Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 70-80

  Bruinsma, F ^a   Lumley, J ^a   Tan, J ^b   Quinn, M ^b  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cervical dysplasia; Precancerous changes in the cervix; Preterm birth

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INDUCED ABORTION; LASER SURGERY; PRECANCER; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE;

ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; ELECTROCOAGULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LASER SURGERY; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PREGNANCY; PREMATURE BIRTH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL DYSPLASIA; VICTORIA;

EID: 33845543490     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01107.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cervical Screening in Australia 2001-2002. AIHW Cat No. 22. Report No.: Cancer Series No. 27. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2004.
2. National Health Service. Cervical Screening Programme, England: 2004-2005. Report No.: 2005/09/HSCIC. Health and Social Care Information Service, Leeds, UK: Government Statistical Service, 2005.
3. Cox J. Epidemiology of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus. In: Jones HW III, editor. Bailliere's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. London: Bailliere Tindall; 1995. pp 1-37.
4. Miller N, Todd O. Conization of the cervix. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1938;67:265-70.
5. Larsson G, Grundsell H, Gullberg B, Svennerud S. Outcome of pregnancy after conization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982;61:461-6.
6. Leiman G, Harrison N, Rubin A. Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: complications related to cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:14-18.
7. Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE. The outcome of pregnancy after CO2 laser conisation of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:717-20.
8. Boyd J, Royle D, Fidler H, Boyes D. Conservative management of in situ carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963;85:322-7.
9. Anderson M, Horwell D, Broby Z. Outcome of pregnancy after laser vaporization conization. Colp Gynecol Laser Surg 1984;1:35-40.
10. Buller RE, Jones HW III. Pregnancy following cervical conization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:506-12.
11. Haffenden DK, Bigrigg A, Codling BW, Read MD. Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:1059-60.
12. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intra-epithelial or early invasive lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Lancet 2006;367:489-98.
13. El-Bastawissi AY, Becker TM, Daling JR. Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:207-12.
14. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 2004;291:2100-6.
15. Samson S, Bentley J, Fahey T, McKay D, Gill G. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:325-32.
16. Lumley J. The epidemiology of preterm birth. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1993;7:477-98.
17. Tucker J, McGuire W. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Br Med J 2004;329:675-8.
18. Riley M, Halliday J. Births in Victoria 1999-2000. Melbourne, Australia: Perinatal Data Collection Unit, Department of Human Services, 2001.
19. Riley M, Griffin O. Validating a state-wide data collection: differences in information technology resources between hospitals. Health Inf Manage 1997;27:67-8.
20. AUTOMATCH Generalised Record Linkage System, 4th edn. Burtonsville, MD: Match Ware Technologies Inc., 1996.
21. Victorian Perinatal Data Collection Unit. Notifiers' Guide for the Completion of the Perinatal Morbidity Statistics Form. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Government, Department of Human Services, 1999.
22. Yu V, Wood E. Prematurity. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1987.
23. Wilhelm J, Morris D, Hotham N. Epilepsy and pregnancy - a review of 98 pregnancies. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;30:290-5.
24. Mourad J, Elliott J, Erickson L, Lisboa L. Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1027-9.
25. Bakketeig L, Hoffman H. Epidemiology of preterm births; results from a longitudinal study of births in Norway. In: Elder M, Hendricks C, editors. Preterm Labour. London: Butterworth; 1981. pp. 17-46.
26. Committee to Study the Prevention of Low Birth Weight DoHPaDP, Institute of Medicine. Preventing Low Birth Weight. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985.
27. Sorensen T, Dempsey J, Xiao R, Frederick I, Luthy D, Williams M. Maternal asthma and risk of preterm delivery. Ann Epidemiol 2003;13:267-72.
28. McGovern P, Llorens A, Skurnick J, Weiss G, Goldsmith L. Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer or gamete intrafallopian transfer: a metaanalysis. Fertil Steril 2001;82:1514-20.
29. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software, Release 8.0 ed. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 2003.
30. Last J. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
31. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
32. Spitzer M, Herman J, Krumholz B, Lesser M. The fertility of women after cervical laser surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:504-8.
33. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Luscher KP. Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: influence of cone height. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:978-82.
34. van Rooijen M, Persson E. Pregnancy outcome after laser vaporization of the cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:346-8.
35. Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Wittrup M, Bock JE. Cervical conization and preterm delivery/low birth weight. A systematic review of the literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:640-4.
36. Jones JM, Sweetnam P, Hibbard BM. The outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy of the cervix: a case-control study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979;86:913-6.
37. Ludviksson K, Sandstrom B. Outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy - a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1982;14:135-42.
38. Kuoppala T, Saarikoski S. Pregnancy and delivery after cone biopsy of the cervix. Arch Gynecol 1986;237:149-54.
39. Kristensen GB. The outcome of pregnancy and preterm delivery after conization of the cervix. Arch Gynecol 1985;236:127-30.
40. Crane J. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1058-62.
41. Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Lois E, Papanikou E, Malamou-Mitsi V, Agnantis NJ. Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for micro-invasive (FIGO Stage IA1) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002;86:10-13.
42. Klebanoff M, Shiono P. Top down, bottom up and inside out: reflections on preterm birth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1995;9:125-9.
43. Pickett K, Abrams B, Selvin S. Defining preterm delivery - the epidemiology of clinical presentation. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000;14:305-8.
44. Berkowitz G, Blackmore-Prince C, Lapinski R, Savitz D. Risk factors for preterm birth subtypes. Epidemiology 1998;9:279-85.
45. Robertson H. Poor knowledge and misunderstandings: perinatal data validity and work place change in midwifery. Int J Qual Health Care 1995;7:391-7.
46. Morken N-H, Kallen K, Hagberg H, Jacobsson B. Preterm birth in Sweden 1973-2001: rate, subgroups, and effect of changing patterns in multiple births, maternal age, and smoking. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:558-65.
47. McCracken K. Into a SEIFA SES cul-de-sac. Aust N Z J Public Health 2001;25:305-6.
48. Walker A, Becker N. Health inequalities across socio-economic groups: comparing geographic area-based and individual-based indicators. Public Health 2005;119:1097-104.
49. Taylor R, Mamoon H, Morrell S, Wain G. Cervical screening by socioeconomic status in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2001;25:256-60.
50. Sagot P, Caroit Y, Winer N, Lopes P, Boog G. Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conisation of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995;58:53-8.