Rubrics and corrective feedback in ESL writing: A longitudinal case study of an L2 writer

Assessing Writing

Volumn 30, Issue , 2016, Pages 3-20

  Ene, Estela ^a   Kosobucki, Virginia ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corrective feedback; Direct feedback; Indirect feedback; Rubrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978901473     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baker, W., Bricker, R.H., The effects of direct and indirect speech acts on native English and ESL speakers’ perception of teacher written feedback. System 38:1 (2010), 75–84.
2. Balester, V., How writing rubrics fail: toward a multicultural model. Inoue, A.B., Poe, M., (eds.) Race and writing assessment, 2012, Peter Lang, New York, NY, 63–77.
3. Bitchener, J., Ferris, D.R., Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. 2012, Routledge, New York and London.
4. Bitchener, J., Knoch, U., The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research 12:3 (2008), 409–431.
5. Bitchener, J., Knoch, U., The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal 63:3 (2008), 204–211.
6. Bitchener, J., Knoch, U., The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System 37:2 (2009), 322–329.
7. Bitchener, J., Knoch, U., Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 2010, 207e217.
8. Broad, B., What we really value: beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing. 2003, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
9. Brown, S., Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. 2007, Pearson Education, White Plains, NY.
10. Bruce, E., Hamp-Lyons, L., Looking for the academic voice: assessing undergraduate writing. Kavanagh, M., Robinson, L., (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 BALEAP conference. The Janus moment: revisiting the past and building the future, 2015, Garnet, Reading, UK, 63–75.
11. Crusan, D., Assessment in the second language writing classroom. 2010, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
12. Crusan, D., Placement testing. Chapelle, C.A., (eds.) The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 2014, Wiley/Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, 1–6.
13. Crusan, D., Dance, ten; looks: three: why rubrics matter [Editorial]. Assessing Writing 26 (2015), 1–4.
14. Diab, R., Balaa, L., Developing detailed rubrics for assessing critique writing: impact on EFL University students’ performance and attitudes. TESOL Journal 2:1 (2011), 52–72, 10.5054/tj.2011.244132.
15. ELS, Reading and writing: Conrad. 3rd ed., 2013, Pearson Learning Solutions, Boston, MA, 117–118.
16. Ellis, R., A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal 63 (2009), 97–107.
17. Ene, E., Upton, T., Learner uptake of teacher electronic feedback in ESL composition. System 46 (2014), 80–95.
18. Evans, N.W., Hartshorn, K.J., Allen Tuioti, E., Written corrective feedback: the practitioner's perspective. International Journal of English Studies 10:2 (2010), 47–77.
19. Ferris, D.R., Hedgcock, J.S., Teaching ESL composition: purpose, process and practice. 2nd ed., 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
20. Ferris, D.R., Roberts, B., Error feedback in L2 writing classes: how explicit does it need to be?. Journal of Second Language Writing 10:3 (2001), 161–184.
21. Ferris, D.R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., Senna, M., Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (2013), 307–329.
22. Ferris, D.R., Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2007), 165–193.
23. Ferris, D.R., Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32 (2010), 181–201.
24. Ferris, D.R., Treatment of error in second language student writing. 2nd ed., 2011, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
25. Hinkel, E., Teaching academic ESL writing: practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. 2004, Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
26. Hyland, K., Hyland, F., Feedback in second language writing: contexts and issues. 2006, University Press, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.
27. Hyland, K., Second language writing. 2003, University Press, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.
28. Keh, C., Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal 44:4 (1990), 294–305.
29. Kohn, A., The trouble with rubrics. English Journal 95:4 (2006), 12–16.
30. Lalande, J.F., Reducing composition errors: an experiment. Modern Language Journal 66 (1982), 140–149.
31. Lee, I., Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: assessment for learning or assessment of learning?. Assessing Writing 12:3 (2007), 180–198.
32. Lyster, R., Ranta, L., Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19:1 (1997), 37–66.
33. Matsuda, P.K., Jeffery, J.V., Voice in student essays. Hyland, K., Sancho-Guinda, C., (eds.) Voice and stance in academic writing, 2012, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY, 151–165.
34. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: a review. Educational Research Review 9 (2013), 129–144, 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.
35. Robb, T., Ross, S., Shortreed, I., Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 20 (1986), 83–93.
36. Schmidt, R., The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11:2 (1990), 129–158.
37. Schmidt, R., Attention. Robinson, P., (eds.) Cognition and second language instruction, 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 3–32.
38. Shao, X., On written corrective feedback in L2 writing. English Language Teaching 8:3 (2015), 155–168, 10.5539/elt.v8n3p155.
39. Sheen, Y., The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41:2 (2007), 255–283.
40. Sheen, Y., Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32:2 (2010), 201–234.
41. Stevenson, M., Phakiti, A., The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing 19 (2014), 51–65.
42. Storch, N., Wigglesworth, G., Learner’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32:2 (2010), 303–334.
43. Swain, M., Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Gass, S.M., Madden, C.G., (eds.) Input in second language acquisition, 1985, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 64–81.
44. Swain, M., Three functions of output in second language learning. Gook, G., Seidlhofer, B., (eds.) Principle and practice in applied linguistics, 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 125–144.
45. Truscott, J., The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46 (1996), 327–369.
46. Ware, P., Computer-generated feedback on student writing. TESOL Quarterly 45 (2011), 769–774.
47. Weigle, S.C., Assessing writing. 2002, University Press, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.
48. Weigle, S.C., Teaching writing teachers about assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2007), 194–209.
49. Wilson, M., Rethinking rubrics in writing assessment. 2006, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.