Pregnancy outcome after electrosurgical cervical cone biopsy using Fischer cone biopsy excisor

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 477-481

  Anwar, Ayesha ^a   Igbenehi, Caleb ^b   Lindow, Stephen W ^c   Noor, Naheed ^b   Musa, Siti ^b   Saha, Arabinda ^b  

^a HULL AND EAST YORKSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b DIANA PRINCESS OF WALES HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c SIDRA MEDICAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Qatar)

Author keywords

Electrosurgical cone biopsy of cervix; preterm delivery; preterm labour

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CERVICAL CONE BIOPSY; CERVICAL LENGTH MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; FETUS OUTCOME; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; FISCHER CONE BIOPSY EXCISOR; GENERAL HOSPITAL; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNCH BIOPSY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TREATMENT INDICATION; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CERCLAGE; ADOLESCENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; OBSTETRIC LABOR, PREMATURE; PREGNANCY; SURGERY; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CERVIX UTERI; CONIZATION; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; HUMANS; OBSTETRIC LABOR, PREMATURE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84952639433     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1006619     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J, et al.; European Commission. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. 2nd ed. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2008: 1-291
2. Arbyn M, Rebolj M, De Kok IM, et al. Challenges for organising cervical screening programmes in the 15 old member states of the European Union. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 2714-21
3. Jordan J, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, et al. European guidelines for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 2. Cytopathology 2009; 20: 5-16
4. Hallam NF, West J, Harper C, et al. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) as an alternative to both local ablative and cone biopsy treatment: a series of 1000 patients. J Gynecol Surg 1993; 9: 77-82
5. Bentley J. Colposcopic management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012; 34: 1188-1202
6. Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bösze P, et al. Poscopic terminology of the international federation for cervical pathology and colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 166-72
7. Fischer NR, Alexandarian D, Gagliardi S, et al. Evaluation of the cone biopsy excisor compared with the large loop for electrosurgical excision of cervical lesions. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns 1998; 5: 161-2
8. Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener HC, Miller ID, et al. A population-based study of micro invasive disease of the cervix- A colposcopic and cytologic analysis. Gynecol Oncol 1992; 45: 9-12
9. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ 2008; 337: a1284
10. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and subsequent risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a population-based study of singleton deliveries during a 9-year period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 33.e1-6
11. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, Tapper AM. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 504-10
12. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006; 367: 489-98
13. Khalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R, et al. The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity. BJOG 2012; 119: 685-91
14. Ørtoft G, Henriksen T, Hansen E, Petersen L. After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy. BJOG 2010; 117: 258-67
15. Kristensen J, Langhoff-Ross J, Borlum-Kristensen F. Increased risk of preterm birth in women with cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 1000-8
16. Nohr B, Tabor A, Frederiksen K, Kjaer S. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 596-603
17. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, et al. Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: influence of cone height. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 978-82
18. Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen S, et al. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 272: 109-12
19. Svare J, Andersen L, Langhoff-Roos J, et al. The relationship between prior cervical conization, cervical microbial colonization and preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992; 47: 41-5
20. Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, et al. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 933-8