Erratum: Characterizing noise structure in single-cell RNA-seq distinguishes genuine from technical stochastic allelic expression (Nature Communications (2015) 6:8687 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9687);Characterizing noise structure in single-cell RNA-seq distinguishes genuine from technical stochastic allelic expression

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Kim, Jong Kyoung ^a   Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandra A ^a   Illicic, Tomislav ^a   Teichmann, Sarah A ^a   Marioni, John C ^a  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; RNA;

ALLELE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NOISE; SPIKE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STOCHASTIC MODEL; ANIMAL; ARTIFACT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; MARKOV CHAIN; MOUSE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS;

RNA;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; MICE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; RNA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84944901262     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10415     Document Type: Erratum

References (28)

1. Yan, L. et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1131-1139 (2013).
2. Tang, F. et al. Tracing the derivation of embryonic stem cells from the inner cell mass by single-cell RNA-Seq analysis. Cell Stem Cell 6, 468-478 (2010).
3. Shalek, A. K. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells. Nature 498, 236-240 (2013).
4. Shalek, A. K. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic paracrine control of cellular variation. Nature 510, 363-369 (2014).
5. Marinov, G. K. et al. From single-cell to cell-pool transcriptomes: stochasticity in gene expression and RNA splicing. Genome Res. 24, 496-510 (2014).
6. Jaitin, D. A. et al. Massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types. Science 343, 776-779 (2014).
7. Treutlein, B. et al. Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lung epithelium using single-cell RNA-seq. Nature 509, 371-375 (2014).
8. Patel, A. P. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 344, 1396-1401 (2014).
9. Kolodziejczyk, A. A., Kim, J. K., Svensson, V., Marioni, J. C., Teichmann, S. A. The technology and biology of single-cell RNA sequencing. Mol. Cell 58, 610-620 (2015).
10. Gru'n, D., Kester, L., van Oudenaarden, A. Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 11, 637-640 (2014).
11. Wu, A. R. et al. Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods. Nat. Methods 11, 41-46 (2014).
12. Brennecke, P. et al. Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Nat. Methods 10, 1093-1095 (2013).
13. Islam, S. et al. Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers. Nat. Methods 11, 163-166 (2014).
14. Tang, F. et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6, 377-382 (2009).
15. Ramskold, D. et al. Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nature Biotechnol. 30, 777-782 (2012).
16. Picelli, S. et al. Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat. Methods 10, 1096-1098 (2013).
17. Deng, Q., Ramskold, D., Reinius, B., Sandberg, R. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic, random monoallelic gene expression in mammalian cells. Science 343, 193-196 (2014).
18. Bowsher, C. G., Swain, P. S. Identifying sources of variation and the flow of information in biochemical networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1320-E1329 (2012).
19. Eckersley-Maslin, M. A. et al. Random monoallelic gene expression increases upon embryonic stem cell differentiation. Dev. Cell 28, 351-365 (2014).
20. Borel, C. et al. Biased allelic expression in human primary fibroblast single cells. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 96, 70-80 (2015).
21. Kim, J. K., Marioni, J. C. Inferring the kinetics of stochastic gene expression from single-cell RNA-sequencing data. Genome Biol. 14, R7 (2013).
22. Kharchenko, P. V., Silberstein, L., Scadden, D. T. Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat. Methods (2014).
23. George, S. H. L. et al. Developmental and adult phenotyping directly from mutant embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4455-4460 (2007).
24. Wu, T. D., Nacu, S. Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads. Bioinformatics 26, 873-881 (2010).
25. Anders, S., Pyl, P. T., Huber, W. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166-169 (2015).
26. Keane, T. M. et al. Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477, 289-294 (2011).
27. Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
28. Stevenson, K. R., Coolon, J. D., Wittkopp, P. J. Sources of bias in measures of allele-specific expression derived from RNA-sequence data aligned to a single reference genome. BMC Genomics 14, 536 (2013).