Long term outcomes of laser conization for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Thai women

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Volumn 15, Issue 18, 2014, Pages 7757-7761

  Wongtiraporn, Weerasak ^a   Laiwejpithaya, Somsak ^a   Sangkarat, Suthi ^a   Benjapibal, Mongkol ^a   Rattanachaiyanont, Manee ^a   Ruengkhachorn, Irene ^a   Chaopotong, Pattama ^a   Laiwejpithaya, Sujera ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Laser conization; Long term outcomes; Thailand

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CANCER GRADING; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THAILAND; TUMOR INVASION; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; CONIZATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LASER THERAPY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THAILAND; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84908054683     PISSN: 15137368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.18.7757     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bar-Am A, Daniel Y, Ron IG, et al (2000). Combined colposcopy, loop conization and laser vaporization reduces recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease in cervical dysplasia. Gynecol Oncol, 78, 47-51.
2. Baser E, Ozgu E, Erkilinc S, et al (2013). Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 14, 6693-6.
3. Bekassy Z (1997). Long-term follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated with minimal conization by carbondioxide laser. Lasers Surg Med, 20, 461-6.
4. Dorsey JH, Diggs ES (1979). Microsurgical conization of the cervix by carbondioxide laser. Obstet Gynecol, 54, 565-70.
5. Duggan BD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, et al (1999). Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 180, 276-82.
6. Forsmo S, Hansen MH, Jacobsen BK, Qian P (1996). Pregnancy outcome after laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 75, 139-43.
7. Khuhaprema T, Attasara P, Sriplung H, et al (2012). Cancer in Thailand. Vol. VI, 2004-2006. Bangkok, National Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Service, Ministry of Public Health.
8. Laiwejpithaya S, Rattanachaiyanont M, Benjapibal M, et al (2008). Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split sample study. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 9, 575-80.
9. Lu CH, Liu FS, Kuo CJ, et al (2006). Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III. Obstet Gynecol, 107, 830-5.
10. Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, Beau G (1994). A randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife cone, laser and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol, 54, 175-9.
11. Miller NF, Todd OE (1938). Conization of the cervix. Surg Gyncol Obstet, 67, 265-70.
12. Mitchell MF, Schottenfeld D, Tortolero-Luna G, et al (1998). Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesion: a meta analysis. Obstet Gynecol, 91, 626-31.
13. Moss EL, Dhar KK, Byrom J, Jones PW, Redman CW (2009). The diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy in previously treated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 13, 5-9.
14. Oyesanya OA, Amerazinghe C, Manning EA (1993). A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy. Gyneol Oncol, 50, 84-8.
15. Paraskevaidis E, Lolis ED, Koliopoulos G, et al (2000). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after large loop excision with clear margins. Obstet Gynecol, 95, 828-31.
16. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, et al (1997). Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: influence of cone height. Obstet Gynecol, 90, 978-82.
17. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, et al (2004). Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA, 291, 2100-6.
18. Sagot P, Caroit Y, Winer et al (1995). Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conisation of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 58, 53-8.
19. Sjoborg KD, Vistad I, Myhr SS, et al (2007). Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case control study. Acta obstet Gynecol, 86, 423-8.
20. Skjeldestad FE, Hagen B, Lie AK, Isaksen C (1997). Residual and recurrent disease after laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol, 90, 428-33.
21. Ueda M, Ueki K, Kanemura M, et al (2006). Diagnostic and therapeutic laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol, 101, 143-6.
22. Ueki M, Okamoto Y, Misaki O, et al (1994). Conservative therapy for microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol, 53, 109-13.
23. Wuntakal R, Castanon A, Sasieni PD, Hollingworth A (2013). Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a Single NHS Hospital. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 23, 710-5.