team. R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015).
37. Huber, W. et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat. Methods 12, 115-121 (2015).
38. Smedley, D. et al. The BioMart community portal: an innovative alternative to large, centralized data repositories. Nucleic Acids Res. gkv350, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv350 (2015).
39. Consortium, T. G. O. Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D1049-D1056 (2015).
40. Carlson, M. org.Mm.eg.db: Genome wide annotation for Mouse.
41. Carlson, M. org.Hs.eg.db: Genome wide annotation for Human.
42. Mahata, B. et al. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals T Helper Cells Synthesizing Steroids De Novo to Contribute to Immune Homeostasis. Cell Rep. 7, 1130-1142 (2014).
43. Santos, A., Wernersson, R., Jensen, L. J. Cyclebase 3.0: a multi-organism database on cell-cycle regulation and phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res. gku1092, doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1092 (2014).
44. Shalek, A. K. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells. Nature 498, 236-240 (2013).
45. Finak, G. et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015).
46. Kharchenko, P. V., Silberstein, L., Scadden, D. T. Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat. Methods 11, 740-742 (2014).
47. Patel, A. P. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 344, 1396-1401 (2014).
48. Kim, K.-T. et al. Single-cell mRNA sequencing identifies subclonal heterogeneity in anti-cancer drug responses of lung adenocarcinoma cells. Genome Biol. 16, 127 (2015).
49. Leek, J. T. et al. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 733-739 (2010).
50. Jacob, L., Gagnon-Bartsch, J. A., Speed, T. P. Correcting gene expression data when neither the unwanted variation nor the factor of interest are observed. Biostatistics 17, 16-28 (2016).
51. Johann, A. Gagnon-Bartsch, Laurent Jacob & Terence P. Speed. Removing Unwanted Variation from High Dimensional Data with Negative Controls. (2013).
52. Bradley, Efron & Robert, J. Tibshirani. An introduction to the bootstrap (CRC press, 1994).