Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 354, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Kyrgiou, Maria ^a,b   Athanasiou, Antonios ^c   Paraskevaidi, Maria ^a   Mitra, Anita ^a,b   Kalliala, Ilkka ^a   Martin Hirsch, Pierre ^d,e   Arbyn, Marc ^f   Bennett, Phillip ^a,b   Paraskevaidis, Evangelos ^c  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN CHARLOTTE S AND CHELSEA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^d LANCASHIRE TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ANALGESIA; APGAR SCORE; BLEEDING; CANCER RISK; CERVICAL STENOSIS; CHORIOAMNIONITIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; EXCISION; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT PARAMETERS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; OBSTETRIC DELIVERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE FETUS MEMBRANE RUPTURE; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STENOSIS; STILLBIRTH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CERCLAGE; UTERINE CERVIX CONE DEPTH; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE; ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; FEMALE; META ANALYSIS; OBSTETRIC LABOR, PREMATURE; PATHOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, NEOPLASTIC; PREMATURE BIRTH; PROCEDURES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTERINE CERVIX;

ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CERVIX UTERI; CONIZATION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; OBSTETRIC LABOR, PREMATURE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, NEOPLASTIC; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE BIRTH; RISK FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84980332101     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i3633     Document Type: Review

References (140)

1. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367:489-98. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6.
2. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ 2008;337:a1284. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1284.
3. Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M, et al. Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2014;349:g6192. doi:10.1136/bmj.g6192.
4. Bruinsma FJ, Quinn MA. The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and metaanalysis. BJOG 2011;118:1031-41. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02944.x.
5. Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Thoresen S, Irgens LM, Iversen OE. Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study. BMJ 2008;337:a1343. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1343.
6. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and subsequent risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a population-based study of singleton deliveries during a 9-year period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:33. e1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.004.
7. Kyrgiou M, Arbyn M, Martin-Hirsch P, Paraskevaidis E. Increased risk of preterm birth after treatment for CIN. BMJ 2012;345:e5847. doi:10.1136/bmj.e5847.
8. Phadnis SV, Atilade A, Bowring J, et al. Regeneration of cervix after excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a study of collagen distribution. Regeneration of cervix after excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a study of collagen distribution. BJOG 2011;118:1585-91. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03085.x.
9. Cervical Cancer Screening. Cervical Cancer Screening 2015 http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/.
10. Henk HJ, Insinga RP, Singhal PK, Darkow T. Incidence and costs of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a US commercially insured population. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2010;14:29-36. doi:10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181ac05e9.
11. Petry KU, Breugelmans JG, Bénard S, Lamure E, Littlewood KJ, Hillemanns P. Cost of screening and treatment of cervical dyskaryosis in Germany. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2008;29:345-9.
12. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Sainio S, Paavonen J, Tapper AM. Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:309-13. doi:10.1097/01. AOG.0000253239.87040.23.
13. Ortoft G, Henriksen T, Hansen E, Petersen L. After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy. BJOG 2010;117:258-67. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02438.x.
14. Reilly R, Paranjothy S, Beer H, Brooks CJ, Fielder HM, Lyons RA. Birth outcomes following treatment for precancerous changes to the cervix: a population-based record linkage study. BJOG 2012;119:236-44. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03052.x.
15. Castanon A, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, et al. PaCT Study Group. Risk of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women attending colposcopy in England: retrospectiveprospective cohort study. BMJ 2012;345:e5174. doi:10.1136/bmj.e5174.
16. Conner SN, Frey HA, Cahill AG, Macones GA, Colditz GA, Tuuli MG. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:752-61. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000174.
17. Jin G, Lan Lan Z, Li C, Dan Z. Pregnancy outcome following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;289:85-99. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2955-0.
18. Danhof NA, Kamphuis EI, Limpens J, van Lonkhuijzen LR, Pajkrt E, Mol BW. The risk of preterm birth of treated versus untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015;188:24-33. doi:10.1016/j. ejogrb.2015.02.033.
19. Crane JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1058-62.
20. Founta C, Arbyn M, Valasoulis G, et al. Proportion of excision and cervical healing after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BJOG 2010;117:1468-74. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02709.x.
21. Kyrgiou M, Valasoulis G, Stasinou SM, et al. Proportion of cervical excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;128:141-7. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.038.
22. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical-epidemiology/nos-manual.pdf.
23. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12. doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008.
24. Der Simonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.
25. Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954;10:101-29. doi:10.2307/3001666.
26. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-60. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
27. Deeks J, Altman D, Bradburn M. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis.BMJ Publication Group, 2001. doi:10.1002/9780470693926.ch15.
28. Jones JM, Sweetnam P, Hibbard BM. The outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy of the cervix: a case-control study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979;86:913-6. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb11237.x.
29. Weber T, Obel EB. Pregnancy complications following conization of the uterine cervix (II). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979;58:347-51. doi:10.3109/00016347909154594.
30. Buller RE, Jones HW 3rd. Pregnancy following cervical conization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:506-12. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(82)90752-9.
31. Hemmingsson E. Outcome of third trimester pregnancies after cryotherapy of the uterine cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982;89:675-7. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04725.x.
32. Larsson G, Grundsell H, Gullberg B, Svennerud S. Outcome of pregnancy after conization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982;61:461-6. doi:10.3109/00016348209156591.
33. Ludviksson K, Sandström B. Outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy-a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1982;14:135-42. doi:10.1016/0028-2243(82)90088-0.
34. Moinian M, Andersch B. Does cervix conization increase the risk of complications in subsequent pregnancies? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982;61:101-3. doi:10.3109/00016348209156537.
35. Anderson MC, Horwell DH, Broby Z. Outcome of pregnancy after laser vaporization conization. J Gynecol Surg 1984;1:35-9. doi:10.1089/gyn.1984.1.35.
36. Kristensen GB. The outcome of pregnancy and preterm delivery after conization of the cervix. Arch Gynecol 1985;236:127-30. doi:10.1007/BF02133954.
37. Kuoppala T, Saarikoski S. Pregnancy and delivery after cone biopsy of the cervix. Arch Gynecol 1986;237:149-54. doi:10.1007/BF02133858.
38. Saunders N, Fenton DW, Soutter WP, Brown VA, Sharp F, Abernethy F. A case controlled study of the outcome of pregnancy following laser vapourization cone of the cervix. In: Sharp F, Jordan JA, eds. Gynaecological laser surgery: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Reproductive and perinatal medicine (VI). Ithaca, New York: Perinatology Press; 1986:121-5.
39. Gunasekera PC, Lewis BV, Phipps JH. Obstetric outcome after cervical surgery for intra-epithelial neoplasia. J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;12:291-3. doi:10.3109/01443619209015508.
40. Blomfield PI, Buxton J, Dunn J, Luesley DM. Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:620-5. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90633-T.
41. Haffenden DK, Bigrigg A, Codling BW, Read MD. Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:1059-60. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15153.x.
42. Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE. The outcome of pregnancy after CO2 laser conisation of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:717-20. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14261.x.
43. Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Kristensen FB. Increased risk of preterm birth in women with cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:1005-8.
44. Braet PG, Peel JM, Fenton DW. A case controlled study of the outcome of pregnancy following loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone. J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;14:79-82. doi:10.3109/01443619409030016.
45. Cruickshank ME, Flannelly G, Campbell DM, Kitchener HC. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:467-70. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11319.x.
46. Sagot P, Caroit Y, Winer N, Lopes P, Boog G. Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conisation of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995;58:53-8. doi:10.1016/0028-2243(94)01986-H.
47. Spitzer M, Herman J, Krumholz BA, Lesser M. The fertility of women after cervical laser surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:504-8. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00237-L.
48. Békássy Z, Iosif CS. Laser 'miniconisation' and the outcome of subsequent pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1996;258:75-9.
49. Forsmo S, Hansen MH, Jacobsen BK, Oian P. Pregnancy outcome after laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:139-43. doi:10.3109/00016349609033306.
50. Turlington WT, Wright BD, Powell JL. Impact of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future fertility. J Reprod Med 1996;41:815-8.
51. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Lüscher KP. Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: influence of cone height. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:978-82. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00489-4.
52. Andersen ES, Pedersen B, Boris J. Pregnancy outcome after combination laser conization: a case-control study. J Gynecol Surg 1999;15:7-12. doi:10.1089/gyn.1999.15.7.
53. El-Bastawissi AY, Becker TM, Daling JR. Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:207-12.
54. van Rooijen M, Persson E. Pregnancy outcome after laser vaporization of the cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:346-8. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.1999.780414.x.
55. Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Lolis E, Papanikou E, Malamou-Mitsi V, Agnantis NJ. Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage IA1) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002;86:10-3. doi:10.1006/gyno.2002.6650.
56. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 2004;291:2100-6. doi:10.1001/jama.291.17.2100.
57. Tan L, Pepra E, Haloob RK. The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;24:25-7. doi:10.1080/01443610310001620242.
58. Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen SM, Sørheim N, Jacobsen BK, Maltau JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005;272:109-12. doi:10.1007/s00404-005-0727-1.
59. Samson SL, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, McKay DJ, Gill GH. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:325-32. doi:10.1097/01. AOG.0000151991.09124.bb.
60. Crane JM, Delaney T, Hutchens D. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:37-44. doi:10.1097/01. AOG.0000192169.44775.76.
61. Klaritsch P, Reich O, Giuliani A, Tamussino K, Haas J, Winter R. Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:604-7. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.04.003.
62. Bruinsma F, Lumley J, Tan J, Quinn M. Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth. BJOG 2007;114:70-80. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01107.x.
63. Himes KP, Simhan HN. Time from cervical conization to pregnancy and preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:314-9. doi:10.1097/01. AOG.0000251497.55065.74.
64. Sjøborg KD, Vistad I, Myhr SS, et al. Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:423-8. doi:10.1080/11038120701208158.
65. Parikh R, Horne H, Feinstein SJ, Anasti JN. Cervical length screening in patients who have undergone loop electrosurgical excision procedure. J Reprod Med 2008;53:909-13.
66. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, Tapper AM. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:504-10. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b052de.
67. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and subsequent risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a population-based study of singleton deliveries during a 9-year period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:33. e1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.004.
68. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK. Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1232-8. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bf1ef2.
69. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and risk for spontaneous preterm delivery in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:511-5. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b1377b.
70. Shanbhag S, Clark H, Timmaraju V, Bhattacharya S, Cruickshank M. Pregnancy outcome after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:727-35. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b5cba3.
71. Fischer RL, Sveinbjornsson G, Hansen C. Cervical sonography in pregnant women with a prior cone biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:613-7. doi:10.1002/uog.7682.
72. van de Vijver A, Poppe W, Verguts J, Arbyn M. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: a retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital. BJOG 2010;117:268-73. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02437.x.
73. Werner CL, Lo JY, Heffernan T, Griffith WF, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:605-8. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d068a3.
74. Andía D, Mozo de Rosales F, Villasante A, Rivero B, Díez J, Pérez C. Pregnancy outcome in patients treated with cervical conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;112:225-8. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.015.
75. Armarnik S, Sheiner E, Piura B, Meirovitz M, Zlotnik A, Levy A. Obstetric outcome following cervical conization. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;283:765-9. doi:10.1007/s00404-011-1848-3.
76. Lima AF, Francisco C, Júlio C, Paula T, Vitorino A, Borrego J. Obstetric outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: six years of experience. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2011;15:276-9. doi:10.1097/LGT.0b013e31821a6823.
77. Poon LC, Savvas M, Zamblera D, Skyfta E, Nicolaides KH. Large loop excision of transformation zone and cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. BJOG 2012;119:692-8. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03203.x.
78. Simoens C, Goffin F, Simon P, et al. Adverse obstetrical outcomes after treatment of precancerous cervical lesions: a Belgian multicentre study. BJOG 2012;119:1247-55. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03429.x.
79. Van Hentenryck M, Noel JC, Simon P. Obstetric and neonatal outcome after surgical treatment of cervical dysplasia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;162:16-20. doi:10.1016/j. ejogrb.2012.01.019.
80. Frega A, Sesti F, De Sanctis L, et al. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013;122:145-9. doi:10.1016/j. ijgo.2013.03.013.
81. Frey HA, Stout MJ, Odibo AO, et al. Risk of cesarean delivery after loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:39-45. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318278f904.
82. Guo HJ, Guo RX, Liu YL. Effects of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife conization on pregnancy outcomes. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2013;34:79-82.
83. Heinonen A, Gissler M, Riska A, Paavonen J, Tapper AM, Jakobsson M. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:1063-8. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828caa31.
84. Wuntakal R, Castanon A, Sasieni PD, Hollingworth A. Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a single NHS hospital. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013;23:710-5. doi:10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182885496.
85. Castanon A, Landy R, Brocklehurst P, et al. PaCT Study Group. Risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study. BMJ 2014;349:g6223. doi:10.1136/bmj.g6223.
86. Ciavattini A, Stortoni P, Mancioli F, Puglia D, Tranquilli AL, Liverani CA. The impact of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for CIN 2,3 on spontaneous preterm delivery in twin pregnancies by assisted reproductive technique: preliminary data. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:1169-71. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.850483.
87. Ehsanipoor RM, Jolley JA, Goldshore MA, et al. The relationship between previous treatment for cervical dysplasia and preterm delivery in twin gestations. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:821-4. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.836178.
88. Kitson SJ, Greig E, Michael E, Smith M. Predictive value of volume of cervical tissue removed during LLETZ on subsequent preterm delivery: a cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;180:51-5. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.06.011.
89. Sozen H, Namazov A, Cakir S, Akdemir Y, Vatansever D, Karateke A. Pregnancy outcomes after cold knife conization related to excised cone dimensions. A retrospective cohort study. J Reprod Med 2014;59:81-6.
90. Martyn FM, McAuliffe FM, Beggan C, Downey P, Flannelly G, Wingfield MB. Excisional treatments of the cervix and effect on subsequent fertility: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015;185:114-20. doi:10.1016/j. ejogrb.2014.12.004.
91. Stout MJ, Frey HA, Tuuli MG, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of vaginal infections during pregnancy: an observational study. BJOG 2015;122:545-51. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13252.
92. Kirn V, Geiger P, Riedel C, et al. Cervical conisation and the risk of preterm delivery: a retrospective matched pair analysis of a German cohort. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;291:599-603. doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3463-6.
93. Miller ES, Sakowicz A, Grobman WA. The association between cervical dysplasia, a short cervix, and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:543.e1-4. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.036.
94. Macvicar J, Willocks J. The effect of diathermy conization of the cervix on subsequent fertility, pregnancy and delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1968;75:355-6. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1968. tb02090.x.
95. Kullander S, Sjöberg NO. Treatment of carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri by conization. A five-year follow-up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1971;50:153-7. doi:10.3109/00016347109157302.
96. Grönroos M, Liukko P, Kilkku P, Punnonen R. Pregnancy and delivery after conization of the cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979;58:477-80. doi:10.3109/00016347909154071.
97. Leiman G, Harrison NA, Rubin A. Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: complications related to cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:14-8. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(80)90556-6.
98. Monaghan JM, Kirkup W, Davis JA, Edington PT. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopically directed cryosurgery and subsequent pregnancy experience. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982;89:387-92. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb05082.x.
99. Wakita K, Izumi T, Kuramoto H, Sasaki N, Shimada N. Pregnancy after laser therapy for the treatment of uterine cervical neoplasia. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1990;8:71-6.
100. Novikova EG, Antoshechkina MA. [Reproductive function after the organ-preserving treatment of early cancerous pathology of the cervix uteri]. Akush Ginekol (Mosk) 1994;2:44-7.
101. Mitsuhashi A, Sekiya S. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) during first trimester of pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000;71:237-9. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00173-3.
102. Althuisius SM, Schornagel IJ, Dekker GA, van Geijn HP, Hummel P. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the cervix and time of delivery in subsequent pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;72:31-4. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00326-X.
103. Berghella V, Pereira L, Gariepy A, Simonazzi G. Prior cone biopsy: prediction of preterm birth by cervical ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1393-7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.087.
104. Masamoto H, Nagai Y, Inamine M, et al. Outcome of pregnancy after laser conization: implications for infection as a causal link with preterm birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008;34:838-42. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00852.x.
105. Patrelli TS, Anfuso S, Vandi F, et al. Preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes after conization in 80 women. Preliminary data. Minerva Ginecol 2008;60:295-8.
106. Michelin MA, Merino LM, Franco CA, Murta EF. Pregnancy outcome after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2009;36:17-9.
107. Nam KH, Kwon JY, Kim YH, Park YW. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conization: risk factors for preterm delivery and the efficacy of prophylactic cerclage. J Gynecol Oncol 2010;21:225-9. doi:10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.225.
108. Radha Bai Prabhu T. Pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). J Obstet Gynaecol India 2010;60:149-51. doi:10.1007/s13224-010-0022-3.
109. Seki N, Kodama J, Kusumoto T, Nakamura K, Hongo A, Hiramatsu Y. Complications and obstetric outcomes after laser conization during pregnancy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2010;31:399-401.
110. Shin MY, Seo ES, Choi SJ, et al. The role of prophylactic cerclage in preventing preterm delivery after electrosurgical conization. J Gynecol Oncol 2010;21:230-6. doi:10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.230.
111. Khalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R, et al. The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity. BJOG 2012;119:685-91. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03252.x.
112. Berretta R, Gizzo S, Dall'Asta A, et al. Risk of preterm delivery associated with prior treatment of cervical precancerous lesion according to the depth of the cone. Dis Markers 2013;35:721-6. doi:10.1155/2013/686027.
113. Conner SN, Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, et al. Interval from loop electrosurgical excision procedure to pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1154-9. doi:10.1097/01. AOG.0000435454.31850.79.
114. Liu Y, Qiu HF, Tang Y, Chen J, Lv J. Pregnancy outcome after the treatment of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold-knife conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2014;77:240-4. doi:10.1159/000360538.
115. Rafaeli-Yehudai T, Kessous R, Aricha-Tamir B, et al. The effect of cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcomes in women following conization. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:1594-7. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.871254.
116. Sangkarat S, Ruengkhachorn I, Benjapibal M, Laiwejpithaya S, Wongthiraporn W, Rattanachaiyanont M. Long-term outcomes of a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a high incidence country. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:1035-9. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.2.1035.
117. Wongtiraporn W, Laiwejpithaya S, Sangkarat S, et al. Long term outcomes of laser conization for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Thai women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:7757-61. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.18.7757.
118. Kim M, Ishioka S, Endo T, Baba T, Saito T. Obstetrical prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after "coinshaped" conization. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;293:651-7. doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3860-5.
119. Anwar A, Igbenehi C, Lindow SW, Noor N, Musa S, Saha A. Pregnancy outcome after electrosurgical cervical cone biopsy using Fischer cone biopsy excisor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:477-81. doi:10.3109/14767058.2015.1006619.
120. Rosen A, Klein M, Vavra N, et al. [PAP IV in pregnancy-a retrospective multicenter study]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1991;51:208-10. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1023705.
121. Sljivancanin D, Kesić V, Tulić L, Dotlić J. [Assessment of the natural course and treatment of premalignant uterine cervical lesions in pregnancy]. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2013;141:192-7. doi:10.2298/SARH1304192S.
122. Ricciotti HA, Burke L, Kobelin M, Slomovic B, Ludmir J. Ultrasound evaluation of cervical shortening after loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;50:175-8. doi:10.1016/0020-7292(95)02432-C.
123. Gentry DJ, Baggish MS, Brady K, Walsh PM, Hungler MS. The effects of loop excision of the transformation zone on cervical length: implications for pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:516-20. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.104209.
124. Kalliala I, Anttila A, Dyba T, Hakulinen T, Halttunen M, Nieminen P. Pregnancy incidence and outcome among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2012;119:227-35. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03042.x.
125. Spracklen CN, Harland KK, Stegmann BJ, Saftlas AF. Cervical surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and prolonged time to conception of a live birth: a case-control study. BJOG 2013;120:960-5. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12209.
126. Ciavattini A, Clemente N, Delli Carpini G, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2015;103:1043-8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.112.
127. Naleway AL, Weinmann S, Krishnarajah G, et al. Pregnancy after treatment for cervical cancer precursor lesions in a retrospective matched cohort. PLoS One 2015;10:e0117525. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0117525.
128. Pils S, Eppel W, Seemann R, Natter C, Ott J. Sequential cervical length screening in pregnancies after loop excision of the transformation zone conisation: a retrospective analysis. BJOG 2014;121:457-62. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12390.
129. Pinborg A, Ortoft G, Loft A, Rasmussen SC, Ingerslev HJ. Cervical conization doubles the risk of preterm and very preterm birth in assisted reproductive technology twin pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2015;30:197-204. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu260.
130. Smaldone GM, Krohn MA, McGee EA. Cervical cancer and risk for delivery of small-for-gestational age neonates. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010;19:969-74. doi:10.1089/jwh.2009.1574.
131. Zuo Z, Goel S, Carter JE. Association of cervical cytology and HPV DNA status during pregnancy with placental abnormalities and preterm birth. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:260-5. doi:10.1309/AJCP93JMIUEKRPIW.
132. Al-Halal H, Kezouh A, Abenhaim HA. Incidence and obstetrical outcomes of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer in pregnancy: a population-based study on 8.8 million births. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;287:245-50. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2475-3.
133. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med 2009;3:e123-30.
134. http://www.crown-initiative.org/aims-and-scope
135. Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A, Dickinson HO. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;12:CD001318.
136. Strander B, Hällgren J, Sparén P. Effect of ageing on cervical or vaginal cancer in Swedish women previously treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study of long term incidence and mortality. BMJ 2014;348:f7361. doi:10.1136/bmj.f7361.
137. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Gondry J, Petry KU, Paraskevaidis E. Long term outcomes for women treated for cervical precancer. BMJ 2014;348:f7700. doi:10.1136/bmj.f7700.
138. Paraskevaidis E, Kyrgiou M, Martin-Hirsch P. Have we dismissed ablative treatment too soon in colposcopy practice? BJOG 2007;114:3-4. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01178.x.
139. Kindinger L, Teoh T. Preterm delivery - who is most at risk? An audit of a preterm surveillance clinic. BJOG 2013;120(Supplement 3):50.
140. Kindinger L, Kyrgiou M, MacIntyre D, et al. Pregnancy outcome after cervical treatment for CIN: management of the risk of preterm delivery by ultrasound measurement of cervical length and targeted cervical cerclage. PLoS One [forthcoming].