A method for assessing phylogenetic least squares models for shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 2675-2688

  Adams, Dean C ^a,b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Iowa State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Geometric morphometrics; Macroevolution; Morphological evolution; Phylogenetic comparative method

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PHYLOGENETICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; HEAD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; URODELA;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CLASSIFICATION; HEAD; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; URODELA;

EID: 84907996219     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12463     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Ackerly, D. D., and M. J. Donoghue. 1998. Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner's rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). Am. Nat. 152:767-791.
2. Adams, D. C. 1999. Methods for shape analysis of landmark data from articulated structures. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1:959-970.
3. Adams, D. C. 2007. Organization of Plethodon salamander communities: guildbased community assembly. Ecology 88:1292-1299.
4. Adams, D. C. 2010. Parallel evolution of character displacement driven by competitive selection in terrestrial salamanders. BMC Evol. Biol. 10:1-10.
5. Adams, D. C. 2011. Quantitative genetics and evolution of head shape in Plethodon salamanders. Evol. Biol. 38:278-286.
6. Adams, D. C. 2014a. Quantifying and comparing phylogenetic evolutionary rates for shape and other high-dimensional phenotypic data. Syst. Biol. 63:166-177.
7. Adams, D. C. 2014b. A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. Syst. Biol. 63. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu030.
8. Adams, D. C., and J. O. Church. 2008. Amphibians do not follow Bergmann's rule. Evolution 62:413-420.
9. Adams, D. C., and J. O. Church. 2011. The evolution of large-scale body size clines in Plethodon: evidence of heat-balance or species-specific artifact? Ecography 34:1067-1075.
10. Adams, D. C., and R. Felice. 2014. Assessing phylogenetic morphological integration and trait covariation inmorphometric data using evolutionary covariance matrices. PLoS ONE 9:e94335.
11. Adams, D. C., and A. Nistri. 2010. Ontogenetic convergence and evolution of foot morphology in European cave salamanders (Family: Plethodontidae). BMC Evol. Biol. 10:1-10.
12. Adams, D. C., and E. Otárola-Castillo. 2013. geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4:393-399.
13. Adams, D. C., M. E. West, and M. L. Collyer. 2007. Location-specific sympatric morphological divergence as a possible response to species interactions in West Virginia Plethodon salamander communities. J. Anim. Ecol. 76:289-295.
14. Adams, D. C., C. M. Berns, K. H. Kozak, and J. J. Wiens. 2009. Are rates of species diversification correlated with rates of morphological evolution? Proc. Royal Soc. B 276:2729-2738.
15. Adams, D. C., A. Cardini, L. R.Monteiro, P. O'Higgins, and F. J. Rohlf. 2011. Morphometrics and phylogenetics: principal components of shape from cranial modules are neither appropriate nor effective cladistic characters. J. Hum. Evol. 60:240-243.
16. Adams, D. C., F. J. Rohlf, and D. E. Slice. 2013. A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix 24:7-14.
17. Adams, D. C., E. Otárola-Castillo, and E. Sherratt. 2014. Geomorph: software for geometric morphometric analyses. R package version 2.0. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geomorph.
18. Anderson, M. J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral. Ecol. 26:32-46.
19. Arif, S., D. C. Adams, and J. A. Wicknick. 2007. Bioclimatic modelling, morphology, and behaviour reveal alternative mechanisms regulating the distributions of two parapatric salamander species Evol. Ecol. Res. 9:843-854.
20. Bartoszek, K., J. Pienaar, P. Mostad, S. Andersson, and T. F. Hansen. 2012. A phylogenetic comparative method for studying multivariate adaptation. J. Theor. Biol. 314:204-215.
21. Beaulieu, J.M., D.-C. Jhwueng, C. Boettiger, and B. C. O'Meara. 2012. Modeling stabilizing selection: expanding the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model of adaptive evolution. Evolution 66:2369-2383.
22. Bergmann, P. J., J. J.Meyers, and D. J. Irschick. 2009. Directional evolution of stockiness coevolves with ecology and locomotion in lizards. Evolution 63:215-227.
23. Blankers, T., D. C. Adams, and J. J. Wiens. 2012. Ecological radiation with limited morphological diversification in salamanders. J. Evol. Biol. 25:634-646.
24. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
25. Blomberg, S. P., J. G. Lefevre, J. A. Wells, and M. Waterhouse. 2012. Independent contrasts and PGLS regression estimators are equivalent. Syst. Biol. 61:382-391.
26. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
27. Bookstein, F. L. 2013. Random walk as a null model for high-dimensional morphometrics of fossil series: geometrical considerations. Paleobiology 39:52-74.
28. Bookstein, F. L., P. Gunz, P. Mitteroecker, H. Prossinger, K. Schaefer, and H. Seidler. 2003. Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution. J. Hum. Evol. 44:167-187.
29. Brusatte, S. L., M. Sakamoto, S. Montanari, and E. H. Harcourt-Smith. 2012. The evolution of cranial form and function in theropod dinosaurs: insights from geometric morphometrics. J. Evol. Biol. 25:365-377.
30. Butler, M. A., and A. A. King. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am. Nat. 164:683-695.
31. Butler, M. A., T.W. Schoener, and J. B. Losos. 2000. The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution 54:259-272.
32. Cardini, A., and P. D. Polly. 2013. Larger mammals have longer faces because of size-related constraints on skull form. Nature Comm. 2458:1-7.
33. Cheverud, J. M., M. M. Dow, and W. Leutenegger. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight in primates. Evolution 39:1335-1351.
34. Collar, D. C., J. A. Schulte II, B. C. O'Meara, and J. B. Losos. 2010. Habitat use affects morphological diversification in dragon lizards. J. Evol. Biol. 23:1033-1049.
35. de Villemereuil, P., J. A. Wells, R. D. Edwards, and S. P. Blomberg. 2012. Bayesian models for comparative analysis integrating phylogenetic uncertainty. BMC Evol. Biol. 12:1-16.
36. Deitloff, J., J. D. Petersen, and D. C. Adams. 2013. Complex species interactions lead to unpredictable outcomes in Plethodon. Herpetologica 62:1-10.
37. Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., C. E. R. Sant'Ana, and L. Bini. 1998. An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52:1247-1262.
38. Felsenstein, J. 1973. Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 25:471-492.
39. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
40. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:445-471.
41. Felsenstein, J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
42. Garland, T., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41:18-32.
43. Garland, T. J., and A. R. Ives. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155:346-364.
44. Goodall, C. R. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape (with discussion and rejoinder). J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B. 53:285-339.
45. Gould, S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and evolution. Biol. Rev. 41:587-640.
46. Gower, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325-338.
47. Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B. 326:119-157.
48. Guill, J. M., D. C. Heins, and C. S. Hood. 2003. The effect of phylogeny on interspecific body shape variation in darters (Pisces: Percidae). Syst. Biol. 52:488-500.
49. Gunz, P. 2012. Evolutionary relationships among robust and gracile australopiths: an "evodevo" perspective. Evol. Biol. 39:472-487.
50. Hansen, T. F., and E. P. Martins. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50:1404-1417.
51. Harmon, L. J., J. B. Losos, T. J. Davies, R. G. Gillespie, J. L. Gittleman, W. B. Jennings, K. H. Kozak, M. A. McPeek, F. Moreno-Roark, T. J. Near, et al. 2010. Early bursts of body size and shape evolution are rare in comparative data. Evolution 64:2385-2396.
52. Harvey, P. H., and M.D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
53. Healy, M. J. R. 1969. Rao's paradox concerning multivariate tests of significance. Biometrics 25:411-413.
54. Highton, R. 1995. Speciation in eastern North American salamanders of the genus Plethodon. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:579-600.
55. Klingenberg, C. P., and N. A. Gidaszewski. 2010. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Syst. Biol. 59:245-261.
56. Klingenberg, C. P., and J. Marugán-Lobón. 2013. Evolutionary covaration in geometric morphometric data: analyzing integration, modularity, and allometry in a phylogenetic context. Syst. Biol. 62:591-610.
57. Krzanowksi, W. J. 1993. Principles of multivariate analysis. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
58. Lawing, A. M., and P. D. Polly. 2011. Pleistocene climate, phylogeny, and climate envelope models: an integrative approach to better understand species' response to climate change. PLoS ONE 16:e28554.
59. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
60. Losos, J. B. 1990. Ecomorphology, performance capability, and scaling of West Indian Anolis lizards: an evolutionary analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 60:369-388.
61. Maerz, J. C., E. M. Myers, and D. C. Adams. 2006. Trophic polymorphism in a terrestrial salamander. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8:23-35.
62. Martins, E. P., and T. F. Hansen. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149:646-667.
63. McArdle, B. H., and M. J. Anderson. 2001. Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290-297.
64. McPeek, M. A., L. Shen, J. Z. Torrey, and H. Farid. 2008. The tempo and mode of three-dimensional morphological evolution in male reproductive structures. Am. Nat. 171:E158-E178.
65. Mitteroecker, P., P. Gunz, M. Bernhard, K. Schaefer, and F. L. Bookstein. 2004. Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. J. Hum. Evol. 46:679-698.
66. Mitteroecker, P., P. Gunz, S. Windhager, and K. Schaefer. 2013. A brief review of shape, form, and allometry in geometric morphometrics, with applications to human facial morphology. Hystrix 24:59-66.
67. Monteiro, L. R. 2013. Morphometrics and the comparative method: studying the evolution of biological shape. Hystrix 24:25-32.
68. Monteiro, L. R., and M. R. Nogueira. 2010. Adaptive radiations, ecological specialization, and the evolutionary integration of complex morphological structures. Evolution 64:724-744.
69. Monteiro, L. R., and M. R. Nogueira. 2011. Evolutionary patterns and processes in the radiation of phyllostomid bats. BMC Evol. Biol. 11:1-23.
70. Mosimann, J. E. 1970. Size allometry: Size and shape variables with characterizations of the lognormal and generalized gamma distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 65:930-945.
71. Myers, E. M., and D. C. Adams. 2008. Morphology is decoupled from interspecific competition in Plethodon salamanders in the Shenandoah Mountains. Herpetologica 64:281-289.
72. Nogueira, M. R., A. L. Peracchi, and L. R. Monteiro. 2009. Morphological correlates of bite force and diet in the skull and mandible of phyllostomid bats. Func. Ecol. 23:715-723.
73. Olson, C. L. 1974. Comparative robustness of six tests in multivariate analysis of variance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69:894-908.
74. Outomuro, D., D. C. Adams, and F. Johansson. 2013a. Evolution of wing shape in ornamented-winged damselflies. Evol. Biol. 40:300-309.
75. Outomuro, D. 2013b. Wing shape allometry and aerodynamics in calopterygid damselflies: a comparative approach. BMC Evol. Biol. 13:1-11.
76. Pennell, M. W., and L. J. Harmon. 2013. An integrative view of phylogenetic comparative methods: connections to population genetics, community ecology, and paleobiology. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1289:90-105.
77. Piras, P., P. Colangelo, D. C. Adams, A. Buscalioni, J. Cubo, T. Kotsakis, C. Meloro, and P. Raia. 2010. The Gavialis-Tomistoma debate: the contribution of skull ontogenetic allometry and growth trajectories to the study of crocodylian relationships. Evol. Develop. 12:568-579.
78. Piras, P., L.Maiorino, L. Teresi, C.Meloro, F. Lucci, T. Kotsakis, and P. Raia. 2013. Bite of the cats: relationships between functional integration and mechanical performance as revealed by mandible geometry. Syst. Biol. 62:878-900.
79. Polly, P. D., A. M. Lawing, A.-C. Fabre, and A. Goswami. 2013. Phylogenetic principal components analysis and geometric morphometrics. Hystrix 24:1-9.
80. R Development Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.0.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://cran.R-project.org.
81. Rao, C. R. 1966. Covariance adjustmenit and related problems in multivariate analysis. Pp. 87-103 in P. R. Krishnaiah, ed. Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, New York.
82. Rencher, A. C., and W. F. Christensen. 2012. Methods of multivariate analysis. John Wiley&Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
83. Revell, L. J. 2010. Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1:319-329.
84. Revell, L. J., L. J. Harmon, and D. C. Collar. 2008. Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Syst. Biol. 57:591-601.
85. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2160.
86. Rohlf, F. J., and D. E. Slice. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39:40-59.
87. Rüber, L., and D. C. Adams. 2001. Evolutionary convergence of body shape and trophicmorphology in cichlids from Lake Tanganyika. J. Evol. Biol. 14:325-332.
88. Sessions, S. K., and A. Larson. 1987. Developmental correlates of genome size in plethodontid salamanders and their implications for genome evolution. Evolution 41:1239-1251.
89. Sidlauskas, B. 2008. Continuous and arrested morphological diversification in sister clades of characiform fishes: a phylomorphospace approach. Evolution 62:3135-3156.
90. Stevens, J. P. 1980. Power of the multivariate analysis of variance tests. Psych. Bull. 88:728-737.
91. Voje, K. L., T. F. Hansen, C. K. Egset, G. H. Bolstad, and C. Pelabon. 2014. Allometric constraints and the evolution of allometry. Evolution 68:866-885.
92. Wiens, J. J., T. N. Engstrom, and P. T. Chippendale. 2006. Rapid diversification, incomplete isolation, and the 'speciation clock' in North American salamanders (genus: Plethodon): testing the hybrid swarm hypothesis of rapid radiation. Evolution 60:2585-2603.
93. Zapala, M. A., and N. J. Schork. 2006. Multivariate regression analysis of distance matrices for testing associations between gene expression patterns and relative variables. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:19430-19435.