Integrating evo-devo with ecology for a better understanding of phenotypic evolution

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 384-395

  Emilia santos M ^a   Berger, Chloé S ^a   Refki, Peter N ^a   Khila, Abderrahman ^a  

^a Univ Lyon 1   (France)

Author keywords

Evo devo; Evolutionary ecology; Functional genomics; Multidisciplinarity; semi aquatic bugs

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL GENETICS; DIVERSIFYING SELECTION; EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; FEMALE; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC MANIPULATION; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HETEROPTERA; HUMAN; LEG LENGTH; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MATING SUCCESS; MORPHOLOGY; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; POLYPHENISM; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW; SEX RATIO; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TRICHOME; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOLOGY; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84949648886     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elv003     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Darwin C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: J. Murray, 1859.
2. Carroll SB, Grenier JK, Weatherbee SD. From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2001.
3. Grant PR, Grant BR. How and Why Species Multiply: The Radiation of Darwin's Finches. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
4. Schluter D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
5. Haag ES, Lenski RE. L'enfant terrible at 30: the maturation of evolutionary developmental biology. Development 2011;138: 2633-7.
6. Mallarino R, Abzhanov A. Paths less traveled: evo-devo approaches to investigating animal morphological evolution. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2012;28:743-63.
7. Sommer R. The future of evo-devo: model systems and evolutionary theory. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:416-22.
8. Ferrier DEK, Holland PWH. Ancient origin of the Hox gene cluster. Nat Rev Genet 2001;2:33-8.
9. Carroll SB. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 2008; 134:25-36.
10. Stern DL. Evolution, Development, & the Predictable Genome. Greenwood Village: Roberts and Company, 2011.
11. Nunes MDS, Arif S, Schlötterer C, et al. A perspective on micro-evo-devo: progress and potential. Genetics 2013;195: 625-34.
12. Lovell JT, Juenger TE, Michaels SD, et al. Pleiotropy of FRIGIDA enhances the potential for multivariate adaptation. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 2013;280:20131043.
13. Kopp A. Metamodels and phylogenetic replication: a systematic approach to the evolution of developmental pathways. Evolution 2009;63:2771-89.
14. Khila A, Abouheif E, Rowe L. Function, developmental genetics, and fitness consequences of a sexually antagonistic trait. Science 2012;336:585-9.
15. Moczek AP, Rose DJ. Differential recruitment of limb patterning genes during development and diversification of beetle horns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:8992-7.
16. Beldade P, Brakefield PM. The genetics and evo-devo of butterfly wing patterns. Nat Rev Genet 2002;3:442-52.
17. Parsons KJ, Márquez E, Albertson RC. Constraint and opportunity: the genetic basis and evolution of modularity in the cichlid mandible. Am Nat 2012;179:64-78.
18. Marshall CR, Orr H A, Patel NH. Morphological innovation and developmental genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96: 9995-6.
19. Martin A, Reed RD. Wingless and aristaless2 define a developmental ground plan for moth and butterfly wing pattern evolution? Mol Biol Evol 2010;27:2864-78.
20. Khalturin K, Hemmrich G, Fraune S, et al. More than just orphans: are taxonomically-restricted genes important in evolution. Trends Genet 2009;25:404-13.
21. Milde S, Hemmrich G, Anton-Erxleben F, et al. Characterization of taxonomically restricted genes in a phylum- restricted cell type. Genome Biol 2009;10:R8.
22. RaffR. Evo-devo: the evolution of a new discipline. Nat Rev Genet 2000;307:302-7.
23. Gilbert SF. The morphogenesis of evolutionary developmental biology. Int J Dev Biol 2003;47:467-77.
24. Hawkins RD, Hon GC, Ren B. Next-generation genomics: an integrative approach. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:476-86.
25. Ungerer MC, Johnson LC, Herman MA. Ecological genomics: understanding gene and genome function in the natural environment. Heredity (Edinb) 2008;100:178-83.
26. Khila A, Abouheif E, Rowe L. Evolution of a novel appendage ground plan in water striders is driven by changes in the Hox gene Ultrabithorax. PLoS Genet 2009;5:e1000583.
27. Refki PN, Armisén D, Crumière AJJ, et al. Emergence of tissue sensitivity to Hox protein levels underlies the evolution of an adaptive morphological trait. Dev Biol 2014;392:441-53.
28. Khila A, Abouheif E, Rowe L. Comparative functional analyses of ultrabithorax reveal multiple steps and paths to diversification of legs in the adaptive of semi-aquatic insects. Evolution 2014;68:2159-70.
29. Barrett RDH, Rogers SM, Schluter D. Natural selection on a major armor gene in threespine stickleback. Science 2008;322: 2006-8.
30. Linnen CR, Poh YP, Peterson BK, et al. Adaptive evolution of multiple traits through multiple mutations at a single gene. Science 2013;339:1312-16.
31. Bento G, Ogawa A, Sommer RJ. Co-option of the hormonesignalling module dafachronic acid-DAF-12 in nematode evolution. Nature 2010;466:494-7.
32. Colosimo PF, Hosemann KE, Balabhadra S, et al. Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of ectodysplasin alleles. Science 2005;307:1928-33.
33. Vignieri SN, Larson JG, Hoekstra HE. The selective advantage of crypsis in mice. Evolution 2010;64:2153-8.
34. Manceau M, Domingues VS, Mallarino R, et al. The developmental role of Agouti in color pattern evolution. Science 2011; 331:1062-5.
35. Linnen C, Kingsley E, Jensen J, et al. On the origin and spread of an adaptive allele in deer mice. Science 2009;325:1095-8.
36. Serobyan V, Ragsdale EJ, Sommer RJ. Adaptive value of a predatory mouth-form in a dimorphic nematode. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 2014;281:20141334.
37. Ragsdale EJ, Müller MR, Rödelsperger C, et al. A developmental switch coupled to the evolution of plasticity acts through a sulfatase. Cell 2014;155:922-33.
38. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. Sexual Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
39. Hu DL, Bush JWM. The hydrodynamics of water-walking arthropods. J Fluid Mech 2010;644:5-33.
40. Hu DL, Chan B, Bush JWM. The hydrodynamics of water strider locomotion. Nature 2003;424:663-6.
41. Andersen NM. A comparative study of locomotion on the water surface in semiaquatic bugs (Insecta, Hemiptera, Gerromorpha). Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren 1976:37-396.
42. Preziosi RF, Daphne FJ. Sexual size dimorphism and selection in the wild in the waterstrider aquarius remigis: lifetime fecundity selection on female total length and its components. Evolution 1997;51:467-74.
43. Laland K, Uller T, Feldman M, et al. Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature 2014;514:161-4.
44. Andersen NM. The Semiaquatic Bugs (Hemiptera: Gerromorpha). Klampenborg: Scandinavian Science Press LTD, 1982.
45. Gao X, Jiang L. Water-repellent legs of water striders. Nature 2004;432:36.
46. i5K Consortium. The i5K Initiative: advancing arthropod genomics for knowledge, human health, agriculture, and the environment. J Hered 2013;104:595-600.
47. Robinson GE, Hackett KJ, Purcell-Miramontes M, et al. Creating a Buzz about insect genomes. Science 2011;331:1386.
48. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:57-63.
49. Davey JW, Davey JL, Blaxter ML, et al. RADSeq: nextgeneration population genetics. Brief Funct Genomics 2010;9: 416-23.
50. Dean AM, Thornton JW. Mechanistic approaches to the study of evolution: the functional synthesis. Nat Rev Genet 2007;8: 675-88.
51. Hayashi K. The Evolution of Mating System and Sexual Dimorphism in the Water Strider Aquarius Elongatus. Osaka: Kinki University, 1995.
52. Spence J, Wilcox RS. The mating system of two hybridizing species of water striders (Gerridae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1986; 19:87-95.
53. Rowe L, Westlake K, Currie D. Functional significance of elaborate secondary sexual traits and their evolution in the water strider genus Rheumatobates. Can Entomol 2006;577: 568-77.
54. Tomoyasu Y, Denell RE. Larval RNAi in Tribolium (Coleoptera) for analyzing adult development. Dev Genes Evol 2004;214:575-8.
55. Sacher R, Stergiou L, Pelkmans L. Lessons from genetics: interpreting complex phenotypes in RNAi screens. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008;20:483-9.
56. Frankel N, Erezyilmaz DF, McGregor AP, et al. Morphological evolution caused by many subtle-effect substitutions in regulatory DNA. Nature 2011;474:598-603.
57. Sucena E, Delon I, Jones I, et al. Regulatory evolution of shavenbaby/ovo underlies multiple cases of morphological parallelism. Nature 2003;424:935-8.
58. Hölldobler BO, Wilson E. The Ants. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press, 1990.
59. Nowak MA, Tarnita CE, Wilson EO. The evolution of eusociality. Nature 2010;466:1057-62.
60. Khila A, Abouheif E. Reproductive constraint is a developmental mechanism that maintains social harmony in advanced ant societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:17884-9.
61. Rajakumar R, San Mauro D, Dijkstra MB, et al. Ancestral developmental potential facilitates parallel evolution in ants. Science 2012;335:79-82.
62. Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol 1964;7:17-52.
63. Gilles AF, Averof M. Functional genetics for all: engineered nucleases, CRISPR and the gene editing revolution. Evodevo 2014;5:43