Tracking verbal-based methods beyond conventional descriptive analysis in food science bibliography. A statistical approach

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 32, Issue , 2014, Pages 2-15

  Bécue Bertaut, Mónica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bibliographic study; Characteristic words; Correspondence analysis; Multiple factor analysis for contingency tables; Textual statistics; Verbalisation tasks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886292410     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alfaraz P.H., Mirta-Calviño A. Bibliometric study on food science and technology: Scientific production in Iberian-American countries (1991-2000). Scientometrics 2004, 61:89-102.
2. Ares G., Barreiro C., Deliza R., Giménez A., Gámbaro A. Consumer expectations and perception of chocolate milk desserts enriched with antioxidants. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:243-260.
3. Ares G., Deliza R., Barreiro C., Giménez A., Gámbaro A. Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:417-426.
4. Ares G., Giménez A., Barreiro C., Gámbaro A. Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:286-294.
5. Ares G., Giménez A., Gámbaro A. Understanding consumers' perception of conventional and functional yogurts using word association and hard laddering. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:636-643.
6. Baccino T., Cabrol-Bass D., Candau J., Meyer C., Scheer T., Vuillaume M., et al. Sharing an olfactory experience: The impact of oral communication. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:43-452.
7. Bansard J.Y., Kerbaol M., Coatrieux J.L. An analysis of IEEE publications in biomedical engineering. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 2006, 25:6-12.
8. Bansard J.Y., Rebholz-Schuhman D., Cameron G., Clark D., van Mulligen E., Beltrame F., et al. Medical informatics and bioinformatics: A bibliometric study. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 2007, 11:237-243.
9. Barcenas P., Pérez Elortondo F.J., Salmerón J., Albisu M. Development of a preliminary sensory lexicon and standard references of ewes milk cheeses aided by multivariate statistical procedures. Journal of Sensory Studies 1999, 14:161-179.
10. Bécue-Bertaut M., Álvarez-Esteban R., Pagès J. Rating of products through scores and free-text assertions: Comparing and combining both. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:122-134.
11. Bécue-Bertaut M., Lê S. Simultaneous analysis of categorical and multilingual textual variables structured according to a hierarchy. Application to a cross-cultural study in wine industry. Journal of Sensory Studies 2011, 26:299-310.
12. Bécue-Bertaut M., Pagès J. A principal axes method for comparing multiple contingency tables: MFACT. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2004, 45:481-503.
13. Bécue-Bertaut M., Pagès J. Multiple factor analysis and clustering of a mixture of quantitative, categorical and frequency data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2008, 52:3255-3268.
14. Benzécri J.P. Analyse des données. Analyse des correspondances 1973, Vol. 2. Dunod, Paris.
15. Benzécri J.P. Pratique de l'analyse des données. Linguistique & lexicologie 1981, Vol. 3. Dunod, Paris.
16. Blancher G., Chollet S., Kesteloot R., Nguyen Hoang D., Cuvelier G., Sieffermann J.M. French and Vietnamese: How do they describe texture characteristics of the same food? A case study with jellies. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:560-575.
17. Cadoret M., Lê S., Pagès J. A factorial approach for sorting task data (FAST). Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:410-417.
18. Cairncross S.E., Sjostrom L.B. "Flavor profiles - A new approach to flavor problems. Food Technology 1950, 4:308-311.
19. Carr B.T., Craig-Petsinger D., Hadlich S. A case study in relating sensory descriptive data to product concept fit and consumer vocabulary. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:407-412.
20. Civille G.V., Lapsley K., Huang G., Yada S., Seltsam J. Development of an almond lexicon to assess the sensory properties of almond varieties. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:146-162.
21. Dairou V., Sieffermann J.-M. A comparison of 14 jams characterized by conventional profile and a quick original method, the Flash Profile. Journal of Food Science 2002, 67:826-834.
22. Delarue J., Sieffermann J.M. Sensory mapping using flash profile. Comparison with a conventional descriptive method for the evaluation of the flavour of fruit dairy products. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:383-392.
23. Dooley L., Lee Y., Meullenet J.F. The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profile to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:394-401.
24. Escofier B., Pagès J. Analyses factorielles simples et multiples 2008, Dunod, Paris. 4th ed.
25. Faye P., Brémaud D., Durand Daubin M., Courcoux P., Giboreau A., Nicod H. Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naive subjects; an alternative to descriptive mappings. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:781-791.
26. Feinerer, I. (2013). Introduction to the tm package text mining in R. http://www.cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tm/vignettes/tm.pdf.
27. Feinerer I., Hornik K., Meyer D. Text mining infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software 2008, 25:1-54. [http://www.jstatsoft.org/].
28. Galmarini M.V., Symoneaux R., Chollet S., Zamora M.C. Appetite 2013, 62:27-36.
29. Guerrero L., Claret A., Verbeke W., Enderli G., Zakowska-Biemans S., Vanhonacker F., et al. Perception of traditional food products in six European regions using free word association. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:225-233.
30. Husson, F., Josse, J., Lê, S., & Mazet, J. (2007). FactoMineR: Factor analysis and data mining with R. R package version 1.19. http://www.cran.R-project.org/package=FactoMineR.
31. Kerbaol M., Bansard J.Y., Coatrieux J.L. An analysis of IEEE publications. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 2006, 25:6-9.
32. Kinski B.F., Drake M.A., Civille G.V., Dean L.L., Hendrix K.W., Sanders T.H. The development of a lexicon for frozen vegetable soybeans (edamame). Journal of Sensory Studies 2006, 21:644-653.
33. Kostov B., Bécue-Bertaut M., Husson F. Multiple factor analysis for contingency tables in factomineR package. R Journal 2013, 5:29-39.
34. Lancaster, B., & Foley, M. (2007). Determining statistical significance for choose-all-that-apply question responses. In: 7th Pangborn sensory science symposium. August 16th 2007, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
35. Lawless L.J.R., Hottenstein A., Ellingsworth J. The McCormick spice wheel: a systematic and visual approach to sensory lexicon development. Journal of Sensory Studies 2012, 27:37-47.
36. Lê S., Josse J., Husson F. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 2008, 25.
37. Lebart L., Salem A., Berry L. Exploring textual data 1998, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
38. Lee Y., Findlay C., Meullenet J.F. Experimental consideration for the use of check-all-that apply questions to describe the sensory properties of orange juices. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 2013, 48:215-219.
39. Moussaoui K.A., Varela P. Exploring consumer product profiling techniques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:1088-1099.
40. Murray J.M., Delahunty C.M., Baxter I.A. Descriptive analysis: past, present and future. Food Research International 2001, 34:461-471.
41. Murtagh F. Correspondence analysis and data coding with Java and R 2005, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton.
42. Perrin L., Pagès J. Construction of a product space from the ultra-flash profiling method: Application to ten wines from the Loire Valley. Journal of Sensory Studies 2009, 24:372-395.
43. Perrin L., Symoneaux R., Maître I., Asselin C., Jourjon F., Pagès J. Comparison of three sensory methods for use with the Napping® procedure: Case of ten wines from Loire Valley. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:1-11.
44. Puyares V., Ares G., Carray F. Searching a specific bottle for Tannat wine using a check-all-that apply question and conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:684-691.
45. Quarmby A.R., Ratkowsky D.A. Free-choice flavour and odour profiling of fish spoilage: Does it achieve its objective?. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 1988, 44:89-98.
46. R Development Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
47. Roininen K., Arvola A., Lähteenmäki L. Exploring consumers' perceptions of local food with two different qualitative techniques: Laddering and word association. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:20-30.
48. Sieffermann J.M. Le profil Flash: Un outil rapide et innovant d'évaluation sensorielle descriptive. AGORAL Douzièmes rencontres L'innovation: de l'idée au succè 2000, 335-340. Lavoisier, Paris.
49. Šilic A., Morin A., Chauchat J.H., Dalbelo Bašic B. Visualization of temporal text collections based on correspondence analysis. Expert Systems with Applications 2012, 39:12143-12157.
50. Simeone M., Marotta G. Towards an integration of sensory research and marketing in new food products development: A theoretical and methodological review. African Journal of Business Management 2010, 4:4207-4216.
51. Solgaard H.S., Yang Y. Consumers' perception of farmed fish and willingness to pay for fish welfare. British Food Journal 2011, 113:997-1010.
52. Stepanek, J. (2006). Musical sound timbre: Verbal description and dimensions. In Proceedings of the international conference on digital audio effects (DAFx-06) (pp. 121-126.). Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
53. Strigler F., Touraille C., Sauvageot F., Barthélémy J., Issanchou S., Pagès J. Les épreuves discriminatives et descriptives. Evaluation sensorielle. Manuel méthodologique 2009, 99-197. Lavoisier, Paris. F. Depledt (Ed.).
54. Symoneaux R., Galmarini M.V., Mehinagic E. Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping. A case study on apples. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 24:59-66.
55. Ten Kleij F., Musters P.A.D. Text analysis of open-ended survey responses: A complementary method to preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:43-52.
56. Thamke I., Dürrschmid K., Rohm H. Sensory description of dark chocolates by consumers. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2009, 42:534-539.
57. Thompson D.M.H., Crocker C. A data-driven classification of feelings. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 27:137-152.
58. Tournier C., Martin C., Guichard E., Issanchou S., Sulmont-Rossé C. Contribution to the understanding of consumers' creaminess concept: A sensory and a verbal approach. International Dairy Journal 2007, 17:555-564.
59. Valentin D., Chollet S., Lelièvre M., Abdi H. Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 2012, 47:1563-1578.
60. Van Kleef E., van Trijp H., Luning P. Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:181-201.
61. Varela P., Ares G. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Research International 2012, 48:893-908.
62. Veinand B., Godefroy C., Adam C., Delarue J. Highlight of important product characteristics for consumers. Comparison of three sensory descriptive methods performed by consumers. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:474-485.
63. Vijay K.R., Raghavan I. Journal of food science and technology: A bibliometric study. Annals of Library and Information Studies 2007, 54:207-212.
64. Williams A.A., Langron S.P. The use of free choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 1984, 35:558-568.
65. Worch T., Lê S., Punter P. How reliable are the consumers? Comparison of sensory profiles from consumers and experts. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:309-318.