Cervical cancer and risk for delivery of small-for-gestational age neonates

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 969-974

  Smaldone, Gina M Mantia ^a,b   Krohn, Marijane A ^a   McGee, Elizabeth A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;

ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; MIDDLE AGED; PENNSYLVANIA; REGISTRIES; RISK; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77952405832     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1574     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer 2001;37(Suppl 8):S4-66.
2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:43-66.
3. National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program. Accessed November 1, 2009. Available from: http:==www.seer. cancer.gov=statfacts=html=cervix.html
4. Duggan B, Muderspach LI, Roman LD, Curtin JP, d'Ablaing G 3rd, Morrow CP. Cervical cancer in pregnancy: Reporting on planned delay in therapy. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:598-602.
5. Segnan N. Socioeconomic status and cancer screening. IARC Sci Publ 1997:369-376.
6. Committee on Practice B-G. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas, number 35. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:855-867.
7. Covens A, Shaw P, Murphy J, et al. Is radical trachelectomy a safe alternative to radical hysterectomy for patients with stage IA-B carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer 1999;86:2273-2279.
8. Dargent D, Martin X, Sacchetoni A, Mathevet P. Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: A treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer 2000;88:1877-1882.
9. Schorge JO, Lee KR, Sheets EE. Prospective management of stage IA(1) cervical adenocarcinoma by conization alone to preserve fertility: A preliminary report. Gynecol Oncol 2000;78:217-220.
10. Martin-Hirsch PL, Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener H. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001318, 2000.
11. 2 laser conisation of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:717-720.
12. Kasum M, Kuvacic I. [Pregnancy outcome after conization.] Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol 1991;31:31-34.
13. Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Kristensen FB. Increased risk of preterm birth in women with cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:1005-1008.
14. Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Lolis E, Papanikou E, Malamou-Mitsi V, Agnantis NJ. Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage IA1) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002;86:10-13.
15. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Luscher KP. Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: Influence of cone height. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:978-982.
16. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 2004;291:2100-2106.
17. Samson SL, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, McKay DJ, Gill GH. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:325-332.
18. Tan L, Pepra E, Haloob RK. The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;24:25-27.
19. van Rooijen M, Persson E. Pregnancy outcome after laser vaporization of the cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78:346-348.
20. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367:489-498.
21. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta- analysis. BMJ 2008;337:a1284.
22. Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Himes JH. 1994-1996 U.S. singleton birth weight percentiles for gestational age by race, Hispanic origin, and gender. Matern Child Health J 1999;3:225-231.
23. Fossa SD, Magelssen H, Melve K, Jacobsen AB, Langmark F, Skjaerven R. Parenthood in survivors after adulthood cancer and perinatal health in their offspring: A preliminary report. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005:77-82.
24. Green DM, Whitton JA, Stovall M, et al. Pregnancy outcome of female survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1070-1080. (Pubitemid 35178413)
25. Barker DJ, Osmond C, Simmonds SJ, Wield GA. The relation of small head circumference and thinness at birth to death from cardiovascular disease in adult life. BMJ 1993;306:422-426.
26. Fattal-Valevski A, Leitner Y, Kutai M, et al. Neurodevelop-mental outcome in children with intrauterine growth retardation: A 3-year follow-up. J Child Neurol 1999;14:724-727.
27. Williams RL, Creasy RK, Cunningham GC, Hawes WE, Norris FD, Tashiro M. Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstet Gynecol 1982;59:624-632.
28. Mari G, Hanif F. Intrauterine growth restriction: How to manage and when to deliver. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007;50: 497-509.
29. Sheu BC, Chang WC, Lin HH, Chow SN, Huang SC. Immune concept of human papillomaviruses and related antigens in local cancer milieu of human cervical neoplasia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2007;33:103-113.
30. Althabe O, Labarrere C, Telenta M. Maternal vascular lesions in placentae of small-for-gestational-age infants. Placenta 1985;6:265-276.
31. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719-748.
32. Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: Methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull WHO 1987;65:663-737.
33. Plummer M, Herrero R, Franceschi S, et al. Smoking and cervical cancer: Pooled analysis of the IARC multi-centric case-control study. Cancer Causes Control 2003;14:805-814.