Obstetrical prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after “coin-shaped” conization

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 293, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 651-657

  Kim, Miseon ^a   Ishioka, Shinichi ^a   Endo, Toshiaki ^a   Baba, Tsuyoshi ^a   Saito, Tsuyoshi ^a  

^a SAPPORO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); CO2 laser therapy; Obstetrical and oncological outcomes; Preterm delivery

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SURGERY; CERVICAL LENGTH MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL FEATURE; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LASER SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; ADOLESCENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CANCER STAGING; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; GAS LASER; LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY; PATHOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; THERAPEUTIC USE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CONIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LASER THERAPY; LASERS, GAS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84958778963     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: 14320711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3860-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Govindappagari S, Schivone MB, Wright JD (2011) Cervical neoplasia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54:528–536
2. Hamashima C, Aoki D, Miyagi E, Saito E, Nakayama T, Sagawa M, Saito H, Sobue T (2010) Japanese Research Group for Development of Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines. The Japanese guideline for cervical cancer screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:485–502
3. Matsumoto K, Yoshikawa H (2013) Human papillomavirus infection and the risk of cervical cancer in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39:7–17
4. Bruinsma FJ, Quinn MA (2011) The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 118:1031–1041
5. Bevis K, Biggio J (2011) Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:19–27
6. Masamoto H, Nagai Y, Inamine M, Hirakawa M, Okubo E, Ishisoko A, Sakumoto K, Aoki Y (2008) Outcome of pregnancy after laser conization: implications for infection as a casual link with preterm birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34:838–842
7. Takagi K, Satoh T, Multicentre Premature Labour Study Group (2009) Is long-term tocolysis effective for threatened premature labour? J Int Med Res 37:227–239
8. Yaju Y, Nakayama T (2006) Effectiveness and safety of ritodrine hydrochloride for the treatment of preterm labour: a systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 15:813–822
9. Kim HJ, Kim KR, Mok JE, Nam JH, Kim YT, Kim YM, Kim JH, Yun SC (2007) Pathologic risk factors for predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP conization. Gynecol Oncol 105:434–438
10. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L (2004) Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 291:2100–2106
11. Jolley JA, Wing DA (2008) Pregnancy management after cervical surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 20:528–533
12. Leiman G, Harrison NA, Rubin A (1980) Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: complications related to cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136:14–18
13. Larsson G, Grundsell H, Gullberg B, Svennerud S (1982) Outcome of pregnancy after conization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 61:461–466
14. Zeisler H, Joura EA, Bancher-Todesca D, Hanzal E, Gitsch G (1997) Prophylactic cerclage in pregnancy. Effect in women with a history of conization. J Reprod Med 42:390–392
15. Shin MY, Seo ES, Choi SJ, Oh SY, Kim BG, Bae DS, Kim JH, Roh CR (2010) The role of prophylactic cerclage in preventing preterm delivery after electrosurgical conization. J Gynecol Oncol 21:230–236
16. Robichaux AG 3rd, Stedman CM, Hamer C (1990) Uterine activity in patients with cervical cerclage. Obstet Gynecol 76(1 Suppl):63S–66S
17. Charles D, Edwards WR (1981) Infectious complications of cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141:10651071
18. Takada S, Ishioka S, Endo T, Baba T, Morishita M, Akashi Y, Mizuuchi M, Adachi H, Kim M, Saito T (2013) Difficulty in the management of pregnancy after vaginal radical trachelectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 18:1085–1090
19. Kim M, Ishioka SI, Endo T, Baba T, Akashi Y, Morishita M, Adachi H, Saito T (2014) Importance of uterine cervical cerclage to maintain a successful pregnancy for patients who undergo vaginal radical trachelectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 2014(19):906–911
20. Grimm C, Brammen L, Sliutz G, Weigert M, Sevelda P, Pils S, Reinthaller A, Polterauer S (2013) Impact of conization type on the resected cone volume: results of a retrospective multi-center study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288:1081–1086
21. van de Vijver A, Poppe W, Verguts J, Arbyn M (2010) Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: a retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital. BJOG 117:268–273
22. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E (2006) Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 367:489–498
23. Wu YM, Wang T, He Y, Song F, Wang Y, Zhu L, Kong WM, Duan W, Zhang WY (2014) Clinical management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pregnant and postpartum women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:1071–1077
24. Soutter WP, Haidopoulos D, Gornall RJ, McIndoe GA, Fox J, Mason WP, Flanagan A, Nicholas N, Barker F, Abrahams J, Lampert I, Sarhanis P (2001) Is conservative treatment for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix safe? BJOG 108:1184–1189
25. Barretta R, Gizzo S, Dall’Asta A, Mazzone E, Monica M, Franchi L, Peri F, Patrelli TS, Bacchi Modena A (2013) Risk of preterm delivery associated with prior treatment of cervical precancerous lesion according to the depth of the cone. Dis Markers 35:721–726
26. Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcone T, Franco E (1995) The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: north American experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:1246–1250