Pole selection in Polarized Sensory Positioning: Insights from the cognitive aspects behind the task

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 46, Issue , 2015, Pages 48-57

  Ares, Gastón ^a   Antúnez, Lucía ^a   Oliveira, Denize ^b   Alcaire, Florencia ^a   Giménez, Ana ^a   Berget, Ingunn ^c   Næs, Tormod ^c,d   Varela, Paula ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^c NOFIMA   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Consumer; PSP; Reference based methodologies; Sensory characterization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937042304     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Antúnez A., Salvador A., de Saldamando L., Varela P., Giménez A., Ares G. Evaluation of data aggregation in Polarized Sensory Positioning. Journal of Sensory Studies 2015, 30:46-55.
2. Ares G., de Saldamando L., Vidal L., Antúnez L., Giménez A., Varela P. Polarized Projective Mapping: Comparison with Polarized Sensory Positioning approaches. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28:510-518.
3. Ares G., Varela P. Comparison of novel methodologies for sensory characterization. Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer profiling 2014, 365-389. CRC Press, Boca Raton. P. Varela, G. Ares (Eds.).
4. Cadena R.S., Caimi D., Jaunarena I., Lorenzo I., Vidal L., Ares G., et al. Comparison of rapid sensory characterization methodologies for the development of functional yogurts. Food Research International 2014, 64:446-455.
5. Chrea, C., Teillet, E., & Navarro, S. (2011). Application of the polarized sensory positioning in the cosmetic area. In: 9th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, 4-8 September, 2011, Toronto, Canada.
6. Costa A.I.A., Jongen W.M.F. New insights into consumer-led food product development. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2006, 17:457-465.
7. de Saldamando L., Delgado J., Herencia P., Giménez A., Ares G. Polarized sensory positioning: Do conclusions depend on the poles?. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 29:25-32.
8. Dehlholm C., Brockhoff P.B., Bredie W.L.P. Confidence ellipses: A variation based on parametric bootstrapping applicable on multiple factor analysis results for rapid graphical evaluation. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:278-280.
9. El Ghaziri A., Qannari E.M. Measures of association between two datasets: Application to sensory data. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 40:116-124.
10. Josse, J., & Holmes, S. (2014). Measures of dependence between random vectors and tests of independence. Literature review. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Library. Available at (accessed 22.11.14). http://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.7383v3.pdf.
11. Josse J., Pagés J., Husson F. Testing the significance of the RV coefficient. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2008, 53:82-91.
12. Lê S., Josse J., Husson F. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 2008, 25(1):1-18.
13. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2013, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
14. Robert P., Escoufier Y. A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV coefficient. Applied Statistics 1976, 25:257-265.
15. Teillet E., Schlich P., Urbano C., Cordelle S., Guichard E. Sensory methodologies and the taste of water. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:967-976.
16. Teillet E. Polarized sensory positioning methodologies. Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer profiling 2014, 255-270. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. P. Varela, G. Ares (Eds.).
17. Tomic O., Berget I., Næs T. A comparison of generalised procrustes analysis and multiple factor analysis for projective mapping data. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 43:34-46.
18. Tomic O., Forde C., Delahunty C., Næs T. Performance indices in descriptive sensory analysis - A complimentary screening tool for assessor and panel performance. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28:122-133.
19. Varela P., Ares G. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Research International 2012, 48:893-908.
20. Varela, P., Svartebekk Myhrer, K., Næs, T., & Hersleth, M. (2014). The best of both worlds: Rapidity and enhanced discrimination with a trained panel. Exploration of global and partial PSP with a descriptive step. In: 6th European Conference on Sensory and Consumer Research, 7-10 September 2014, Copenhaguen, Denmark.