Novel and successful free comments method for sensory characterization of chocolate ice cream: A comparative study between pivot profile and comment analysis

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 99, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 3408-3420

  Fonseca, Fernando G A ^a   Esmerino, Erick A ^a   Filho, Elson R Tavares ^a   Ferraz, Juliana P ^a   da Cruz, Adriano G ^b   Bolini, Helena M A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO FEDERAL DE EDUCAÇÃO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Comment analysis; Consumer perception; Ice cream; Pivot profile; Sensory characterization

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; CACAO; CHOCOLATE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; FOOD PACKAGING; HUMAN; ICE CREAM; PERCEPTION; TASTE;

CACAO; CHOCOLATE; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; FOOD LABELING; HUMANS; ICE CREAM; PERCEPTION; TASTE;

EID: 84975718053     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-9982     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Albert A., Varela P., Salvador A., Hough G., Fiszman S. Overcoming the issues in the sensory description of hot served food with a complex texture. Application of QDA®, flash profiling and projective mapping using panels with different degrees of training. Food Qual. Prefer. 2011, 22:463-473.
2. Alberts H.J.E.M., Schneider F., Martijn C. Dealing efficiently with emotions: Acceptance-based coping with negative emotions requires fewer resources than suppression. Cogn. Emot. 2012, 26:863-870.
3. Ares G. Methodological challenges in sensory characterization. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 3:1-5.
4. Ares G., Antúnez L., Oliveira D., Alcaire F., Giménez A., Berget I., Næs T., Varela P. Pole selection in polarized sensory positioning: Insights from the cognitive aspects behind the task. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 46:48-57.
5. Ares G., Deliza R. Studying the influence of package shape and colour on consumer expectations of milk desserts using word association and conjoint analysis. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21:930-937.
6. Ares G., Mawad F., Giménez A., Maiche A. Influence of rational and intuitive thinking styles on food choice: Preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study with yogurt labels. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 31:28-37.
7. Aykan V., Sezgin E., Guzel-Seydim Z.B. Use of fat replacers in the production of reduced-calorie vanilla ice cream. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2008, 110:516-520.
8. Bécue-Bertaut M. Tracking verbal-based methods beyond conventional descriptive analysis in food science bibliography. A statistical approach. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 32(A):2-15.
9. Booth D.A., Conner M.T. Characterisation and measurement of influences on food acceptability by analysis of choice differences: Theory and practice. Food Qual. Prefer. 1990, 2:75-85.
10. Brody A.L., Lord J.B. Developing New Food Products for a Changing Marketplace 2007, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 2nd.
11. Cadena R.S., Bolini H.M.A. Time-intensity analysis and acceptance test for traditional and light vanilla ice cream. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44:677-683.
12. Cadena R.S., Cruz A.G., Faria J.A.F., Bolini H.M.A. Reduced fat and sugar vanilla ice creams: Sensory profiling and external preference mapping. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:4842-4850.
13. Cruz A.G., Antunes A.E.C., Sousa A.L.O.P., Faria J.A.F., Saad S.M.I. Ice-cream as a probiotic food carrier. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42:1233-1239.
14. Cruz A.G., Cadena R.S., Castro W.F., Esmerino E.A., Rodrigues J.B., Gaze L., Faria J.A.F., Freitas M.Q., Deliza R., Bolini H.M.A. Consumer perception of probiotic yogurt: Performance of check all that apply (CATA), projective mapping, sorting and intensity scale. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54:601-610.
15. da Silva V.M., Minim V.P.R., Ferreira M.A.M., Souza P.H.P., Moraes L.E.S., Minim L.A. Study of the perception of consumers in relation to different ice cream concepts. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 36:161-168.
16. Dan-Glauser E.S., Gross J.J. The temporal dynamics of emotional acceptance: Experience, expression, and physiology. Biol. Psychol. 2015, 108:1-12.
17. de Saldamando L., Antúnez L., Torres-moreno M., Giménez A., Ares G. Reliability of polarized projective mapping with consumers. J. Sens. Stud. 2015, 30:280-294.
18. Dervişoglu M., Yazici F. Note. The effect of citrus fibre on the physical, chemical and sensory properties of ice cream. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2006, 12:159-164.
19. Esmerino E.A., Cruz A.G., Pereira E.P.R., Rodrigues J.B., Faria J.A.F., Bolini H.M.A. The influence of sweeteners in probiotic petit suisse cheese in concentrations equivalent to that of sucrose. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96:5512-5521.
20. Esmerino E.A., Paixão J.A., Cruz A.G., Garitta L., Hough G., Bolini H.M.A. Survival analysis: A consumer-friendly method to estimate the optimum sucrose level in probiotic petit suisse. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98:7544-7551.
21. Evans J.S., Stanovich K.E. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2013, 8:223-241.
22. Ferraz J.L., Cruz A.G., Cadena R.S., Freitas M.Q., Pinto U.M., Carvalho C.C., Faria J.A.F., Bolini H.M.A. Sensory acceptance and survival of probiotic bacteria in ice cream produced with different overrun levels. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77:S24-S28.
23. Fleming E.E., Ziegler G.R., Hayes J.E. Check-all-that-apply (CATA), sorting, and polarized sensory positioning (PSP) with astringent stimuli. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 45:41-49.
24. Frøst M.B., Heymann H., Bredie W.L.P., Dijksterhuis G.B., Martens M. Sensory measurement of dynamic flavour intensity in ice cream with different fat levels and flavourings. Food Qual. Prefer. 2005, 16:305-314.
25. Galmarini M.V., Symoneaux R., Chollet S., Zamora M.C. Understanding apple consumers' expectations in terms of likes and dislikes. Use of comment analysis in a cross-cultural study. Appetite 2013, 62:27-36.
26. Giboreau A., Dacremont C., Guerrand S., Dubois D. Décrire: Identifier ou catégoriser?. Le Sentir et le Dire 2009, 211-232. L'Harmattan, Paris, France. D. Dubois (Ed.).
27. Hanaei F., Cuvelier G., Sieffermann J.M. Consumer texture descriptions of a set of processed cheese. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 40(B):316-325.
28. Javidi F., Razavi S.M.A., Behrouzian F., Alghooneh A. The influence of basil seed gum, guar gum and their blend on the rheological, physical and sensory properties of low fat ice cream. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 52:625-633.
29. Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow 2011, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY.
30. King S.C., Meiselman H.L., Carr B.T. Measuring emotions associated with foods in consumer testing. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21:1114-1116.
31. Kirkmeyer S.V., Tepper B.J. Understanding creaminess perception of dairy products using free-choice profiling and genetic responsivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Chem. Senses 2003, 28:527-536.
32. Lawrence G., Symoneaux R., Maitre I., Brossaud F., Maestrojuan M., Mehinagic E. Using the free comments method for sensory characterisation of Cabernet Franc wines: Comparison with classical profiling in a professional context. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 30:145-155.
33. Li Z., Marshall R., Heymann H., Fernando L. Effect of milk fat content on flavor perception of vanilla ice cream. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80:3133-3141.
34. Lieberman M.D. Intuition: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychol. Bull. 2000, 126:109-137.
35. Macfie H.J., Bratchell N., Greenhoff K., Vallis L.V. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. J. Sens. Stud. 1989, 4:129-148.
36. Meilgaard M., Civille G.V., Carr B.T. Sensory Evaluation and Techniques 1999, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL. 3rd.
37. Morewedge C.K., Kahneman D. Associative processes in intuitive judgment. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:435-440.
38. Moskowitz H.R., Kapsalis J.C., Cardello A.V., Fishken D., Maller O., Segars R.A. Determining relationships among objective, expert, and consumer measures of texture. Food Technol. 1979, 33:84-88.
39. Moussaoui K.A., Varela P. Exploring consumer product profiling techniques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21:1088-1099.
40. Ozdemir C., Arslaner A., Ozdemir S., Allahyari M. The production of ice cream using stevia as a sweetener. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52:7545-7548.
41. Parente M.E., Manzoni A.V., Ares G. External preference mapping of commercial antiaging creams based on consumers' responses to a check-all-that-apply question. J. Sens. Stud. 2011, 26:158-166.
42. Pennycook G., Fugelsang J.A., Koehler D.J. What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognit. Psychol. 2015, 80:34-72.
43. Reinbach H.C., Giacalone D., Ribeiro L.M., Bredie W.L.P., Frøst M.B. Comparison of three sensory profiling methods based on consumer perception: CATA, CATA with intensity and Napping®. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 32(B):160-166.
44. Saunders A.B. Ice Cream and Desserts | Dairy Desserts. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences 2011, 905-912. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 2nd. J.W. Fuquay (Ed.).
45. Severini C., Corbo M.R., Derossi A., Bevilacqua A., Giuliani R. Use of humectants for the stabilization of pesto sauce. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 43:1041-1046.
46. Soukoulis C., Chandrinos I., Tzia C. Study of the functionality of selected hydrocolloids and their blends with κ-carrageenan on storage quality of vanilla ice cream. Food Sci. Technol. (Campinas) 2008, 41:1816-1827.
47. Soukoulis C., Tzia C. Response surface mapping of the sensory characteristics and acceptability of chocolate ice cream containing alternate sweetening agents. J. Sens. Stud. 2010, 25:50-75.
48. Spinelli S., Masi C., Dinnella C., Zoboli G.P., Monteleone E. How does it make you feel? A new approach to measuring emotions in food product experience. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 37:109-122.
49. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?. Behav. Brain Sci. 2000, 23:645-665.
50. Su Y., Rao L.-L., Li X., Wang Y., Li S. From quality to quantity: The role of common features in consumer preference. J. Econ. Psychol. 2012, 33:1043-1058.
51. Sun-Waterhouse D., Edmonds L., Wadhwa S.S., Wibisono R. Producing ice cream using a substantial amount of juice from kiwifruit with green, gold or red flesh. Food Res. Int. 2013, 50:647-656.
52. Symoneaux R., Galmarini M.V., Mehinagic E. Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping. A case study on apples. Food Qual. Prefer. 2012, 24:59-66.
53. Szczesniak A.S. Texture is a sensory property. Food Qual. Prefer. 2002, 13:215-225.
54. ten Kleij F., Musters P.A.D. Text analysis of open-ended survey responses: A complementary method to preference mapping. Food Qual. Prefer. 2003, 14:43-52.
55. Thuillier B., Valentin D., Marchal R., Dacremont C. Pivot© profile: A new descriptive method based on free description. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 42:66-77.
56. Toplak M.E., Sorge G.B., Benoit A., West R.F., Stanovich K.E. Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2010, 30:562-581.
57. Valentin D., Chollet S., Lelièvre M., Abdi H. Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food science. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47:1563-1578.
58. Varela P., Ares G., Giménez A., Gámbaro A. Influence of brand information on consumers' expectations and liking of powdered drinks in central location tests. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21:873-880.
59. Warren M.M., Hartel R.W. Structural, compositional, and sensorial properties of United States commercial ice cream products. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79:E2005-E2013.