Does 3D phenotyping yield substantial insights in the genetics of the mouse mandible shape?

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1153-1163

  Navarro, Nicolas ^a   Maga, A Murat ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ BOURGOGNE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c SEATTLE CHILDREN S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

3D geometric morphometrics; Mandible shape; Multivariate QTL mapping; Mus musculus

Indexed keywords

ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; DIGITAL IMAGING; GENOTYPE; MANDIBLE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ALGORITHM; ANATOMIC MODEL; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; MICE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 84966351267     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.115.024372     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Adams, D. C., 2014 A method for assessing phylogenetic least squares models for shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. Evolution 68: 2675-2688.
2. Aguirre, J. D., E. Hine, K. McGuigan, and M. W. Blows, 2013 Comparing G: multivariate analysis of genetic variation in multiple populations. Heredity 112: 21-29.
3. Anderson, P. S., S. Renaud, and E. J. Rayfield, 2014 Adaptive plasticity in the mouse mandible. BMC Evol. Biol. 14: 85.
4. Andolfatto, P., D. Davison, D. Erezyilmaz, T. T. Hu, J. Mast et al., 2011 Multiplexed shotgun genotyping for rapid and efficient genetic mapping. Genome Res. 21: 610-617.
5. Aneja, D., S. R. Vora, E. D. Camci, L. G. Shapiro, and T. C. Cox, 2015 Automated Detection of 3D Landmarks for the Elimination of Non-Biological Variation in Geometric Morphometric Analyses. 28th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (22-25 June São Carlos, Brazil).
6. Atchley, W. R., and B. K. Hall, 1991 A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 66: 101-157.
7. Atchley, W. R., A. A. Plummer, and B. Riska, 1985 Genetics of mandible form in the mouse. Genetics 111: 555-577.
8. Baird, N. A., P. D. Etter, T. S. Atwood, M. C. Currey, A. L. Shiver et al., 2008 Rapid SNP Discovery and Genetic Mapping Using Sequenced RAD Markers. PLoS One 3: e3376-e3377.
9. Boell, L., 2013 Lines of least resistance and genetic architecture of house mouse (Mus musculus) mandible shape. Evol. Dev. 15: 197-204.
10. Boell, L., and D. Tautz, 2011 Micro-evolutionary divergence patterns of mandible shapes in wild house mouse (Mus musculus) populations. BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 306.
11. Boell, L., S. Gregorova, J. Forejt, and D. Tautz, 2011 A comparative assessment of mandible shape in a consomic strain panel of the house mouse (Mus musculus)-implications for epistasis and evolvability of quantitative traits. BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 309.
12. Boell, L., L. F. Pallares, C. Brodski, Y. Chen, J. L. Christian et al., 2013 Exploring the effects of gene dosage on mandible shape in mice as a model for studying the genetic basis of natural variation. Dev. Genes Evol. 223: 279-287.
13. Bookstein, F. L., 1997 Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med. Image Anal. 1: 225-243.
14. Broman, K. W., and S. Sen, 2009 A Guide to QTL Mapping with R/qtl, Springer, New York.
15. Broman, K. W., and T. P. Speed, 2002 A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 64: 641-656.
16. Broman, K. W., H. Wu, S. Sen, and G. A. Churchill, 2003 R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19: 889-890.
17. Bromiley, P. A., A. C. Schunke, H. Ragheb, N. A. Thacker, and D. Tautz, 2014 Semi-automatic landmark point annotation for geometric morphometrics. Front. Zool. 11: 61.
18. Cande, J., P. Andolfatto, B. Prud'homme, D. L. Stern, and N. Gompel, 2012 Evolution of multiple additive loci caused divergence between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea in wing rowing during male courtship. PLoS One 7: e43888.
19. Cardini, A., 2014 Missing the third dimension in geometric morphometrics: how to assess if 2D images really are a good proxy for 3D structures? Hystrix 25: 73-81.
20. Chevalier, F., C. L. Valentim, P. T. LoVerde, and T. J. Anderson, 2014 Efficient linkage mapping using exome capture and extreme QTL in schistosome parasites. BMC Genomics 15: 617.
21. Churchill, G. A., and R. W. Doerge, 1994 Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138: 963-971.
22. Collyer, M. L., D. J. Sekora, and D. C. Adams, 2015 A method for analysis of phenotypic change for phenotypes described by high-dimensional data. Heredity 115: 357-365.
23. Cox, A., C. L. Ackert-Bicknell, B. L. Dumont, Y. Ding, J. T. Bell et al., 2009 A new standard genetic map for the laboratory mouse. Genetics 182: 1335-1344.
24. Debat, V., A. Debelle, and I. Dworkin, 2009 Plasticity, canalization, and developmental stability of the Drosophila wing: joint effects of mutations and developmental temperature. Evolution 63: 2864-2876.
25. Drake, A. G., and C. P. Klingenberg, 2008 The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St Bernard dogs. Proc. Biol. Sci. 275: 71-76.
26. Dryden, I. L., and K. V. Mardia, 1998 Statistical Shape Analysis, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.
27. Dryden, I. L., A. Koloydenko, and D. Zhou, 2009 Non-Euclidean statistics for covariance matrices, with applications to diffusion tensor imaging. Ann. Appl. Stat. 3: 1102-1123.
28. Dupuis, J., and D. Siegmund, 1999 Statistical methods for mapping quantitative trait loci from a dense set of markers. Genetics 151: 373-386.
29. Dworkin, I., J. A. Anderson, Y. Idaghdour, E. K. Parker, E. A. Stone et al., 2011 The effects of weak genetic perturbations on the transcriptome of the wing imaginal disc and its association with wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 187: 1171-1184.
30. Elshire, R. J., J. C. Glaubitz, Q. Sun, J. A. Poland, K. Kawamoto et al., 2011 A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6: e19379.
31. Emília Santos, M., C. S. Berger, P. N. Refki, and A. Khila, 2015 Integrating evo-devo with ecology for a better understanding of phenotypic evolution. Brief. Funct. Genomics 2015: 1-12.
32. Fedorov, A., R. Beichel, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, J. Finet, J.-C. Fillion-Robin et al., 2012 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30: 1323-1341.
33. Flint, J., and E. Eskin, 2012 Genome-wide association studies in mice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13: 807-817.
34. Franchini, P., C. Fruciano, M. L. Spreitzer, J. C. Jones, K. R. Elmer et al., 2013 Genomic architecture of ecologically divergent body shape in a pair of sympatric crater lake cichlid fishes. Mol. Ecol. 23: 1828-1845.
35. Galesloot, T. E., K. van Steen, L. A. L. M. Kiemeney, L. L. Janss, and S. H. Vermeulen, 2014 A Comparison of multivariate genome-wide association methods. PLoS One 9: e95923-e95928.
36. Gao, H., T. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Wu, L. Jiang et al., 2014 Multiple-trait genome-wide association study based on principal component analysis for residual covariance matrix. Heredity 113: 526-532.
37. Gnirke, A., A. Melnikov, J. Maguire, P. Rogov, E. M. LeProust et al., 2009 Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 27: 182-189.
38. Goodall, C., 1991 Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 53: 285-339.
39. Gray, M. M., M. D. Parmenter, C. A. Hogan, I. Ford, R. J. Cuthbert et al., 2015 Genetics of rapid and extreme size evolution in island mice. Genetics 201: 213-228.
40. Gunz, P., and P. Mitteroecker, 2013 Semilandmarks: a method for quantifying curves and surfaces. Hystrix 24: 103-109.
41. Gunz, P., P. Mitteroecker, and F. L. Bookstein, 2005 Semilandmarks in three dimensions, pp. 73-98 in Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology, edited by Slice, D. E. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
42. Guo, J., X. Mei, and K. Tang, 2013 Automatic landmark annotation and dense correspondence registration for 3D human facial images. BMC Bioinformatics 14: 232.
43. Hallgrímsson, B., W. Mio, R. S. Marcucio, and R. Spritz, 2014 Let's face it-complex traits are just not that simple. PLoS Genet. 10: e1004724.
44. Healy, M. J. R., 1969 Rao's paradox concerning multivariate tests of significance. Biometrics 25: 411-413.
45. Hodges, E., Z. Xuan, V. Balija, M. Kramer, M. N. Molla et al., 2007 Genome-wide in situ exon capture for selective resequencing. Nat. Genet. 39: 1522-1527.
46. Houle, D., D. R. Govindaraju, and S. Omholt, 2010 Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 855-866.
47. Huang, X., Q. Feng, Q. Qian, Q. Zhao, L. Wang et al., 2009 High-throughput genotyping by whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res. 19: 1068-1076.
48. Huber, B., A. Whibley, Y. L. Poul, N. Navarro, A. Martin et al., 2015 Conservatism and novelty in the genetic architecture of adaptation in Heliconius butterflies. Heredity 114: 515-524.
49. Jones, M. R., and J. M. Good, 2016 Targeted capture in evolutionary and ecological genomics. Mol. Ecol. 25: 185-202.
50. Khila, A., E. Abouheif, and L. Rowe, 2009 Evolution of a novel appendage ground plan in water striders is driven by changes in the Hox gene Ultrabithorax. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000583-e1000589.
51. Klingenberg, C. P., 2010 Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 623-635.
52. Klingenberg, C. P., and N. A. Gidaszewski, 2010 Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Syst. Biol. 59: 245-261.
53. Klingenberg, C. P., and L. J. Leamy, 2001 Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 55: 2342-2352.
54. Klingenberg, C. P., and N. Navarro, 2012 Development of the mouse mandible: a model system for complex morphological structures, pp. 135-149 in Evolution of the House Mouse, edited by Macholán, M., S. J. E. Baird, and J. Pialek. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
55. Klingenberg, C. P., L. J. Leamy, E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud, 2001 Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics. Genetics 157: 785-802.
56. Klingenberg, C. P., L. J. Leamy, and J. M. Cheverud, 2004 Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 166: 1909-1921.
57. Krzanowski, W. J., 1979 Between-Groups Comparison of Principal Components. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74: 703-707.
58. Kwak, I.-Y., C. R. Moore, E. P. Spalding, and K. W. Broman, 2014 A simple regression-based method to map quantitative trait loci underlying function-valued phenotypes. Genetics 197: 1409-1416.
59. Langlade, N. B., X. Feng, T. Dransfield, L. Copsey, A. I. Hanna et al., 2005 Evolution through genetically controlled allometry space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 10221-10226.
60. Leamy, L. J., C. P. Klingenberg, E. Sherratt, J. B. Wolf, and J. M. Cheverud, 2008 A search for quantitative trait loci exhibiting imprinting effects on mouse mandible size and shape. Heredity 101: 518-526.
61. Ledur, M. C., N. Navarro, and M. Pérez-Enciso, 2009 Large-scale SNP genotyping in crosses between outbred lines: how useful is it? Heredity 105: 173-182.
62. Linnen, C. R., Y.-P. Poh, B. K. Peterson, R. D. H. Barrett, J. G. Larson et al., 2013 Adaptive evolution of multiple traits through multiple mutations at a single gene. Science 339: 1312-1316.
63. Liu, J., W. Gao, S. Huang, and W. L. Nowinski, 2008 A Model-Based, Semi-Global Segmentation Approach for Automatic 3-D Point Landmark Localization in Neuroimages. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 27: 1034-1044.
64. Liu, J., T. Shikano, T. Leinonen, J. M. Cano, M.-H. Li et al., 2014 Identification of major and minor QTL for ecologically important morphological traits in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). G3 (Bethesda) 4: 595-604.
65. Maga, A. M., N. Navarro, M. L. Cunningham, and T. C. Cox, 2015 Quantitative trait loci affecting the 3D skull shape and size in mouse and prioritization of candidate genes in-silico. Front. Physiol. 6: 1-13.
66. Manichaikul, A., J. Dupuis, S. Sen, and K. W. Broman, 2006 Poor performance of bootstrap confidence intervals for the location of a quantitative trait locus. Genetics 174: 481-489.
67. Manichaikul, A., J. Y. Moon, S. Sen, B. S. Yandell, and K. W. Broman, 2009 A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses, allowing epistasis. Genetics 181: 1077-1086.
68. McCane, B., 2013 Shape variation in outline shapes. Syst. Biol. 62: 134-146.
69. Mezey, J. G., D. Houle, and S. V. Nuzhdin, 2005 Naturally segregating quantitative trait loci affecting wing shape of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 169: 2101-2113.
70. Miller, M. R., J. P. Dunham, A. Amores, W. A. Cresko, and E. A. Johnson, 2007 Rapid and cost-effective polymorphism identification and genotyping using restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers. Genome Res. 17: 240-248.
71. Monteiro, L. R., 1999 Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. Syst. Biol. 48: 192-199.
72. Mott, R., and J. Flint, 2013 Dissecting quantitative traits in mice. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 14: 421-439.
73. Muñoz-Muñoz, F., and D. Perpiñan, 2010 Measurement error in morphometric studies: comparison between manual and computerized methods. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 47: 46-56.
74. Navarro, N., 2015 shapeQTL: shape QTL mapping experiment with R. R package version 0.2. https://github.com/nnavarro/shapeQTL. Accessed: January 28, 2016.
75. Navarro, N., and C. P. Klingenberg, 2007 Mapping multiple QTLs of geometric shape of the mouse mandible, pp. 125-128 in Systems Biology Statistical Bioinformatics, edited by Barber, S., P. D. Baxter, and K. V. Mardia, Leeds University Press, Leeds.
76. Olson, C. L., 1974 Comparative Robustness of Six Tests in Multivariate Analysis of Variance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69: 894-908.
77. Olson, C. L., 1976 On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance. Psychol. Bull. 83: 579-586.
78. Olson, M., 2007 Enrichment of super-sized resequencing targets from the human genome. Nat. Methods 4: 891-892.
79. Pallares, L. F., B. Harr, L. M. Turner, and D. Tautz, 2014 Use of a natural hybrid zone for genomewide association mapping of craniofacial traits in the house mouse. Mol. Ecol. 23: 5756-5770.
80. Pallares, L. F., P. Carbonetto, S. Gopalakrishnan, C. C. Parker, C. L. Ackert-Bicknell et al., 2015 Mapping of craniofacial traits in outbred mice identifies major developmental genes involved in shape determination. PLoS Genet. 11: e1005607.
81. Perakis, P., G. Passalis, T. Theoharis, and I. A. Kakadiaris, 2010 3D facial landmark detection&face registration, Tech. Rep., University of Athens, Greece.
82. Perakis, P., T. Theoharis, and I. A. Kakadiaris, 2014 Feature fusion for facial landmark detection. Pattern Recognit. 47: 2783-2793.
83. Percival, C. J., D. K. Liberton, F. Pardo-Manuel de Villena, R. Spritz, R. Marcucio et al., 2016 Genetics of murine craniofacial morphology: diallel analysis of the eight founders of the Collaborative Cross. J. Anat. 228: 96-112.
84. Peterson, B. K., J. N. Weber, E. H. Kay, H. S. Fisher, and H. E. Hoekstra, 2012 Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS One 7: e37135.
85. Prud'homme, B., C. Minervino, M. Hocine, J. D. Cande, A. Aouane et al., 2012 Body plan innovation in treehoppers through the evolution of an extra wing-like appendage. Nature 473: 83-86.
86. R Core Team, 2015 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.
87. Rolfe, S. M., L. G. Shapiro, T. C. Cox, A. M. Maga, and L. L. Cox, 2011 A landmark-free framework for the detection and description of shape differences in embryos. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2011: 5153-5156.
88. Schlager, S., 2015a Morpho: Calculations and visualisations related to Geometric Morphometrics. R-package version 2. 3.0. Available at: https://github.com/zarquon42b/Morpho. Accessed: September 10, 2015
89. Schlager, S., 2015b Rvcg: Manipulations of Triangular Meshes Based on the 'VCGLIB' API. Available at: https://github.com/zarquon42b/Rvcg. Accessed: September 10, 2015
90. Sen, S., and G. A. Churchill, 2001 A statistical framework for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 159: 371-387.
91. Shifman, S., J. T. Bell, R. R. Copley, M. S. Taylor, R. W. Williams et al., 2006 A high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism genetic map of the mouse genome. PLoS Biol. 4: e395.
92. Stephens, M., 2013 A unified framework for association analysis with multiple related phenotypes. PLoS One 8: e65245.
93. Suto, J.-I., 2009 Identification of multiple quantitative trait loci affecting the size and shape of the mandible in mice. Mamm. Genome 20: 1-13.
94. Swiderski, D. L., and M. L. Zelditch, 2013 The complex ontogenetic trajectory of mandibular shape in a laboratory mouse. J. Anat. 223: 568-580.
95. Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell, 2013 Using Multivariate Statistics, Ed. 6th. Pearson Education, Inc, Boston.
96. Teplitsky, C., M. R. Robinson, and J. Merilä, 2014 Evolutionary potential and constraints in wild populations, pp. 190-208 in Quantitative Genetics in the Wild, edited by Charmantier, A., D. Garant, and L. E. B. Kruuk. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
97. Valdar, W., L. C. Solberg, D. Gauguier, S. Burnett, P. Klenerman et al., 2006 Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice. Nat. Genet. 38: 879-887.
98. Workman, M. S., L. J. Leamy, E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud, 2002 Analysis of quantitative trait locus effects on the size and shape of mandibular molars in mice. Genetics 160: 1573-1586.
99. Yalcin, B., J. Nicod, A. Bhomra, S. Davidson, J. Cleak et al., 2010 Commercially available outbred mice for genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 6: e1001085.
100. Yezerinac, S. M., S. C. Lougheed, and P. Handford, 1992 Measurement error and morphometric studies: statistical power and observer experience. Syst. Biol. 41: 471-482.
101. Young, R., and A. M. Maga, 2015 Performance of single and multi-atlas based automated landmarking methods compared to expert annotations in volumetric microCT datasets of mouse mandibles. Front. Zool. 12: 33.
102. Zeng, Z. B., J. Liu, L. F. Stam, C. H. Kao, J. M. Mercer et al., 2000 Genetic architecture of a morphological shape difference between two Drosophila species. Genetics 154: 299-310.