An unstructured initiation site is required for efficient proteasome-mediated degradation

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 830-837

  Prakash, Sumit ^a   Tian, Lin ^a   Ratliff, Kevin S ^a   Lehotzky, Rebecca E ^a   Matouschek, Andreas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYUBIQUITIN; PROTEASOME;

ARTICLE; COVALENT BOND; CYTOSOL; EUKARYOTIC CELL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN TARGETING;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ANIMALS; BACILLUS; BINDING SITES; CATALYSIS; CELL NUCLEUS; CYSTEINE ENDOPEPTIDASES; CYTOSOL; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; ENDOPEPTIDASES; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROLYSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIENZYME COMPLEXES; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RABBITS; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; UBIQUITIN;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 4344559454     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb814     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Glickman, M.H. & Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol. Rev. 82, 373-428 (2002).
2. Baumeister, W., Walz, J., Zühl, F. & Seemüller, E. The proteasome: paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease. Cell 92, 367-380 (1998).
3. Groll, M. et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 Å resolution. Nature 386, 463-471 (1997).
4. Groll, M. et al. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 1062-1067 (2000).
5. Wenzel, T. & Baumeister, W. Conformational constraints in protein degradation by the 20S proteasome. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 199-204 (1995).
6. Johnston, J.A., Johnson, E.S., Waller, P.R.H. & Varshavsky, A. Methotrexate inhibits proteolysis of dihydrofolate reductase by the N-end rule pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 8172-8178 (1995).
7. Deveraux, Q., Ustrell, V., Pickart, C. & Rechsteiner, M. A 26S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7059-7061 (1994).
8. Lam, Y.A., Lawson, T.G., Velayutham, M., Zweier, J.L. & Pickart, C.M. A proteasomal ATPase subunit recognizes the polyubiquitin degradation signal. Nature 416, 763-767 (2002).
9. Braun, B.C. et al. The base of the proteasome regulatory particle exhibits chaperone-like activity. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 221-226 (1999).
10. Lee, C., Schwartz, M.P., Prakash, S., Iwakura, M. & Matouschek, A. ATP-dependent proteases degrade their substrates by processively unraveling them from the degradation signal. Mol. Cell 7, 627-637 (2001).
11. + degradation machine. Cell 114, 511-520 (2003).
12. Breitschopf, K., Bengal, E., Ziv, T., Admon, A. & Ciechanover, A. A novel site for ubiquitination: the N-terminal residue, and not internal lysines of MyoD, is essential for conjugation and degradation of the protein. EMBO J. 17, 5964-5973 (1998).
13. Pickart, C.M. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 503-533 (2001).
14. Thrower, J.S., Hoffman, L., Rechsteiner, M. & Pickart, C.M. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J. 19, 94-102 (2000).
15. Verma, R. et al. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 298, 611-615 (2002).
16. Petroski, M.D. & Deshaies, R.J. Context of multiubiquitin chain attachment influences the rate of Sic1 degradation. Mol. Cell 11, 1435-1444 (2003).
17. Hoskins, J.R., Yanagihara, K., Mizuuchi, K. & Wickner, S. CIpAP and CIpXP degrade proteins with tags located in the interior of the primary sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11037-11042 (2002).
18. Kihara, A., Akiyama, Y. & Ito, K. Dislocation of membrane proteins in FtsH-mediated proteolysis. EMBO J. 18, 2970-2981 (1999).
19. Reid, B.G., Fenton, W.A., Norwich, A.L. & Weber-Ban, E.U. CIpA mediates directional translocation of the substrate proteins into the CIpP protease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3768-3772 (2001).
20. Herman, C., Prakash, S., Lu, C.Z., Matouschek, A. & Gross, C.A. Lack of a robust unfoldase activity confers a unique level of substrate specificity to the universal AAA protease FtsH. Mol. Cell 11, 659-669 (2003).
21. Bachmair, A., Finley, D. & Varshavsky, A. In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science 234, 179-186 (1986).
22. Orian, A. et al. Structural motifs involved in ubiquitin-mediated processing of the NF-κB precursor p105: roles of the glycine-rich region and a downstream ubiquitination domain. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 3664-3673 (1999).
23. Orlowski, M. & Wilk, S. Ubiquitin-independent proteolytic functions of the proteasome. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 415, 1-5 (2003).
24. Flynn, J.M., Neher, S.B., Kim, Y.I., Sauer, R.T. & Baker, T.A. Proteomic discovery of cellular substrates of the CIpXP protease reveals five classes of CIpX-recognition signals. Mol. Cell 11, 671-683 (2003).
25. Uversky, V.N. What does it mean to be natively unfolded? Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 2-12 (2002).
26. Viitanen, P.V., Donaldson, G.K., Lorimer, G.H., Lubben, T.H. & Gatenby, A.A. Complex interactions between the chaperonin 60 molecular chaperone and dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry 30, 9716-9723 (1991).
27. Bachmair, A. & Varshavsky, A. The degradation signal in a short-lived protein. Cell 56, 1019-1032 (1989).
28. Stack, J.H., Whitney, M., Rodems, S.M. & Pollok, B.A. A ubiquitin-based tagging system for controlled modulation of protein stability. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 1298-1302 (2000).
29. Liu, C.W., Corboy, M.J., DeMartino, G.N. & Thomas, P.J. Endoproteolytic activity of the proteasome. Science 299, 408-411 (2003).
30. Peng, J. et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 921-926 (2003).
31. Scherer, D.C., Brockman, J.A., Chen, Z., Maniatis, T. & Ballard, D.W. Signal-induced degradation of IkBa requires site-specific ubiquitination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 11259-11263 (1995).
32. Glotzer, M., Murray, A.W. & Kirschner, M.W. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature 349, 132-138 (1991).
33. Rodriguez, M.S., Desterro, J.M., Lain, S., Lane, D.P. & Hay, R.T. Multiple C-terminal lysine residues target p53 for ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 8458-8467 (2000).
34. Hoppe, T. et al. Activation of a membrane-bound transcription factor by regulated ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent processing. Cell 102, 577-586 (2000).
35. Delagoutte, E. & von Hippel, P.H. Helicase mechanisms and the coupling of helicases within macromolecular machines. Part I: Structures and properties of isolated helicases. Q. Rev. Biophys. 35, 431-478 (2002).
36. Tsu, C.A., Kossen, K. & Uhlenbeck, O.C. The Escherichia coli DEAD protein DbpA recognizes a small RNA hairpin in 23S rRNA. RNA 7, 702-709 (2001).
37. Levchenko, I., Seidel, M., Sauer, R.T. & Baker, T.A. A specificity-enhancing factor for the CIpXP degradation machine. Science 289, 2354-2356 (2000).
38. Neher, S.B., Sauer, R.T. & Baker, T.A. Distinct peptide signals in the UmuD and UmuD' subunits of UmuD/D' mediate tethering and substrate processing by the CIpXP protease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13219-13224 (2003).
39. Elsasser, S. et al. Proteasome subunit Rpn1 binds ubiquitin-like protein domains. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 725-730 (2002).
40. Alberti, S. et al. Ubiquitylation of BAG-1 suggests a novel regulatory mechanism during the sorting of chaperone substrates to the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 45920-45927 (2002).
41. Rao, H. & Sastry, A. Recognition of specific ubiquitin conjugates is important for the proteolytic functions of the ubiquitin-associated domain proteins Dsk2 and Rad23. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 11691-11695 (2002).
42. Raasi, S. & Pickart, C.M. Rad23 ubiquitin-associated domains (UBA) inhibit 26S proteasome-catalyzed proteolysis by sequestering lysine 48-linked polyubiquitin chains. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 8951-8959 (2003).
43. Kleijnen, M.F., Alarcon, R.M. & Howley, P.M. The ubiquitin-associated domain of hPLIC-2 interacts with the proteasome. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 3868-3875 (2003).
44. Bateman, A. et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (Database issue), D138-D141 (2004).
45. Dai, R.M., Chen, E., Longo, D.L., Gorbea, C.M. & Li, C.C. Involvement of valosin-containing protein, an ATPase co-purified with IκBα and 26 S proteasome, in ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation of IκBα. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3562-3573 (1998).
46. Lam, Y.A., Xu, W., DeMartino, G.N. & Cohen, R.E. Editing of ubiquitin conjugates by an isopeptidase in the 26S proteasome. Nature 385, 737-740 (1997).
47. Leggett, D.S. et al. Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol. Cell 10, 495-507 (2002).
48. Hartley, R.W. A two state conformational transition of the extracellular ribonuclease of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (barnase) induced by sodium dodecyl sulfate. Biochemistry 14, 2367-2370 (1975).
49. Rood, J.I., Laird, A.J. & Williams, J.W. Cloning of the Escherichia coli K-12 dihydrofolate reductase gene following mu-mediated transposition. Gene 8, 255-265 (1980).
50. Iwakura, M., Nakamura, T., Yamane, C. & Maki, K. Systematic circular permutation of an entire protein reveals essential folding elements. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 580-585 (2000).
51. Varshavsky, A. The N-end rule. Cell 69, 725-735 (1992).
52. Matouschek, A. et al. Active unfolding of precursor proteins during mitochondrial protein import. EMBO J. 16, 6727-6736 (1997).
53. Gonda, D.K. et al. Universality and structure of the N-end rule. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 16700-16712 (1989).
54. Larsen, C.N. & Finley, D. Protein translocation channels in the proteasome and other proteases. Cell 91, 431-434 (1997).