Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 109, Issue 2 PART 1, 2007, Pages 309-313

  Jakobsson, Maija ^a   Gissler, Mika ^a   Sainio, Susanna ^a   Paavonen, Jorma ^a   Tapper, Anna Maija ^a  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH RATE; BIRTH WEIGHT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; GESTATION PERIOD; HUMAN; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL SMOKING; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PERINATAL DEATH; PERINATAL PERIOD; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION;

ADULT; CAUTERY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COHORT STUDIES; CONIZATION; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE BIRTH; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33846695199     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000253239.87040.23     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Langhoff-Roos J, Kesmodel U, Jacobsson B, Rasmussen S, Vogel I. Spontaneous preterm delivery in primiparous women at low risk in Denmark: population based study. BMJ 2006;22:937-9.
2. Shennan AH, Bewley S. Why should preterm deliveries be rising? BMJ 2006;332:924-5.
3. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet2006;367:489-98.
4. Gissler M, Haukka J. Finnish health and social welfare registers in epidemiological research. Norsk Epidemiologi 2004;14:1-8.
5. Gissler M, Shelley J. Quality of data on subsequent events in a routine Medical Birth Register. Med Inform Internet Med 2002;27:33-8.
6. Odeh RE, Owen DB, Birnbaum ZW, Fisher L. Pocket book of statistical tables. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1977. p. 2-10.
7. Jaakkola N, Jaakkola MS, Gissler M, Jaakkola JJ. Smoking during pregnancy in Finland: determinants and trends, 1987-1997. Am J Public Health 2001;91:284-6.
8. Lee NH. The effect of cone biopsy on subsequent pregnancy outcome. Gynecol Oncol 1978;6:1-6.
9. Jones CJ, Brinton LA, Hamman RF, Stolley PD, Lehman HF, Levine RS, et al. Risk factors for in situ cervical cancer: results from a case-control study. Cancer Res 1990;50:3657-62.
10. Leiman G, Harrison NA, Rubin A. Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: complications related to cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:14-8.
11. Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE. The outcome of pregnancy after CO2 laser conisation of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:717-20.
12. Gunasekera PC, Phipps JH, Lewis BV. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LEEP) compared to carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of CIN: a superior mode of treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:995-8.
13. Sagot P, Caroit Y, Winer N, Lopes P, Boog G. Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conization of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995;58:53-8.
14. Althuisius SM, Schornagel IJ, Dekker GA van Geijn HP, Hummel P. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the cervix and time of delivery in subsequent pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;72:31-4.
15. Blomfield PI, Buxton J, Dunn J, Luesley DM. Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:620-5.
16. Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcone T, Franco E. The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: North American experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1246-50.
17. Tan L, Pepra E, Haloob RK. The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;24:25-7.
18. Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, Dargent D. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;106:214-8.
19. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 2004;291:2100-6.
20. Samson SL, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, McKay DJ, Gill GH. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:325-32.
21. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Luscher KP. Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: influence of cone height. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:978-82.
22. Myllynen L, Karjalainen O. Pregnancy outcome after combined amputation and conization of the uterine cervix. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1984;73:345-9.
23. Auvinen E, Niemi M, Malm C, Zilliacus R, Trontti A, Fingerroos R, et al. High prevalence of HPV among female students in Finland. Scand J Infect Dis 2005;37:873-6.
24. Moscicki AB, Shiboski S, Hills NK, Powell KJ, Jay N, Hanson EN, et al. Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women. Lancet 2004;364:1678-83.