Pregnancy outcome after the treatment of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold-knife conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 240-244

  Liu, Yi ^a   Qiu, Hai Fan ^a   Tang, Yunbing ^a   Chen, Jie ^a   Lv, Jieqiang ^a  

^a WENZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cold knife conization; Loop electrosurgical excision procedure; Pregnancy outcome

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN; PROSTAGLANDIN;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COLD KNIFE CONIZATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FOLLOW UP; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARRIAGE; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE FETUS MEMBRANE RUPTURE; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; WEIGHT GAIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE FERTILITY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; DEVICES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CONIZATION; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84903748412     PISSN: 03787346     EISSN: 1423002X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000360538     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ramondetta L: What is the appropriate approach to treating women with incurable cervical cancer? J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2013; 11:348-355.
2. Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J, Ronco G, Schenck U, Segnan N, et al: European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening, ed 2: summary document. Ann Oncol 2010;21: 448-458.
3. Arbyn M, Rebolj M, De Kok IM, Becker N, O'Reilly M, Andrae B: Challenges for organising cervical screening programmes in the 15 old member states of the European Union. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:2714-2721.
4. Jin G, Lanlan Z, Li C, Dan Z: Pregnancy outcome following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289:85-99.
5. Ortoft G, Henriksen T, Harisen E, Petersen L: After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy. BJOG 2010; 117:258-267.
6. Klaritsch P, Reich O, Giuliani A, Tamussino K, Haas J, Winter R: Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103:604-607. (Pubitemid 44604495)
7. Michelin MA, Merino LM, Franco CA, Murta EF: Pregnancy outcome after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold-knife conization. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2009; 36:17-19.
8. Guo HJ, Guo RX, Liu YL: Effects of loop elec-trosurgical excision procedure or cold-knife conization on pregnancy outcomes. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2013; 34:79-82.
9. Siegler E, Bornstein J: Israeli Colposcopy Network Loop electrosurgical excision procedures in Israel. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2011; 72: 85-89.
10. Bruinsma F, Lumley J, Tan J, Quinn M: Pre-cancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth. BJOG 2007; 114: 70-80. (Pubitemid 44923935)
11. Duggan BD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Geb-hardt JA, Groshen S, Morrow CP, et al: Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study. Am J Obstet Gy-necol 1999; 180:276-282. (Pubitemid 29093853)
12. Papoutsis D, Rodolakis A, Mesogitis S, Soti-ropoulou M, Antsaklis A: Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical in-traepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2013; 75:163-168.
13. Boonlikit S, Yanaranop M: Thermal artifact after three techniques of loop excision of the transformation zone: a comparative study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2012; 73:230-235.
14. Kristensen J, Langhoff-Ross J, Borlum-Kris-tensen F: Increased risk of preterm birth in women with cervical conization. Obstet Gy-necol 1993; 81:1000-1008.
15. Xue-jie Z, Yun-fei Z, Xue-qiong Z, Jia-na M, Bo-zhong X: The effect of loop electrosurgical excision on pregnancy during and mode of delivery. J Pract Obstet Gynecol 2008; 24:109.
16. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, Tapper AM: Long-term mortality in women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BJOG 2009; 116:838-844.
17. Himes KP, Simhan HN: Time from cervical conization to pregnancy and preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:314-319. (Pubitemid 46197422)
18. Fischer RL, Sveinbjornsson G, Hansen C: Cervical sonography in pregnant women with a prior cone biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36:613-617.
19. Ricciotti HA, Burke L, Kobelin M, Slomovic B, Ludmir J: Ultrasound evaluation of cervical shortening after loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995; 50:175-178.
20. Mazouni C, Bretelle F, Blanc K, Heckenroth H, Haddad O, Agostini A, et al: Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of cervix length after cervical conization. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:1483-1486. (Pubitemid 41619037)
21. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, et al: Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 2004; 291:2100-2106. (Pubitemid 38580153)
22. He HJ, Pan LY, Huang HF, Lang JH: Clinical analysis of the effect of cervical conization on fertility and pregnancy outcome. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2007; 42:515-517.
23. Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, Dargent D: Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Eur J Obstet Gy-necol Reprod Biol 2003; 106:214-218. (Pubitemid 36120474)