Determination of ubiquitin fitness landscapes under different chemical stresses in a classroom setting

eLife

Volumn 5, Issue MAY2016, 2016, Pages

  Mavor, David ^a   Barlow, Kyle ^a   Thompson, Samuel ^a   Barad, Benjamin A ^a   Bonny, Alain R ^a   Cario, Clinton L ^a   Gaskins, Garrett ^a   Liu, Zairan ^a   Deming, Laura ^a   Axen, Seth D ^a   Caceres, Elena ^a   Chen, Weilin ^a   Cuesta, Adolfo ^a   Gate, Rachel E ^a   Green, Evan M ^a   Hulce, Kaitlin R ^a   Ji, Weiyue ^a   Kenner, Lillian R ^a   Mensa, Bruk ^a   Morinishi, Leanna S ^a   Moss, Steven M ^a   Mravic, Marco ^a   Muir, Ryan K ^a   Niekamp, Stefan ^a   Nnadi, Chimno I ^a   Palovcak, Eugene ^a   Poss, Erin M ^a   Ross, Tyler D ^a   Salcedo, Eugenia C ^a   See, Stephanie K ^a   Subramaniam, Meena ^a   Wong, Allison W ^a   Li, Jennifer ^a   Thorn, Kurt S ^b   Conchúir, Shane Ó ^a   Roscoe, Benjamin P ^c   Chow, Eric D ^a,b   Derisi, Joseph L ^a,b   Kortemme, Tanja ^a   Bolon, Daniel N ^c   Fraser, James S ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTOR PROTEIN; CAFFEINE; HYDROXYUREA; PLASMID DNA; PROTEASOME; PROTEASOME INHIBITOR; UBIQUITIN; MUTANT PROTEIN;

ALLELE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRESS; DNA EXTRACTION; ELECTROPORATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOMICS; GRADUATE STUDENT; GROWTH RATE; H68Y GENE; LYS11 GENE; LYS63 GENE; MUTANT; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; OPEN READING FRAME; OPTICAL DENSITY; PLASMID; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; YEAST; BIOLOGY; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

BIOLOGY; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MUTANT PROTEINS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; STUDENTS; UBIQUITIN; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84971636054     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.15802     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Balch WE, Morimoto RI, Dillin A, Kelly JW. 2008. Adapting proteostasis for disease intervention. Science 319: 916-919. doi: 10.1126/science.1141448
2. Benatuil L, Perez JM, Belk J, Hsieh CM. 2010. An improved yeast transformation method for the generation of very large human antibody libraries. Protein Engineering, Design & Selection 23:155-159. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzq002
3. Boucher JI, Cote P, Flynn J, Jiang L, Laban A, Mishra P, Roscoe BP, Bolon DN. 2014. Viewing protein fitness landscapes through a next-gen lens. Genetics 198:461-471. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.168351
4. Erpapazoglou Z, Walker O, Haguenauer-Tsapis, R. 2014. Versatile roles of k63-linked ubiquitin chains in trafficking. Cells 33:1027-1088. doi: 10.3390/cells3041027
5. Finley D, Ozkaynak E, Varshavsky A. 1987. The yeast polyubiquitin gene is essential for resistance to high temperatures, starvation, and other stresses. Cell 48:1035-1046. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90711-2
6. Finley D, Sadis S, Monia BP, Boucher P, Ecker DJ, Crooke, ST, Chau V. 1994. Inhibition of proteolysis and cell cycle progression in a multiubiquitination-deficient yeast mutant. Molecular and Cellular Biology 14:5501-5509. doi: 10.1128/MCB.14.8.5501
7. Finley D, Ulrich HD, Sommer T, Kaiser P. 2012. The ubiquitin-proteasome system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 192:319-360. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.140467
8. Fowler DM, Stephany JJ, Fields S. 2014. Measuring the activity of protein variants on a large scale using deep mutational scanning. Nature Protocols 9:2267-2284. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.153
9. Frand AR, Kaiser CA. 1998. The ERO1 gene of yeast is required for oxidation of protein dithiols in the endoplasmic reticulum. Molecular Cell 11:161-170. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80017-9
10. Friedlander R, Jarosch E, Urban J, Volkwein C, Sommer T. 2000. A regulatory link between er-associated protein degradation and the unfolded-protein response. Nature Cell Biology 2:379-384. doi: 10.1038/35017001
11. Fujiwara K, Tenno T, Sugasawa K, Jee JG, Ohki I, Kojima C, Tochio H, Hiroaki H, Hanaoka F, Shirakawa M. 2004. Structure of the ubiquitin-interacting motif of S5a bound to the ubiquitin-like domain of HR23B. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 279:4760-4767. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309448200
12. Gardner RG, Nelson ZW, Gottschling DE. 2005. Degradation-mediated protein quality control in the nucleus. Cell 120:803-815. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.016
13. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, Botstein D, Brown PO. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Molecular Biology of the Cell 11: 4241-4257. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.12.4241
14. Gietz RD, Woods RA. 2002. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods in Enzymology 350 350:87-96. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(02)50957-5
15. Hanna J, Leggett DS, Finley D. 2003. Ubiquitin depletion as a key mediator of toxicity by translational inhibitors. Molecular and Cellular Biology 23:9251-9261. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.24.9251-9261.2003
16. Hanna J, Meides A, Zhang DP, Finley D. 2007. A ubiquitin stress response induces altered proteasome composition. Cell 129:747-759. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.042
17. Hietpas R, Roscoe B, Jiang L, Bolon DN. 2012. Fitness analyses of all possible point mutations for regions of genes in yeast. Nature Protocols 7:1382-1396. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.069
18. Hietpas RT, Bank C, Jensen JD, Bolon DN. 2013. Shifting fitness landscapes in response to altered environments. Evolution 67:3512-3522. doi: 10.1111/evo.12207
19. Ibarra-Molero B, Loladze VV, Makhatadze GI, Sanchez-Ruiz JM. 1999. Thermal versus guanidine-induced unfolding of ubiquitin. An analysis in terms of the contributions from charge-charge interactions to protein stability. Biochemistry 38:8138-8149. doi: 10.1021/bi9905819
20. Jensen TJ, Loo MA, Pind S, Williams DB, Goldberg AL, Riordan JR. 1995. Multiple proteolytic systems, including the proteasome, contribute to CFTR processing. Cell 83:129-135. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90241-4
21. Jiang L, Mishra P, Hietpas RT, Zeldovich KB, Bolon DN. 2013. Latent effects of Hsp90 mutants revealed at reduced expression levels. PLoS Genetics 9:e1003600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003600
22. Kellogg EH, Leaver-Fay A, Baker D. 2011. Role of conformational sampling in computing mutation-induced changes in protein structure and stability. Proteins 79:830-838. doi: 10.1002/prot.22921
23. Kimura Y, Yashiroda H, Kudo T, Koitabashi S, Murata S, Kakizuka A, Tanaka K. 2009. An inhibitor of a deubiquitinating enzyme regulates ubiquitin homeostasis. Cell 137:549-559. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.028
24. Koc¸ A, Wheeler LJ, Mathews CK, Merrill GF. 2004. Hydroxyurea arrests DNA replication by a mechanism that preserves basal dNTP pools. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 279:223-230. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303952200
25. Komander D, Rape M. 2012. The ubiquitin code. Annual Review of Biochemistry 81:203-229. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328
26. Kortemme T, Baker D. 2002. A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99:14116-14121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202485799
27. Lange OF, Lakomek NA, Farè s C, Schröder GF, Walter KF, Becker S, Meiler J, Grubmüller H, Griesinger C, de Groot BL. 2008. Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. Science 320:1471-1475. doi: 10.1126/science.1157092
28. Lee DH, Goldberg AL. 1996. Selective inhibitors of the proteasome-dependent and vacuolar pathways of protein degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 271:27280-27284. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.44.27280
29. Lee C, Schwartz MP, Prakash S, Iwakura M, Matouschek A. 2001. ATP-dependent proteases degrade their substrates by processively unraveling them from the degradation signal. Molecular Cell 7:627-637. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00209-X
30. Lee SY, Pullen L, Virgil DJ, Castañeda CA, Abeykoon D, Bolon DN, Fushman D, Castaneda, C.A. 2014. Alanine scan of core positions in ubiquitin reveals links between dynamics, stability, and function. Journal of Molecular Biology 426:1377-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.10.042
31. Lindquist SL, Kelly JW. 2011. Chemical and biological approaches for adapting proteostasis to ameliorate protein misfolding and aggregation diseases: progress and prognosis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 3. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004507
32. Liu Z, Gong Z, Jiang W-X, Yang J, Zhu W-K, Guo D-C, Zhang W-P, Liu M-L, Tang C, Jiang WX, Zhu WK, Guo DC, Zhang WP, Liu ML. 2015. Lys63-linked ubiquitin chain adopts multiple conformational states for specific target recognition. eLife 4:e05767. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05767
33. Peng J, Schwartz D, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Cheng D, Marsischky G, Roelofs J, Finley D, Gygi SP. 2003. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nature Biotechnology 21:921-926. doi: 10.1038/nbt849
34. Petermann E, Orta ML, Issaeva N, Schultz N, Helleday T. 2010. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Molecular Cell 37:492-502. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.021
35. Phillips AH, Zhang Y, Cunningham CN, Zhou L, Forrest WF, Liu PS, Steffek M, Lee J, Tam C, Helgason E, Murray JM, Kirkpatrick DS, Fairbrother WJ, Corn JE. 2013. Conformational dynamics control ubiquitin-deubiquitinase interactions and influence in vivo signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americ 110:11379-11384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302407110
36. Powers ET, Morimoto RI, Dillin A, Kelly JW, Balch WE. 2009. Biological and chemical approaches to diseases of proteostasis deficiency. Annual Review of Biochemistry 78:959-991. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.114844
37. Prakash S, Tian L, Ratliff KS, Lehotzky RE, Matouschek A. 2004. An unstructured initiation site is required for efficient proteasome-mediated degradation. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 11:830-837. doi: 10.1038/nsmb814
38. Reinke A, Chen JC, Aronova S, Powers T. 2006. Caffeine targets TOR complex I and provides evidence for a regulatory link between the FRB and kinase domains of Tor1p. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 281:31616-31626. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603107200
39. Rock KL, Gramm C, Rothstein L, Clark K, Stein R, Dick L, Hwang D, Goldberg AL. 1994. Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules. Cell 78:761-771. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(94)90462-6
40. Rockah-Shmuel L, Tóth-Petróczy Á, Tawfik DS, Toth-Petroczy, A. 2015. Systematic mapping of protein mutational space by prolonged drift reveals the deleterious effects of seemingly neutral mutations. PLoS Computational Biology 11:e1004421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004421
41. Roscoe BP, Thayer KM, Zeldovich KB, Fushman D, Bolon DN. 2013. Analyses of the effects of all ubiquitin point mutants on yeast growth rate. Journal of Molecular Biology 425:1363-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.01.032
42. Roscoe BP, Bolon DN. 2014. Systematic exploration of ubiquitin sequence, E1 activation efficiency, and experimental fitness in yeast. Journal of Molecular Biology 426:2854-2870. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.05.019
43. Shabek N, Iwai K, Ciechanover A. 2007. Ubiquitin is degraded by the ubiquitin system as a monomer and as part of its conjugated target. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 363:425-431. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.08.185
44. Sharp PM, Li WH. 1987. Ubiquitin genes as a paradigm of concerted evolution of tandem repeats. Journal of Molecular Evolution 25:58-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02100041
45. Sloper-Mould KE, Jemc JC, Pickart CM, Hicke L. 2001. Distinct functional surface regions on ubiquitin. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:30483-30489. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103248200
46. Stockwell BR. 2000. Chemical genetics: ligand-based discovery of gene function. Nature Reviews Genetics 1: 116-125. doi: 10.1038/35038557
47. Thrower JS, Hoffman L, Rechsteiner M, Pickart CM. 2000. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. The EMBO Journal 19:94-102. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.1.94
48. Vale RD, DeRisi J, Phillips R, Mullins RD, Waterman C, Mitchison TJ. 2012. Graduate education. Interdisciplinary graduate training in teaching labs. Science 338:1542-1543. doi: 10.1126/science.1216570
49. Wanke V, Cameroni E, Uotila A, Piccolis M, Urban J, Loewith R, De Virgilio C. 2008. Caffeine extends yeast lifespan by targeting TORC1. Molecular Microbiology 69:277-285. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06292.x
50. Wintrode PL, Makhatadze GI, Privalov PL. 1994. Thermodynamics of ubiquitin unfolding. Proteins 18:246-253. doi: 10.1002/prot.340180305
51. Xu P, Duong DM, Seyfried NT, Cheng D, Xie Y, Robert J, Rush J, Hochstrasser M, Finley D, Peng J, Xu P, Xie Y. 2009. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell 137:133-145. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.041
52. Zhang W, Qin Z, Zhang X, Xiao W. 2011. Roles of sequential ubiquitination of PCNA in DNA-damage tolerance. FEBS Letters 585:2786-2794. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.044
53. Zolk O, Schenke C, Sarikas A. 2006. The ubiquitin-proteasome system: focus on the heart. Cardiovascular Research 70:410-421. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.12.021
54. Zuin A, Isasa M, Crosas B. 2014. Ubiquitin signaling: extreme conservation as a source of diversity. Cells 3:690-701. doi: 10.3390/cells3030690