The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 118, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1031-1041

  Bruinsma, F J ^a   Quinn, M A ^b  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Precancerous changes in the cervix; preterm birth

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CANCER SURGERY; COLD KNIFE CONIZATION; CRYOSURGERY; ELECTROCOAGULATION; EXCISION; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE TRANSFORMATION ZONE; LASER SURGERY; LASER VAPORIZATION; LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE; META ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION;

BIOPSY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CERVIX UTERI; CONIZATION; CRYOSURGERY; CRYOTHERAPY; ELECTROCOAGULATION; FEMALE; FETAL MEMBRANES, PREMATURE RUPTURE; HUMANS; LASER THERAPY; OBSTETRIC LABOR, PREMATURE; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PREGNANCY; PREMATURE BIRTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 79960381178     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02944.x     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Wittrup M, Bock JE,. Cervical conization and preterm delivery/low birth weight: a systematic review of the literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993; 72: 640-4. (Pubitemid 23359460)
2. Crane J,. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 1058-62. (Pubitemid 37419997)
3. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E,. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intra-epithelial or early invasive lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Lancet 2006; 367: 489-98. (Pubitemid 43208905)
4. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu A, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al., Peri-natal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a meta-analysis. BMJ 2008; 337: a1284.
5. Sadler L, Saftlas A,. Cervical surgery and preterm birth. J Perinat Med 2007; 35: 5-9.
6. Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Thorensen S, Irgens L, Iversen O,. Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation. BMJ 2008; 337: a1343.
7. Bruinsma F, Lumley J, Tan J, Quinn M,. Pre-cancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth. BJOG 2007; 114: 70-80. (Pubitemid 44923935)
8. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, Tapper A-M,. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 504-10.
9. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Sainio S, Paavonen J, Tapper M-A,. Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepitheial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 309-13. (Pubitemid 46197421)
10. Klaritsch P, Reich O, Giuliani A, Tamussino K, Haas J, Winter R,. Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103: 604-7. (Pubitemid 44604495)
11. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer S,. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and subsequent risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a population-based study of singleton deliveries during a 9-year period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 33.
12. Nøhr B, Tabor A, Frederiksen K, Kjaer S,. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 596-603. (Pubitemid 46676312)
13. Shanbhag S, Clark H, Timmaraju V, Bhattacharya S, Cruickshank M,. Pregnancy outcome after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 727-35.
14. Sjoborg KD, Vistad I, Myhr SS, Svenningsen R, Herzog C, Kloster-Jensen A, et al., Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 423-8. (Pubitemid 46747718)
15. Spitzer M, Herman J, Krumholz B, Lesser M,. The fertility of women after cervical laser surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 504-8.
16. Higgins J, Green S,. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008] ed: the cochrane collaboration. Last accessed 21 April 2010.
17. Khan K, Ter Riet G, Popay J, Nixon J, Kleijnen J,. Stage II. Conducting the Review. Phase 5-Study Quality Assessment. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness: CRD's Guidance for Those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews, 2nd edn. York, UK: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2001.
18. Andersen ES,. Laser conization in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. J Gynecol Surg 2000; 16: 1-23. (Pubitemid 30414553)
19. Anderson M, Horwell D, Broby Z,. Outcome of pregnancy after laser vaporization conization. Colp Gynecol Laser Surg 1984; 1: 35-40. (Pubitemid 15178197)
20. Braet P, Peel J, Fenton D,. A case controlled study of the outcome of pregnancy following loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone. J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 14: 79-82. (Pubitemid 24132629)
21. Cruickshank ME, Flannelly G, Campbell DM, Kitchener HC,. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 467-70.
22. El-Bastawissi AY, Becker TM, Daling JR,. Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 207-12. (Pubitemid 29068094)
23. Gunasekera P, Lewis B, Phipps J,. Obstetric outcome after cervcial surgery for intra-epithelial neoplasia. J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 12: 291-3.
24. 2 laser conisation of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 717-20. (Pubitemid 23252558)
25. Hemmingsson E,. Outcome of third trimester pregnancies after cryotherapy of the uterine cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 675-7. (Pubitemid 12039932)
26. Jones JM, Sweetnam P, Hibbard BM,. The outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy of the cervix: a case-control study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979; 86: 913-6. (Pubitemid 10209338)
27. Kristensen GB,. The outcome of pregnancy and preterm delivery after conization of the cervix. Arch Gynecol 1985; 236: 127-30.
28. Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Kristensen FB,. Increased risk of preterm birth in women with cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 1005-8. (Pubitemid 23168749)
29. Kuoppala T, Saarikoski S,. Pregnancy and delivery after cone biopsy of the cervix. Arch Gynecol 1986; 237: 149-54. (Pubitemid 16160225)
30. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Luscher KP,. Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: influence of cone height. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 978-82. (Pubitemid 27510141)
31. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L,. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of pretem delivery. JAMA 2004; 291: 2100-6. (Pubitemid 38580153)
32. Saunders N, Fenton D, Soutter W, Brown V, Sharp F, Abernethy F,. A case-controlled study of the outcome of pregnancy following laser vapourization cone of the cervix. In:, Sharp F, Jordan JA, editors. Gynecologic Laser Surgery Proceedings of the Fifteenth Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine (VI). Ithaca, NY: Perinatology Press; 1986. pp. 121-5.
33. Tan L, Pepra E, Haloob R,. The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 24: 25-7. (Pubitemid 38130325)
34. Van Rooijen M, Persson E,. Pregnancy outcome after laser vaporization of the cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 346-8. (Pubitemid 29151599)
35. Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen S, Sorheim N, Jacobsen BK, Maltau J,. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 272: 109-12. (Pubitemid 40941743)
36. Crane J, Delaney T, Hutchens D,. Tranvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 37-44.
37. Himes K, Simhan H,. Time from cervical conization to pregnancy and preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 314-9. (Pubitemid 46197422)
38. Samson S, Bentley J, Fahey T, McKay D, Gill G,. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 325-32. (Pubitemid 40229450)
39. Bruinsma F,. Risk of Preterm Birth following Treatment for Pre-cancerous Changes in the Cervix. Melbourne: La Trobe University, 2009.
40. Bekassy Z, Losif CS,. Laser 'miniconisation' and the outcome of subsequent pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1996; 258: 75-9. (Pubitemid 26105805)
41. Blomfield PI, Buxton J, Dunn J, Luesley DM,. Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 620-5. (Pubitemid 23290180)
42. Buller RE, Jones HW III,. Pregnancy following cervical conization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 506-12. (Pubitemid 12192132)
43. Larsson G, Grundsell H, Gullberg B, Svennerud S,. Outcome of pregnancy after conization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61: 461-6. (Pubitemid 13204304)
44. Sagot P, Caroit Y, Winer N, Lopes P, Boog G,. Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conisation of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 58: 53-8.
45. Haffenden DK, Bigrigg A, Codling BW, Read MD,. Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 1059-60. (Pubitemid 23344184)
46. Kasum M, Kuvacic I,. Pregnancy outcome after conization. Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol 1991; 31: 31-4.
47. Ludviksson K, Sandstrom B,. Outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy-a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1982; 14: 135-42. (Pubitemid 13174413)
48. Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Lois E, Papanikou E, Malamou-Mitsi V, Agnantis NJ,. Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for micro-invasive (FIGO Stage IA1) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 86: 10-3. (Pubitemid 34757043)