The impact of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for CIN 2,3 on spontaneous preterm delivery in twin pregnancies by assisted reproductive technique: Preliminary data

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1169-1171

  Ciavattini, Andrea ^a   Stortoni, Piergiorgio ^a   Mancioli, Francesca ^a   Puglia, Danila ^b   Tranquilli, Andrea Luigi ^a   Liverani, Carlo Antonio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Assisted reproduction techniques; Cervical treatment; Loop electrosurgical excision procedure; Preterm delivery; Twin pregnancies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; GESTATION PERIOD; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TWIN PREGNANCY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; NEWBORN; PATHOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, NEOPLASTIC; PREMATURE BIRTH; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INFANT, NEWBORN; PILOT PROJECTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, NEOPLASTIC; PREGNANCY, TWIN; PREMATURE BIRTH; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84902971632     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.850483     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Insinga RP, Glass AG, Rush BB. Diagnoses and outcomes in cervical cancer screening: A population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:105-13. (Pubitemid 39077962
2. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: Systematic review and meta-AnalysiS Lancet 2006;367:489-98. (Pubitemid 43208905
3. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Meta-AnalysiS Br Med J 2008; 337:1-11. Review
4. Werner CL, Lo JY, Heffernan T, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115: 605-8
5. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, et al. Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114: 1232-8
6. D'Addato AV. Secular trends in twinning rateS J Biosoc Sci 2007; 39:147-51. (Pubitemid 46648333
7. Moini A, Shiva M, Arabipoor A, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology compared with twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously: A prospective follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;165:29-32
8. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and risk for spontaneous preterm delivery in twin pregnancieS Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:511-5
9. Giuffrè M, Piro E, Corsello G. Prematurity and twinning. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:6-10
10. Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: A systematic review of controlled studieS Br Med J 2004;328:261-5
11. Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, et al. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 2002;346:731-7. (Pubitemid 34983993
12. Armarnik S, Sheiner E, Piura B, et al. Obstetric outcome following cervical conization. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;283:765-9