Long term outcomes for women treated for cervical precancer

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 348, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Arbyn, M ^a   Kyrgiou, M ^b   Gondry, J ^c   Petry, K U ^d   Paraskevaidis, E ^e  

^a SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Belgium)

^b QUEEN CHARLOTTE S AND CHELSEA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d Klinikum Wolfsburg   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER GRADING; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER RISK; CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY; CANCER THERAPY; CERVICAL PRECANCER; DNA DETERMINATION; EDITORIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84892723904     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f7700     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Soutter WP, Sasieni P, Panoskaltsis T. Long-term risk of invasive cervical cancer after treatment of squamous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer 2005;118:2048-55.
2. Strander B, Hällgren J, Sparén P. Effect of ageing on cervical or vaginal cancer in Swedish women previously treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study of long term incidence and mortality. BMJ 2014;348:f7361.
3. Flannelly G, Bolger B, Fawzi H, De Lopes AB, Monaghan JM. Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence? BJOG 2001;108:1025-30. (Pubitemid 32971734)
4. Ang C, Mukhopadhyay A, Burnley C, Faulkner K, Cross PA, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Histological recurrence and depth of loop treatment of the cervix in women of reproductive age: incomplete excision versus adverse pregnancy outcome. BJOG 2011;118:685-92.
5. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ 2008;337:a1284.
6. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intra-epithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Lancet 2006;367:489-98. (Pubitemid 43208905)
7. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK. Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1232-8.
8. Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Thoresen S, Irgens LM, Iversen OE. Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study. BMJ 2008;337:a1343.
9. Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, Meijer CJLM, Poljak M, Ogilvie G, et al. Evidence regarding HPV testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine 2012;30(suppl 5):F88-99.
10. Kocken M, Helmerhorst TJ, Berkhof J, Louwers JA, Nobbenhuis MA, Bais AG, et al. Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:441-50.
11. Arbyn M, Simoens C, Goffin F, Noehr B, Bruinsma F. Treatment of cervical cancer precursors: influence of age, completeness of excision and cone depth on therapeutic failure, and on adverse obstetric outcomes. BJOG 2011;118:1274-5.
12. Castanon A, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, Peebles D, Singh N, Walker P et al. Risk of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women attending colposcopy in England: retrospective-prospective cohort study. BMJ 2012;345:e5174.