Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Lancet

Volumn 367, Issue 9509, 2006, Pages 489-498

  Kyrgiou, M ^a,g   Koliopoulos, G ^b   Martin Hirsch, P ^a   Arbyn, M ^c,d   Prendiville, W ^e   Paraskevaidis, E ^f  

^a LANCASHIRE TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Belgium)

^d INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER   (France)

^e Pathology Research Laboratory   (Ireland)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^g ROYAL PRESTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CANCER SCREENING; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; EMBASE; EXCISION; FEMALE FERTILITY; HUMAN; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; LASER SURGERY; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE FETUS MEMBRANE RUPTURE; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION;

EID: 32144454702     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Quinn M, Babb P, Jones J, Allen E Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of the cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics BMJ 318 1999 904 908
2. Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener HC, Miller ID, Mann E, Jandial L, Fisher PM A population-based study of microinvasive disease of the cervix - a colposcopic and cytologic analysis Gynecol Oncol 45 1992 9 12
3. Herbert A Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated Cytopathology 11 2000 471 479
4. Kitchener HC, Cruickshank ME, Farmery E The 1993 British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology/National Coordinating Network United Kingdom Colposcopy Survey. Comparison with 1988 and the response to introduction of guidelines Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102 1995 549 552
5. Prendiville W, Cullimore J, Norman S Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96 1989 1054 1060
6. Martin-Hirsch P, Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener H Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 2000 CD001318
7. Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Willan AR, Chan BK Treatment outcomes for squamous intraepithelial lesions Int J Gynaecol Obstet 68 2000 25 33
8. Paraskevaidis E, Jandial L, Mann EM, Fisher PM, Kitchener HC Pattern of treatment failure following laser for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: implications for follow-up protocol Obstet Gynecol 78 1991 80 83
9. Chew GK, Jandial L, Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener HC Pattern of CIN recurrence following laser ablation treatment: long-term follow-up Int J Gynecol Cancer 9 1999 487 490
10. Soutter WP, de Barros Lopes A, Fletcher A Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Lancet 349 1997 978 980
11. Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcone T, Franco E The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: North American experience Am J Obstet Gynecol 172 1995 1246 1250
12. Althusius SM, Schornagel IJ, Dekker GA, Van Geijn HP, Hummel P Loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the cervix and time of delivery in subsequent pregnancy Int J Gynaecol Obstet 72 2001 31 34
13. Wakita K, Izumi T, Kuramoto H, Sasaki N, Shimada N Pregnancy after laser therapy for the treatment of uterine cervical neoplasia J Clin Laser Med Surg 8 1990 71 76
14. Novikova EG, Antoshechkina MA Reproductive function after the organ-preserving treatment of early cancerous pathology of the cervix uteri Akush Ginekol(Mosk) 2 1994 44 47
15. Iwanari O, Moriyama M, Miyako J, Date Y, Kitao M Studies on pregnancy after laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Nippon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi 24 1989 2375 2380
16. Keijser KGG, Kenemans P, Van Der Zanden PHTH, Schijf CPT, Vooijs GP, Rolland R Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Diagnosis and treatment in one procedure Am J Obstet Gynecol 166 1992 1281 1287
17. Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, Dargent D Long-term outcome of a randomised study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 106 2003 214 218
18. Grio R, Rizzitiello A, Colla F, Leotta E Therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and fertility Minerva Ginecol 54 2002 325 331
19. Spuhler S, Outcha Adjahoto E, Raszka K, De Grandi P Consequences of laser CO2 treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias on the anatomic and functional integrity of the cervix J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 24 1995 127 133
20. El-Bastawissi AY, Becker TM, Daling JR Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome Obstet Gynecol 93 1999 207 212
21. Mitsuhashi A, Sekiya S Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) during first trimester of pregnancy Int J Gynaecol Obstet 71 2000 237 239
22. Duval S, Tweedie R A non-parametric "trim & fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analyses J Am Stat Assoc 95 2000 89 98
23. DerSimonian R, Laird N Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 7 1986 177 188
24. Cochran WG The combination of estimates from different experiments Biometrics 10 1954 101 129
25. Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Lolis E, Papanikou E, Malamou-Mitsi V, Agnantis N Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage IA1) cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 86 2002 10 13
26. Tan L, Pepra E, Haloob RK The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix J Obstet Gynaecol 24 2004 25 27
27. Braet PG, Peel JM, Fenton DW A case controlled study of the outcome of pregnancy following loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone J Obstet Gynecol 14 1994 79 82
28. Haffenden DK, Bigrigg A, Codling BW, Read MD Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100 1993 1059 1060
29. Blomfield PI, Buxton J, Dunn J, Luesley DM Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone Am J Obstet Gynecol 169 1993 620 625
30. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery JAMA 291 2004 2100 2106
31. Samson SL, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, McKay DJ, Gill GH The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome Obstet Gynecol 105 2005 325 332
32. Cruickshank ME, Flanelly G, Campbell DM, Kitchener HC Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102 1995 467 470
33. Turlington WT, Wright BD, Powell JL Impact of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future fertility J Reprod Med 41 1996 815 818
34. Bigrigg A, Haffenden DK, Sheehan AL, Codling BW, Read MD Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zone Lancet 343 1994 32 34
35. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Luscher KP Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide conization of the cervix: influence of cone height Obstet Gynecol 90 1997 978 982
36. Bekassy Z, Iosif CS Laser "miniconisation" and the outcome of subsequent pregnancy Arch Gynecol Obstet 258 1996 75 79
37. Sagot P, Caroit Y, Winer N, Lopez P, Boog G Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conisation of the uterine cervix Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 58 1995 53 58
38. Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE The outcome of pregnancy after CO2 laser conization of the cervix Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100 1993 717 720
39. Forsmo S, Hansen MH, Jacobsen BK, Oian P Pregnancy outcome after laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 75 1996 139 143
40. Spitzer M, Herman J, Krumholz BA, Lesser M The fertility of women after cervical laser surgery Obstet Gynecol 86 1995 504 508
41. van Rooijen M, Persson E Pregnancy outcome after laser vaporisation of the cervix Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78 1999 346 348
42. Jones JM, Sweetnam P, Hibbard BM The outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy of the cervix: a case-control study Br J Obstet Gynaecol 86 1979 913
43. Kuoppala T, Saarikoski S Pregnancy and delivery after cone biopsy of the cervix Arch Gynecol 237 1986 149 154
44. Weber T, Obel EB Pregnancy complications following conization of the uterine cervix (2) Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 58 1979 347 351
45. Buller RE, Jones HW Pregnancy following cervical conization Am J Obstet Gynecol 142 1982 506 511
46. Kasum M, Kuvacic I [Pregnancy outcome after conization] Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol 31 1991 31 34
47. Kristensen GB The outcome of pregnancy and preterm delivery after conization of the cervix Arch Gynecol Obstet 236 1985 127 130
48. Kristensen J, Langhoff-Ross J, Kristensen FB Increased risk of preterm birth in women with cervical conization Obstet Gynecol 81 1993 1005 1008
49. Larsson G, Grundsell H, Gullberg B, Svennerud S Outcome of pregnancy after conization Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 61 1982 461 466
50. Ludviksson K, Sandstrom B Outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy - a case control study Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 14 1982 135 142
51. Praest J Conizatio cervicis uteri Ugeskrift For Laeger 51 1979 3509 3511
52. Colposcopy and programme management Guidelines for the NHS Cervical Screening Programme NHSCSP (National Health System Cervical Screening Programme) Publication no 20 2004 4 5
53. International Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC) Cervix cancer screening 10 2005 IARC handbooks of cancer prevention Lyon 1 302
54. Ostor AG Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review Int J Gynecol Pathol 12 1993 186 192
55. Holowaty P, Miller AB, Rohan T, To T Natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix J Natl Cancer Inst 91 1999 252 258