Pregnancy outcomes after cold knife conization related to excised cone dimensions

Journal of Reproductive Medicine

Volumn 59, Issue 1-2, 2014, Pages 81-86

  Sozen, Hamdullah ^a   Namazov, Ahmed ^a   Cakir, Seda ^a   Akdemir, Yesim ^a   Vatansever, Dogan ^a   Karateke, Ates ^a  

^a Zeynep Kamil Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cervix; Cold knife conization; Conization; Gynecologic surgery; Premature births; Preterm delivery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLD KNIFE CONIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERINATAL PERIOD; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE FETUS MEMBRANE RUPTURE; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION;

ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CERVIX UTERI; COHORT STUDIES; CONIZATION; FEMALE; FETAL MEMBRANES, PREMATURE RUPTURE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE BIRTH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84892838029     PISSN: 00247758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Consensus Statement: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on cervical cancer, April 1-3, 1996. Gynecol Oncol 1997;66:351-361
2. Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener HC, Miller ID, et al: A populationbased study of microinvasive disease of the cervix: A colposcopic and cytologic analysis. Gynecol Oncol 1992;45:9-12
3. Arbyn M, Simoens C, Van Oyen H, et al: Analysis of 13 million individual patient records pertaining to Pap smears, colposcopies, biopsies and surgery on the uterine cervix (Belgium, 1996-2000). Prev Med 2009;48:438-443
4. Blomfield P, Buxton J, Dunn J, et al: Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:620-625
5. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al: Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: Systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet 2006;367:489-498
6. van de Vijver A, Poppe W, Verguts J, et al: Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: A retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital. BJOG 2010;117:268-273
7. Ortoft G, Henriksen T, Hansen E, et al: After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy. BJOG 2010;117:258-267
8. Klaritsch P, Reich O, Giuliani A, et al: Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:604-607
9. Kristensen J, Langhoff-Ross J, Borlum-Kristensen F: Increased risk of preterm birth in women with cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:1000-1008
10. Svare JA, Andersen LF, Langhoff-Roos J, et al: The relationship between prior cervical conisation, cervical microbial colonization and preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992;47:41-45
11. Leiman G, Harrison NA, Rubin A: Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: Complications related to cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:14-18
12. Mccredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, et al: Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:425-434
13. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wanf W, et al: Treatment for cervical intraepitheliel neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 2004;291:2100-2106